The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review

Abstract Much research effort is being invested into the development of porous biomaterials that enhance implant osseointegration. Large micromotions at the bone-implant interface impair this osseointegration process, resulting in fibrous capsule formation and implant loosening. This systematic revi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nupur Kohli, Jennifer C. Stoddart, Richard J. van Arkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5
id doaj-0df24780b5124cc4a52b7616fc197545
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0df24780b5124cc4a52b7616fc1975452021-05-30T11:35:48ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-05-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-90142-5The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic reviewNupur Kohli0Jennifer C. Stoddart1Richard J. van Arkel2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College LondonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College LondonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College LondonAbstract Much research effort is being invested into the development of porous biomaterials that enhance implant osseointegration. Large micromotions at the bone-implant interface impair this osseointegration process, resulting in fibrous capsule formation and implant loosening. This systematic review compiled all the in vivo evidence available to establish if there is a universal limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42020196686). Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies containing terms relating to micromotion and osseointegration. The mean value of micromotion for implants that osseointegrated was 32% of the mean value for those that did not (112 ± 176 µm versus 349 ± 231 µm, p < 0.001). However, there was a large overlap in the data ranges with no universal limit apparent. Rather, many factors were found to combine to affect the overall outcome including loading time, the type of implant and the material being used. The tables provided in this review summarise these factors and will aid investigators in identifying the most relevant micromotion values for their biomaterial and implant development research.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nupur Kohli
Jennifer C. Stoddart
Richard J. van Arkel
spellingShingle Nupur Kohli
Jennifer C. Stoddart
Richard J. van Arkel
The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
Scientific Reports
author_facet Nupur Kohli
Jennifer C. Stoddart
Richard J. van Arkel
author_sort Nupur Kohli
title The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
title_short The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
title_full The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
title_fullStr The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
title_sort limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Much research effort is being invested into the development of porous biomaterials that enhance implant osseointegration. Large micromotions at the bone-implant interface impair this osseointegration process, resulting in fibrous capsule formation and implant loosening. This systematic review compiled all the in vivo evidence available to establish if there is a universal limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42020196686). Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for studies containing terms relating to micromotion and osseointegration. The mean value of micromotion for implants that osseointegrated was 32% of the mean value for those that did not (112 ± 176 µm versus 349 ± 231 µm, p < 0.001). However, there was a large overlap in the data ranges with no universal limit apparent. Rather, many factors were found to combine to affect the overall outcome including loading time, the type of implant and the material being used. The tables provided in this review summarise these factors and will aid investigators in identifying the most relevant micromotion values for their biomaterial and implant development research.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nupurkohli thelimitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT jennifercstoddart thelimitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT richardjvanarkel thelimitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT nupurkohli limitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT jennifercstoddart limitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT richardjvanarkel limitoftolerablemicromotionforimplantosseointegrationasystematicreview
_version_ 1721420124169175040