The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration

Determining if we, or another agent, were responsible for a sensory event can require an accurate sense of timing. Our sense of appropriate timing relationships must, however, be malleable as there is a variable delay between the physical timing of an event and when sensory signals concerning that e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Derek Henry Arnold, Kathleen eNancarrow, Kielan eYarrow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00235/full
id doaj-0e414f092060482aa6ad69944b2cb3b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e414f092060482aa6ad69944b2cb3b52020-11-25T02:20:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612012-08-01610.3389/fnhum.2012.0023530461The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibrationDerek Henry Arnold0Kathleen eNancarrow1Kielan eYarrow2The University of QueenslandThe University of QueenslandCity University LondonDetermining if we, or another agent, were responsible for a sensory event can require an accurate sense of timing. Our sense of appropriate timing relationships must, however, be malleable as there is a variable delay between the physical timing of an event and when sensory signals concerning that event are encoded in the brain. One dramatic demonstration of such malleability involves having people repeatedly press a button thereby causing a beep. If a delay is inserted between button presses and beeps, when it is subsequently taken away beeps can seem to precede the button presses that caused them. For this to occur it is important that people feel they were responsible for instigating the beeps. In terms of their timing, as yet it is not clear what combination of events is important for motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Here, by introducing ballistic reaches of short or longer extent before a button press, we varied the delay between the intention to act and the sensory consequence of that action. This manipulation failed to modulate recalibration magnitude. By contrast, introducing a similarly lengthened delay between button presses and consequent beeps eliminated recalibration. Thus it would seem that the critical timing relationship for motor-sensory temporal recalibration is between tactile signals relating to the completion of an action and the subsequent auditory percept.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00235/fullTime Perceptionadaptationtemporal recalibrationCausality PerceptionMotor-Sensory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Derek Henry Arnold
Kathleen eNancarrow
Kielan eYarrow
spellingShingle Derek Henry Arnold
Kathleen eNancarrow
Kielan eYarrow
The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Time Perception
adaptation
temporal recalibration
Causality Perception
Motor-Sensory
author_facet Derek Henry Arnold
Kathleen eNancarrow
Kielan eYarrow
author_sort Derek Henry Arnold
title The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
title_short The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
title_full The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
title_fullStr The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
title_full_unstemmed The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
title_sort critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2012-08-01
description Determining if we, or another agent, were responsible for a sensory event can require an accurate sense of timing. Our sense of appropriate timing relationships must, however, be malleable as there is a variable delay between the physical timing of an event and when sensory signals concerning that event are encoded in the brain. One dramatic demonstration of such malleability involves having people repeatedly press a button thereby causing a beep. If a delay is inserted between button presses and beeps, when it is subsequently taken away beeps can seem to precede the button presses that caused them. For this to occur it is important that people feel they were responsible for instigating the beeps. In terms of their timing, as yet it is not clear what combination of events is important for motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Here, by introducing ballistic reaches of short or longer extent before a button press, we varied the delay between the intention to act and the sensory consequence of that action. This manipulation failed to modulate recalibration magnitude. By contrast, introducing a similarly lengthened delay between button presses and consequent beeps eliminated recalibration. Thus it would seem that the critical timing relationship for motor-sensory temporal recalibration is between tactile signals relating to the completion of an action and the subsequent auditory percept.
topic Time Perception
adaptation
temporal recalibration
Causality Perception
Motor-Sensory
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00235/full
work_keys_str_mv AT derekhenryarnold thecriticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
AT kathleenenancarrow thecriticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
AT kielaneyarrow thecriticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
AT derekhenryarnold criticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
AT kathleenenancarrow criticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
AT kielaneyarrow criticaleventsformotorsensorytemporalrecalibration
_version_ 1724870947765223424