Fact, Fiction, and Fitness

A theory of consciousness, whatever else it may do, must address the structure of experience. Our perceptual experiences are richly structured. Simply seeing a red apple, swaying between green leaves on a stout tree, involves symmetries, geometries, orders, topologies, and algebras of events. Are th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chetan Prakash, Chris Fields, Donald D. Hoffman, Robert Prentner, Manish Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/5/514
id doaj-0dc2a31ee24a4444890ef8d2a644e233
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0dc2a31ee24a4444890ef8d2a644e2332020-11-25T02:26:29ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002020-04-012251451410.3390/e22050514Fact, Fiction, and FitnessChetan Prakash0Chris Fields1Donald D. Hoffman2Robert Prentner3Manish Singh4Department of Mathematics, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USAIndependent Researcher, 23 rue des Lavandières, 11160 Caunes Minervois, FranceDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USADepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USADepartment of Psychology and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick/Piscataway Campus, NJ 08854, USAA theory of consciousness, whatever else it may do, must address the structure of experience. Our perceptual experiences are richly structured. Simply seeing a red apple, swaying between green leaves on a stout tree, involves symmetries, geometries, orders, topologies, and algebras of events. Are these structures also present in the world, fully independent of their observation? Perceptual theorists of many persuasions—from computational to radical embodied—say yes: perception veridically presents to observers structures that exist in an observer-independent world; and it does so because natural selection shapes perceptual systems to be increasingly veridical. Here we study four structures: total orders, permutation groups, cyclic groups, and measurable spaces. We ask whether the payoff functions that drive evolution by natural selection are homomorphisms of these structures. We prove, in each case, that generically the answer is no: as the number of world states and payoff values go to infinity, the probability that a payoff function is a homomorphism goes to zero. We conclude that natural selection almost surely shapes perceptions of these structures to be non-veridical. This is consistent with the interface theory of perception, which claims that natural selection shapes perceptual systems not to provide veridical perceptions, but to serve as species-specific interfaces that guide adaptive behavior. Our results present a constraint for any theory of consciousness which assumes that structure in perceptual experience is shaped by natural selection.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/5/514natural selectionperceptionveridicalityevolutionary psychologyBayesian decision theoryfitness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chetan Prakash
Chris Fields
Donald D. Hoffman
Robert Prentner
Manish Singh
spellingShingle Chetan Prakash
Chris Fields
Donald D. Hoffman
Robert Prentner
Manish Singh
Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
Entropy
natural selection
perception
veridicality
evolutionary psychology
Bayesian decision theory
fitness
author_facet Chetan Prakash
Chris Fields
Donald D. Hoffman
Robert Prentner
Manish Singh
author_sort Chetan Prakash
title Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
title_short Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
title_full Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
title_fullStr Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
title_full_unstemmed Fact, Fiction, and Fitness
title_sort fact, fiction, and fitness
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2020-04-01
description A theory of consciousness, whatever else it may do, must address the structure of experience. Our perceptual experiences are richly structured. Simply seeing a red apple, swaying between green leaves on a stout tree, involves symmetries, geometries, orders, topologies, and algebras of events. Are these structures also present in the world, fully independent of their observation? Perceptual theorists of many persuasions—from computational to radical embodied—say yes: perception veridically presents to observers structures that exist in an observer-independent world; and it does so because natural selection shapes perceptual systems to be increasingly veridical. Here we study four structures: total orders, permutation groups, cyclic groups, and measurable spaces. We ask whether the payoff functions that drive evolution by natural selection are homomorphisms of these structures. We prove, in each case, that generically the answer is no: as the number of world states and payoff values go to infinity, the probability that a payoff function is a homomorphism goes to zero. We conclude that natural selection almost surely shapes perceptions of these structures to be non-veridical. This is consistent with the interface theory of perception, which claims that natural selection shapes perceptual systems not to provide veridical perceptions, but to serve as species-specific interfaces that guide adaptive behavior. Our results present a constraint for any theory of consciousness which assumes that structure in perceptual experience is shaped by natural selection.
topic natural selection
perception
veridicality
evolutionary psychology
Bayesian decision theory
fitness
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/5/514
work_keys_str_mv AT chetanprakash factfictionandfitness
AT chrisfields factfictionandfitness
AT donalddhoffman factfictionandfitness
AT robertprentner factfictionandfitness
AT manishsingh factfictionandfitness
_version_ 1724846730812325888