La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage

In the 90’s, the French State began to worry about doping prevention and started to rely on some actors, who gradually established themselves as a Group of Experts. The aim of the present paper is first to describe this process by analyzing the relations between a Sports’ Administration which does n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivier Le Noé, Patrick Trabal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Mirail 2009-05-01
Series:Sciences de la Société
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/sds/8236
id doaj-0d8f2b83abc142629dee280b02c49485
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0d8f2b83abc142629dee280b02c494852020-12-21T13:48:50ZengPresses Universitaires du MirailSciences de la Société1168-14462275-21452009-05-017713615310.4000/sds.8236La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopageOlivier Le NoéPatrick TrabalIn the 90’s, the French State began to worry about doping prevention and started to rely on some actors, who gradually established themselves as a Group of Experts. The aim of the present paper is first to describe this process by analyzing the relations between a Sports’ Administration which does not enforce many constraints, and ‘preventologists’ (as they designate themselves) who manage to become unavoidable. In a second time, we have studied how this group built its scientific expertise together with the messages it spreads during prevention campaigns. Our work highlights on the one hand the tensions between the difficulties they encountered when linking this knowledge with academic disciplines, and, on the other hand, the propensity they had to assert their scientific legitimacy by using arguments of authority. Last but not least, we showed that the relations between these experts and the actors dealing with the targets of this prevention are profoundly asymmetric. Analyzing the conditions of sustainability for this Group of Experts, we highlight the fact that this distance with the realities of fieldwork is both a resource and a menace.http://journals.openedition.org/sds/8236expertisepreventiondopinghealthStatepolicies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Le Noé
Patrick Trabal
spellingShingle Olivier Le Noé
Patrick Trabal
La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
Sciences de la Société
expertise
prevention
doping
health
State
policies
author_facet Olivier Le Noé
Patrick Trabal
author_sort Olivier Le Noé
title La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
title_short La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
title_full La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
title_fullStr La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
title_full_unstemmed La construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
title_sort la construction d’une expertise : le cas de la prévention du dopage
publisher Presses Universitaires du Mirail
series Sciences de la Société
issn 1168-1446
2275-2145
publishDate 2009-05-01
description In the 90’s, the French State began to worry about doping prevention and started to rely on some actors, who gradually established themselves as a Group of Experts. The aim of the present paper is first to describe this process by analyzing the relations between a Sports’ Administration which does not enforce many constraints, and ‘preventologists’ (as they designate themselves) who manage to become unavoidable. In a second time, we have studied how this group built its scientific expertise together with the messages it spreads during prevention campaigns. Our work highlights on the one hand the tensions between the difficulties they encountered when linking this knowledge with academic disciplines, and, on the other hand, the propensity they had to assert their scientific legitimacy by using arguments of authority. Last but not least, we showed that the relations between these experts and the actors dealing with the targets of this prevention are profoundly asymmetric. Analyzing the conditions of sustainability for this Group of Experts, we highlight the fact that this distance with the realities of fieldwork is both a resource and a menace.
topic expertise
prevention
doping
health
State
policies
url http://journals.openedition.org/sds/8236
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierlenoe laconstructionduneexpertiselecasdelapreventiondudopage
AT patricktrabal laconstructionduneexpertiselecasdelapreventiondudopage
_version_ 1724374761861021696