Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships

The relationship between learning and group work is often treated as self-evident, but the finer workings of this relationship require further study into the social organisation of group work. The aim of the research that forms the basis for the current article is to locate, describe, and gain new u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fredrik Rusk, Wenche Rønning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Education Inquiry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1638194
id doaj-0de6a64d5d3d442ebce1f8eb581189dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0de6a64d5d3d442ebce1f8eb581189dd2020-11-25T03:24:22ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082020-01-01111365310.1080/20004508.2019.16381941638194Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationshipsFredrik Rusk0Wenche Rønning1Nord UniversityNord UniversityThe relationship between learning and group work is often treated as self-evident, but the finer workings of this relationship require further study into the social organisation of group work. The aim of the research that forms the basis for the current article is to locate, describe, and gain new understanding of how peers organise their group work with a focus on epistemic negotiations. Based on detailed micro-analyses of several situations where pupils express their knowledge and orient to other’s expressions of knowledge regarding the current assignment, we focus on describing and exemplifying how participants organise their social interaction and cooperation in group work. There appear to be important factors that may affect the group work. These include access to physical resources, participants’ expressed knowledge and orientation to co-participants’ expressed knowledge, and access to new knowledge. Through a micro-analysis of group work, we can better understand the dynamics of group work and better pinpoint cooperation and communication skills and strategies that are important to consider as learnables, themselves.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1638194cooperationsocial organisationinteractionlearninggroup work
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fredrik Rusk
Wenche Rønning
spellingShingle Fredrik Rusk
Wenche Rønning
Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
Education Inquiry
cooperation
social organisation
interaction
learning
group work
author_facet Fredrik Rusk
Wenche Rønning
author_sort Fredrik Rusk
title Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
title_short Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
title_full Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
title_fullStr Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
title_full_unstemmed Group work as an arena for learning in STEM education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
title_sort group work as an arena for learning in stem education: negotiations of epistemic relationships
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Education Inquiry
issn 2000-4508
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The relationship between learning and group work is often treated as self-evident, but the finer workings of this relationship require further study into the social organisation of group work. The aim of the research that forms the basis for the current article is to locate, describe, and gain new understanding of how peers organise their group work with a focus on epistemic negotiations. Based on detailed micro-analyses of several situations where pupils express their knowledge and orient to other’s expressions of knowledge regarding the current assignment, we focus on describing and exemplifying how participants organise their social interaction and cooperation in group work. There appear to be important factors that may affect the group work. These include access to physical resources, participants’ expressed knowledge and orientation to co-participants’ expressed knowledge, and access to new knowledge. Through a micro-analysis of group work, we can better understand the dynamics of group work and better pinpoint cooperation and communication skills and strategies that are important to consider as learnables, themselves.
topic cooperation
social organisation
interaction
learning
group work
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1638194
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikrusk groupworkasanarenaforlearninginstemeducationnegotiationsofepistemicrelationships
AT wencherønning groupworkasanarenaforlearninginstemeducationnegotiationsofepistemicrelationships
_version_ 1724601981400514560