4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
Background: Brachial blood pressure (BP) may not reflect central BP due to systolic BP (SBP) amplification. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) elicit vascular irregularities that may affect SBP amplification or other central BP indices (including pulse pressure [PP], augmentation pressure...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Atlantis Press
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Artery Research |
Online Access: | https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930700/view |
id |
doaj-0e3caaaeb5da4f9db93db5f7da4bcba3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0e3caaaeb5da4f9db93db5f7da4bcba32020-11-25T02:56:31ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.0244.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUSRachel Climie*Petr OtahalMartin SchultzJames FellVelandai SrikanthJames SharmanBackground: Brachial blood pressure (BP) may not reflect central BP due to systolic BP (SBP) amplification. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) elicit vascular irregularities that may affect SBP amplification or other central BP indices (including pulse pressure [PP], augmentation pressure [AP] and augmentation index [AIx]). By systematic review and meta-analysis, this study aimed to determine the magnitude and variation of central-to-brachial SBP and PP amplification, AIx and AP in T2DM compared to non-diabetic controls. Methods: Online databases were searched for published studies reporting invasive or non-invasive central and brachial SBP in T2DM and non-diabetic controls. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to analyse the studies. Results: We identified 17 studies with a total of 2,711 T2DM and 10,460 non-diabetic controls. There was no significant difference in SBP amplification between groups (T2DM = 10.8, non-diabetic = 10.2 mmHg; pooled estimate = 0.6 mmHg, 95%CI −0.3, 1.5, p = 0.21), but large variation in both (T2DM range = 2.0–16.6 mmHg, non-diabetic range = 1.0–16.1 mmHg). In the meta-regression, duration of T2DM explained 16.3% of the variance in the pooled data (p = 0.15); the difference in amplification between groups increasing by 0.3 mmHg per year of T2DM. PP amplification was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.16). AP, AIx and AIx corrected for heart rate were significantly higher in T2DM (p < 0.05 all). Conclusions: Patients with T2DM have increased AP and AIx, but no difference in SBP (or PP) amplification compared to non-diabetic individuals. However, SBP amplification is highly variable and increases with duration of T2DM; altogether confirming that central systolic loading cannot be reliably estimated from brachial BP in T2DM.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930700/view |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rachel Climie* Petr Otahal Martin Schultz James Fell Velandai Srikanth James Sharman |
spellingShingle |
Rachel Climie* Petr Otahal Martin Schultz James Fell Velandai Srikanth James Sharman 4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS Artery Research |
author_facet |
Rachel Climie* Petr Otahal Martin Schultz James Fell Velandai Srikanth James Sharman |
author_sort |
Rachel Climie* |
title |
4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS |
title_short |
4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS |
title_full |
4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS |
title_fullStr |
4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS |
title_full_unstemmed |
4.5 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CENTRAL TO BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION IN PATIENTS TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS |
title_sort |
4.5 a systematic review and meta-analysis of central to brachial blood pressure amplification in patients type 2 diabetes mellitus |
publisher |
Atlantis Press |
series |
Artery Research |
issn |
1876-4401 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
Background: Brachial blood pressure (BP) may not reflect central BP due to systolic BP (SBP) amplification. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) elicit vascular irregularities that may affect SBP amplification or other central BP indices (including pulse pressure [PP], augmentation pressure [AP] and augmentation index [AIx]). By systematic review and meta-analysis, this study aimed to determine the magnitude and variation of central-to-brachial SBP and PP amplification, AIx and AP in T2DM compared to non-diabetic controls.
Methods: Online databases were searched for published studies reporting invasive or non-invasive central and brachial SBP in T2DM and non-diabetic controls. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to analyse the studies.
Results: We identified 17 studies with a total of 2,711 T2DM and 10,460 non-diabetic controls. There was no significant difference in SBP amplification between groups (T2DM = 10.8, non-diabetic = 10.2 mmHg; pooled estimate = 0.6 mmHg, 95%CI −0.3, 1.5, p = 0.21), but large variation in both (T2DM range = 2.0–16.6 mmHg, non-diabetic range = 1.0–16.1 mmHg). In the meta-regression, duration of T2DM explained 16.3% of the variance in the pooled data (p = 0.15); the difference in amplification between groups increasing by 0.3 mmHg per year of T2DM. PP amplification was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.16). AP, AIx and AIx corrected for heart rate were significantly higher in T2DM (p < 0.05 all).
Conclusions: Patients with T2DM have increased AP and AIx, but no difference in SBP (or PP) amplification compared to non-diabetic individuals. However, SBP amplification is highly variable and increases with duration of T2DM; altogether confirming that central systolic loading cannot be reliably estimated from brachial BP in T2DM. |
url |
https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930700/view |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rachelclimie 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus AT petrotahal 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus AT martinschultz 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus AT jamesfell 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus AT velandaisrikanth 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus AT jamessharman 45asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcentraltobrachialbloodpressureamplificationinpatientstype2diabetesmellitus |
_version_ |
1724713586476974080 |