Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity

AIM: To compare the effects of yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with relatively better visual acuity [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.15 logMAR]. ME...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sezen Akkaya, Banu Açıkalın, Yusuf Emre Doğan, Fatih Çoban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2020-10-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2020/10/20201015.pdf
id doaj-0de478f6f2b74addbad529399d04b3c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0de478f6f2b74addbad529399d04b3c42020-11-25T04:02:23ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982020-10-0113101606161110.18240/ijo.2020.10.15Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuitySezen Akkaya0Banu Açıkalın1Yusuf Emre Doğan2Fatih Çoban3Departmant of Ophthalmology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, FSM Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34752, TurkeyDepartmant of Ophthalmology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, FSM Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34752, TurkeyDepartmant of Ophthalmology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, FSM Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34752, TurkeyDepartmant of Ophthalmology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, FSM Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34752, TurkeyAIM: To compare the effects of yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with relatively better visual acuity [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.15 logMAR]. METHODS: The medical records of 76 eyes of 47 patients underwent IV (0.5 mg) anti-VEGF injection or SML for the DME with relatively better BCVA were reviewed. The IV group received three consecutive monthly IV anti-VEGF injections, then were retreated as needed. The laser treatment group was treated at baseline and 3mo, and then retreated at 6 and 9mo if needed. All participants were followed up for one year. The mean BCVA and mean central macular thickness (CMT) values changes over the follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four and 23 patients were assigned to the SML and IV subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatments was 3.64±0.76 in SML group and 5.85±1.38 in IV group (P<0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean BCVA score at baseline and at the 1st and 3rd months, but the score of SML group was better than that of IV group at the 6th, 9th, and 12th months (P<0.05). The decrease in the mean CMT values from baseline values was higher in SML group at the 6th, 9th, and 12th months (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Yellow SML treatment is superior to IV anti-VEGF injection in DME patients with relatively better BCVA for increasing visual acuity and decreasing CMT at 6, 9, and 12mo. SML can be a good alternative first-line therapy for DME with BCVA ≤0.15 logMAR.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2020/10/20201015.pdfdiabetic macular edemasubthreshold micropulse laseranti-vegf injection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sezen Akkaya
Banu Açıkalın
Yusuf Emre Doğan
Fatih Çoban
spellingShingle Sezen Akkaya
Banu Açıkalın
Yusuf Emre Doğan
Fatih Çoban
Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
International Journal of Ophthalmology
diabetic macular edema
subthreshold micropulse laser
anti-vegf injection
author_facet Sezen Akkaya
Banu Açıkalın
Yusuf Emre Doğan
Fatih Çoban
author_sort Sezen Akkaya
title Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
title_short Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
title_full Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
title_fullStr Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
title_full_unstemmed Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
title_sort subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-vegf for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
publishDate 2020-10-01
description AIM: To compare the effects of yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with relatively better visual acuity [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.15 logMAR]. METHODS: The medical records of 76 eyes of 47 patients underwent IV (0.5 mg) anti-VEGF injection or SML for the DME with relatively better BCVA were reviewed. The IV group received three consecutive monthly IV anti-VEGF injections, then were retreated as needed. The laser treatment group was treated at baseline and 3mo, and then retreated at 6 and 9mo if needed. All participants were followed up for one year. The mean BCVA and mean central macular thickness (CMT) values changes over the follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four and 23 patients were assigned to the SML and IV subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatments was 3.64±0.76 in SML group and 5.85±1.38 in IV group (P<0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean BCVA score at baseline and at the 1st and 3rd months, but the score of SML group was better than that of IV group at the 6th, 9th, and 12th months (P<0.05). The decrease in the mean CMT values from baseline values was higher in SML group at the 6th, 9th, and 12th months (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Yellow SML treatment is superior to IV anti-VEGF injection in DME patients with relatively better BCVA for increasing visual acuity and decreasing CMT at 6, 9, and 12mo. SML can be a good alternative first-line therapy for DME with BCVA ≤0.15 logMAR.
topic diabetic macular edema
subthreshold micropulse laser
anti-vegf injection
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2020/10/20201015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sezenakkaya subthresholdmicropulselaserversusintravitrealantivegffordiabeticmacularedemapatientswithrelativelybettervisualacuity
AT banuacıkalın subthresholdmicropulselaserversusintravitrealantivegffordiabeticmacularedemapatientswithrelativelybettervisualacuity
AT yusufemredogan subthresholdmicropulselaserversusintravitrealantivegffordiabeticmacularedemapatientswithrelativelybettervisualacuity
AT fatihcoban subthresholdmicropulselaserversusintravitrealantivegffordiabeticmacularedemapatientswithrelativelybettervisualacuity
_version_ 1724443155841941504