Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide

Objective Since the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a public health emergency, medical societies around the world published COVID-19 recommendations to physicians to ensure patient care and physician safety. During this pandemic, ophthalmologists around the world adapted their clinical and sur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne X Nguyen, Kalla A Gervasio, Albert Y Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-01
Series:BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000525.full
id doaj-0e102869742446748956255e974dd257
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e102869742446748956255e974dd2572021-03-17T14:00:29ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Ophthalmology2397-32692020-10-015110.1136/bmjophth-2020-000525Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwideAnne X Nguyen0Kalla A Gervasio1Albert Y Wu2Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USAObjective Since the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a public health emergency, medical societies around the world published COVID-19 recommendations to physicians to ensure patient care and physician safety. During this pandemic, ophthalmologists around the world adapted their clinical and surgical practice following such guidelines. This original research examines all publicly available COVID-19 recommendations from twelve major ophthalmology societies around the world.Methods and analysis Twelve ophthalmology societies recognised by the International Council of Ophthalmology were included in this study. One society per each WHO region was included: the society selected was the one who had the highest number of national COVID-19 confirmed cases on 11 May 2020. In addition to these countries, the major ophthalmology society in each G7 country was included.Results Ten out of 12 major international ophthalmology societies from countries covering all six WHO regions have given recommendations regarding urgent patient care, social distancing, telemedicine and personal protective equipment when caring for ophthalmic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. While all guidelines emphasise the importance of postponing non-urgent care and taking necessary safety measures, specific recommendations differ between countries.Conclusions As there is no clear consensus on ophthalmology guidelines across countries, this paper highlights the differences in international ophthalmic care recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge of the differences in ophthalmic management plans will allow ophthalmologists and all eye care providers to consider the variety of international approaches and apply best practices following evidence-based recommendations during pandemics.https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000525.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne X Nguyen
Kalla A Gervasio
Albert Y Wu
spellingShingle Anne X Nguyen
Kalla A Gervasio
Albert Y Wu
Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
author_facet Anne X Nguyen
Kalla A Gervasio
Albert Y Wu
author_sort Anne X Nguyen
title Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
title_short Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
title_full Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
title_fullStr Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
title_full_unstemmed Differences in SARS-CoV-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
title_sort differences in sars-cov-2 recommendations from major ophthalmology societies worldwide
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Ophthalmology
issn 2397-3269
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Objective Since the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak as a public health emergency, medical societies around the world published COVID-19 recommendations to physicians to ensure patient care and physician safety. During this pandemic, ophthalmologists around the world adapted their clinical and surgical practice following such guidelines. This original research examines all publicly available COVID-19 recommendations from twelve major ophthalmology societies around the world.Methods and analysis Twelve ophthalmology societies recognised by the International Council of Ophthalmology were included in this study. One society per each WHO region was included: the society selected was the one who had the highest number of national COVID-19 confirmed cases on 11 May 2020. In addition to these countries, the major ophthalmology society in each G7 country was included.Results Ten out of 12 major international ophthalmology societies from countries covering all six WHO regions have given recommendations regarding urgent patient care, social distancing, telemedicine and personal protective equipment when caring for ophthalmic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. While all guidelines emphasise the importance of postponing non-urgent care and taking necessary safety measures, specific recommendations differ between countries.Conclusions As there is no clear consensus on ophthalmology guidelines across countries, this paper highlights the differences in international ophthalmic care recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge of the differences in ophthalmic management plans will allow ophthalmologists and all eye care providers to consider the variety of international approaches and apply best practices following evidence-based recommendations during pandemics.
url https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000525.full
work_keys_str_mv AT annexnguyen differencesinsarscov2recommendationsfrommajorophthalmologysocietiesworldwide
AT kallaagervasio differencesinsarscov2recommendationsfrommajorophthalmologysocietiesworldwide
AT albertywu differencesinsarscov2recommendationsfrommajorophthalmologysocietiesworldwide
_version_ 1724218374861357056