Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity

The problems of determining the direct object of crime under article 173.2 of the RF Criminal Code are investigated. It’s noted that the article contains two independent corpus delicti. The characteristic that unites them is the direct object of crime, which is broken in two ways: by person providin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Petukhov E.V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation 2014-12-01
Series:Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/petuhov.pdf
id doaj-0e09aee5371644c0b1b7c1878950ded2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e09aee5371644c0b1b7c1878950ded22020-11-24T21:00:38ZengTyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian FederationUridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika1998-69632014-12-014(30)5962Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entityPetukhov E.V.0k rasnodar u niversity of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian FederationThe problems of determining the direct object of crime under article 173.2 of the RF Criminal Code are investigated. It’s noted that the article contains two independent corpus delicti. The characteristic that unites them is the direct object of crime, which is broken in two ways: by person providing the relevant documents and by person receiving these documents and information. Scientific points of view concerning the understanding of crime object are estimated. Understanding the object as a legal order of carrying out business activities doesn’t allow to outline the scope of the corresponding relations. Many crimes under chapter 22 of the RF Criminal Code impinge these relations. The author disagrees with the recognition of public relations, ensuring the use of necessary documents for registration of only those organizations that are engaged in lawful activities, as direct object of unlawful use of documents to form (establish, reorganize) a legal entity. It’s emphasized that documents submission to the registering authority for registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs can be carried out by the applicant or his representative acting on the basis of a notarized power of attorney. The fact of forming legal entity should be connected with certain individuals. Then the organization will have certain responsible persons. The act provided by the analyzed corpus delicti, contributes to this rule violation. It’s summarized that the direct object of crime under considered article is public relations arising due to ensuring the statutory procedure for personalization and identification of responsible individual forming (establishing, reorganizing) a legal entity.http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/petuhov.pdfobject of crimeresponsibilityentrepreneurshiplegal entityfalse entrepreneurship
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petukhov E.V.
spellingShingle Petukhov E.V.
Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
object of crime
responsibility
entrepreneurship
legal entity
false entrepreneurship
author_facet Petukhov E.V.
author_sort Petukhov E.V.
title Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
title_short Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
title_full Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
title_fullStr Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
title_full_unstemmed Public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
title_sort public relations violated by unlawful use of documents to form a legal entity
publisher Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation
series Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika
issn 1998-6963
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The problems of determining the direct object of crime under article 173.2 of the RF Criminal Code are investigated. It’s noted that the article contains two independent corpus delicti. The characteristic that unites them is the direct object of crime, which is broken in two ways: by person providing the relevant documents and by person receiving these documents and information. Scientific points of view concerning the understanding of crime object are estimated. Understanding the object as a legal order of carrying out business activities doesn’t allow to outline the scope of the corresponding relations. Many crimes under chapter 22 of the RF Criminal Code impinge these relations. The author disagrees with the recognition of public relations, ensuring the use of necessary documents for registration of only those organizations that are engaged in lawful activities, as direct object of unlawful use of documents to form (establish, reorganize) a legal entity. It’s emphasized that documents submission to the registering authority for registration of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs can be carried out by the applicant or his representative acting on the basis of a notarized power of attorney. The fact of forming legal entity should be connected with certain individuals. Then the organization will have certain responsible persons. The act provided by the analyzed corpus delicti, contributes to this rule violation. It’s summarized that the direct object of crime under considered article is public relations arising due to ensuring the statutory procedure for personalization and identification of responsible individual forming (establishing, reorganizing) a legal entity.
topic object of crime
responsibility
entrepreneurship
legal entity
false entrepreneurship
url http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/petuhov.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT petukhovev publicrelationsviolatedbyunlawfuluseofdocumentstoformalegalentity
_version_ 1716779126572974080