Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows

Since gamma-ray bursts(GRBs) have been first known to science societites in 1973, many scientists are involved in their studies. Observations of GRB afterglows provide us with much information on the environment in which the observed GRBs are born. Study of GRB afterglows deals with longer timescale...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sung-Eun Kim, Heon-Young Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Space Science Society (KSSS) 2005-12-01
Series:Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2005/v22n4/OJOOBS_2005_v22n4_377.pdf
id doaj-0e2c4e82a3564a13b33b0cb074020441
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e2c4e82a3564a13b33b0cb0740204412020-11-24T23:18:58ZengKorean Space Science Society (KSSS)Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences2093-55872093-14092005-12-0122437738410.5140/JASS.2005.22.4.377Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB AfterglowsSung-Eun Kim0Heon-Young Chang1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Korea Since gamma-ray bursts(GRBs) have been first known to science societites in 1973, many scientists are involved in their studies. Observations of GRB afterglows provide us with much information on the environment in which the observed GRBs are born. Study of GRB afterglows deals with longer timescale emissions in lower energy bands (e.g., months or even up to years) than prompt emissions in gamma-rays. Not all the bursts accompany afterglows in whole ranges of wavelengths. It has been suggested as a reason for that, for instance, that radio and/or X-ray afterglows are not recorded mainly due to lower sensitivity of detectors, and optical afterglows due to extinctions in intergalactic media or self-extinctions within a host galaxy itself. Based on the idea that these facts may also provide information on the GRB environment, we analyze statistical properties of GRB afterglows. We first select samples of the redshift-known GRBs according to the wavelength of afterglow they accompanied. We then compare their distributions as a function of redshift, using statistical methods. As a results, we find that the distribution of the GRBs with X-ray afterglows is consistent with that of the GRBs with optical afterglows. We, therefore, conclude that the lower detection rate of optical afterglows is not due to extinctions in intergalactic media.http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2005/v22n4/OJOOBS_2005_v22n4_377.pdfgamma ray burstsafterglowsmiscellaneous - cosmology - methodsstatistical
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sung-Eun Kim
Heon-Young Chang
spellingShingle Sung-Eun Kim
Heon-Young Chang
Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences
gamma ray bursts
afterglows
miscellaneous - cosmology - methods
statistical
author_facet Sung-Eun Kim
Heon-Young Chang
author_sort Sung-Eun Kim
title Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
title_short Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
title_full Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
title_fullStr Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
title_full_unstemmed Gamma-ray Burst Formation Environment: Comparison of Redshift Distributions of GRB Afterglows
title_sort gamma-ray burst formation environment: comparison of redshift distributions of grb afterglows
publisher Korean Space Science Society (KSSS)
series Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences
issn 2093-5587
2093-1409
publishDate 2005-12-01
description Since gamma-ray bursts(GRBs) have been first known to science societites in 1973, many scientists are involved in their studies. Observations of GRB afterglows provide us with much information on the environment in which the observed GRBs are born. Study of GRB afterglows deals with longer timescale emissions in lower energy bands (e.g., months or even up to years) than prompt emissions in gamma-rays. Not all the bursts accompany afterglows in whole ranges of wavelengths. It has been suggested as a reason for that, for instance, that radio and/or X-ray afterglows are not recorded mainly due to lower sensitivity of detectors, and optical afterglows due to extinctions in intergalactic media or self-extinctions within a host galaxy itself. Based on the idea that these facts may also provide information on the GRB environment, we analyze statistical properties of GRB afterglows. We first select samples of the redshift-known GRBs according to the wavelength of afterglow they accompanied. We then compare their distributions as a function of redshift, using statistical methods. As a results, we find that the distribution of the GRBs with X-ray afterglows is consistent with that of the GRBs with optical afterglows. We, therefore, conclude that the lower detection rate of optical afterglows is not due to extinctions in intergalactic media.
topic gamma ray bursts
afterglows
miscellaneous - cosmology - methods
statistical
url http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2005/v22n4/OJOOBS_2005_v22n4_377.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sungeunkim gammarayburstformationenvironmentcomparisonofredshiftdistributionsofgrbafterglows
AT heonyoungchang gammarayburstformationenvironmentcomparisonofredshiftdistributionsofgrbafterglows
_version_ 1725579008015335424