Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies

Macroparticle simulation plays an important role in modern accelerator design and operation. Most linear rf accelerators have been designed based on macroparticle simulations using longitudinal position as the independent variable. In this paper, we have done a systematic comparison between using lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji Qiang, Robert D. Ryne, Robert W. Garnett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2002-06-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.5.064201
id doaj-0ddb513041f8434a9e1a3a536f90ecc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ddb513041f8434a9e1a3a536f90ecc22020-11-25T02:01:16ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams1098-44022002-06-015606420110.1103/PhysRevSTAB.5.064201Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studiesJi QiangRobert D. RyneRobert W. GarnettMacroparticle simulation plays an important role in modern accelerator design and operation. Most linear rf accelerators have been designed based on macroparticle simulations using longitudinal position as the independent variable. In this paper, we have done a systematic comparison between using longitudinal position as the independent variable and using time as the independent variable in macroparticle simulations. We have found that, for an rms-matched beam, the maximum relative moment difference for second, fourth moments and beam maximum amplitudes between these two types of simulations is 0.25% in a 10 m reference transport system with physical parameters similar to the Spallation Neutron Source linac design. The maximum z-to- t transform error in the space-charge force calculation of the position dependent simulation is about 0.1% in such a system. This might cause a several percent error in a complete simulation of a linac with a length of hundreds of meters. Furthermore, the error may be several times larger in simulations of mismatched beams. However, if such errors are acceptable to the linac designer, then one is justified in using position dependent macroparticle simulations in this type of linac design application.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.5.064201
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ji Qiang
Robert D. Ryne
Robert W. Garnett
spellingShingle Ji Qiang
Robert D. Ryne
Robert W. Garnett
Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
author_facet Ji Qiang
Robert D. Ryne
Robert W. Garnett
author_sort Ji Qiang
title Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
title_short Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
title_full Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
title_fullStr Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
title_full_unstemmed Systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
title_sort systematic comparison of position and time dependent macroparticle simulations in beam dynamics studies
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams
issn 1098-4402
publishDate 2002-06-01
description Macroparticle simulation plays an important role in modern accelerator design and operation. Most linear rf accelerators have been designed based on macroparticle simulations using longitudinal position as the independent variable. In this paper, we have done a systematic comparison between using longitudinal position as the independent variable and using time as the independent variable in macroparticle simulations. We have found that, for an rms-matched beam, the maximum relative moment difference for second, fourth moments and beam maximum amplitudes between these two types of simulations is 0.25% in a 10 m reference transport system with physical parameters similar to the Spallation Neutron Source linac design. The maximum z-to- t transform error in the space-charge force calculation of the position dependent simulation is about 0.1% in such a system. This might cause a several percent error in a complete simulation of a linac with a length of hundreds of meters. Furthermore, the error may be several times larger in simulations of mismatched beams. However, if such errors are acceptable to the linac designer, then one is justified in using position dependent macroparticle simulations in this type of linac design application.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.5.064201
work_keys_str_mv AT jiqiang systematiccomparisonofpositionandtimedependentmacroparticlesimulationsinbeamdynamicsstudies
AT robertdryne systematiccomparisonofpositionandtimedependentmacroparticlesimulationsinbeamdynamicsstudies
AT robertwgarnett systematiccomparisonofpositionandtimedependentmacroparticlesimulationsinbeamdynamicsstudies
_version_ 1724957742696759296