A novel histopathological scoring system to distinguish urticarial vasculitis from chronic spontaneous urticaria

• Main Authors: Viktoria Puhl, Hanna Bonnekoh, Jörg Scheffel, Tomasz Hawro, Karsten Weller, Peter von den Driesch, Hans‐Joachim Röwert‐Huber, José Cardoso, Margarida Gonçalo, Marcus Maurer, Karoline Krause
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
• Series: Clinical and Translational Allergy
• Subjects: chronische sponstane urtikaria; endothelzellschwellung; erythrozyten‐extravasate; fibrin; histopathologie; leukozytoklasie
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12031

Abstract Background Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is defined by long‐lasting urticarial lesions combined with the histopathologic findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As one of the major unmet needs in UV, diagnostic criteria are rather vague and not standardized. Moreover, there seems to be considerable overlap with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), particularly for the normocomplementemic variant of UV. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a diagnostic scoring system that improves the histopathologic discrimination between UV and CSU. Methods Lesional skin sections of patients with clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of UV (n = 46) and CSU (n = 51) were analyzed (blinded to the diagnosis) for the following pre‐defined criteria: presence of leukocytoclasia, erythrocyte extravasation, fibrin deposits, endothelial cell swelling, ectatic vessels, blurred vessel borders, dermal edema, intravascular neutrophil, and eosinophil numbers and numbers of dermal neutrophils, macrophages and mast cells. Results The greatest differences between UV and CSU samples were observed for leukocytoclasia (present in 76% of UV vs. 3.9% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), erythrocyte extravasation (present in 41.3% of UV vs. 2.0% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), and fibrin deposits (present in 27.9% of UV vessels vs. 9.7% of CSU vessels; p < 0.0001). Based on these findings, we developed a diagnostic score, the urticarial vasculitis score (UVS), which correctly assigned 37 of 46 cases of UV and 49 of 51 cases of CSU to the previously established diagnosis. Conclusion Our results suggest that the UVS, a combined quantitative assessment of the three criteria leukocytoclasia, fibrin deposits and extravasated erythrocytes, distinguishes UV from CSU in skin histopathology. The UVS, if validated in larger patient samples, may help to improve the diagnostic approach to UV.