Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies
Abstract Background New sequencing technologies have lowered financial barriers to whole genome sequencing, but resulting assemblies are often fragmented and far from ‘finished’. Updating multi-scaffold drafts to chromosome-level status can be achieved through experimental mapping or re-sequencing e...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Biology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0728-3 |
id |
doaj-0e880bd2992b417b9c80e8cec3c83014 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Robert M. Waterhouse Sergey Aganezov Yoann Anselmetti Jiyoung Lee Livio Ruzzante Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders Romain Feron Sèverine Bérard Phillip George Matthew W. Hahn Paul I. Howell Maryam Kamali Sergey Koren Daniel Lawson Gareth Maslen Ashley Peery Adam M. Phillippy Maria V. Sharakhova Eric Tannier Maria F. Unger Simo V. Zhang Max A. Alekseyev Nora J. Besansky Cedric Chauve Scott J. Emrich Igor V. Sharakhov |
spellingShingle |
Robert M. Waterhouse Sergey Aganezov Yoann Anselmetti Jiyoung Lee Livio Ruzzante Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders Romain Feron Sèverine Bérard Phillip George Matthew W. Hahn Paul I. Howell Maryam Kamali Sergey Koren Daniel Lawson Gareth Maslen Ashley Peery Adam M. Phillippy Maria V. Sharakhova Eric Tannier Maria F. Unger Simo V. Zhang Max A. Alekseyev Nora J. Besansky Cedric Chauve Scott J. Emrich Igor V. Sharakhov Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies BMC Biology Genome assembly Gene synteny Comparative genomics Mosquito genomes Orthology Bioinformatics |
author_facet |
Robert M. Waterhouse Sergey Aganezov Yoann Anselmetti Jiyoung Lee Livio Ruzzante Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders Romain Feron Sèverine Bérard Phillip George Matthew W. Hahn Paul I. Howell Maryam Kamali Sergey Koren Daniel Lawson Gareth Maslen Ashley Peery Adam M. Phillippy Maria V. Sharakhova Eric Tannier Maria F. Unger Simo V. Zhang Max A. Alekseyev Nora J. Besansky Cedric Chauve Scott J. Emrich Igor V. Sharakhov |
author_sort |
Robert M. Waterhouse |
title |
Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies |
title_short |
Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies |
title_full |
Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies |
title_fullStr |
Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies |
title_sort |
evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve anopheles genome assemblies |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Biology |
issn |
1741-7007 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background New sequencing technologies have lowered financial barriers to whole genome sequencing, but resulting assemblies are often fragmented and far from ‘finished’. Updating multi-scaffold drafts to chromosome-level status can be achieved through experimental mapping or re-sequencing efforts. Avoiding the costs associated with such approaches, comparative genomic analysis of gene order conservation (synteny) to predict scaffold neighbours (adjacencies) offers a potentially useful complementary method for improving draft assemblies. Results We evaluated and employed 3 gene synteny-based methods applied to 21 Anopheles mosquito assemblies to produce consensus sets of scaffold adjacencies. For subsets of the assemblies, we integrated these with additional supporting data to confirm and complement the synteny-based adjacencies: 6 with physical mapping data that anchor scaffolds to chromosome locations, 13 with paired-end RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data, and 3 with new assemblies based on re-scaffolding or long-read data. Our combined analyses produced 20 new superscaffolded assemblies with improved contiguities: 7 for which assignments of non-anchored scaffolds to chromosome arms span more than 75% of the assemblies, and a further 7 with chromosome anchoring including an 88% anchored Anopheles arabiensis assembly and, respectively, 73% and 84% anchored assemblies with comprehensively updated cytogenetic photomaps for Anopheles funestus and Anopheles stephensi. Conclusions Experimental data from probe mapping, RNAseq, or long-read technologies, where available, all contribute to successful upgrading of draft assemblies. Our evaluations show that gene synteny-based computational methods represent a valuable alternative or complementary approach. Our improved Anopheles reference assemblies highlight the utility of applying comparative genomics approaches to improve community genomic resources. |
topic |
Genome assembly Gene synteny Comparative genomics Mosquito genomes Orthology Bioinformatics |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0728-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robertmwaterhouse evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT sergeyaganezov evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT yoannanselmetti evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT jiyounglee evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT livioruzzante evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT maartenjmfreijnders evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT romainferon evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT severineberard evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT phillipgeorge evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT matthewwhahn evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT paulihowell evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT maryamkamali evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT sergeykoren evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT daniellawson evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT garethmaslen evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT ashleypeery evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT adammphillippy evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT mariavsharakhova evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT erictannier evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT mariafunger evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT simovzhang evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT maxaalekseyev evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT norajbesansky evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT cedricchauve evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT scottjemrich evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies AT igorvsharakhov evolutionarysuperscaffoldingandchromosomeanchoringtoimproveanophelesgenomeassemblies |
_version_ |
1724350559535759360 |
spelling |
doaj-0e880bd2992b417b9c80e8cec3c830142021-01-03T12:14:01ZengBMCBMC Biology1741-70072020-01-0118112010.1186/s12915-019-0728-3Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assembliesRobert M. Waterhouse0Sergey Aganezov1Yoann Anselmetti2Jiyoung Lee3Livio Ruzzante4Maarten J. M. F. Reijnders5Romain Feron6Sèverine Bérard7Phillip George8Matthew W. Hahn9Paul I. Howell10Maryam Kamali11Sergey Koren12Daniel Lawson13Gareth Maslen14Ashley Peery15Adam M. Phillippy16Maria V. Sharakhova17Eric Tannier18Maria F. Unger19Simo V. Zhang20Max A. Alekseyev21Nora J. Besansky22Cedric Chauve23Scott J. Emrich24Igor V. Sharakhov25Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton UniversityISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRDThe Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRDDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDepartments of Biology and Computer Science, Indiana UniversityCenters for Disease Control and PreventionDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of HealthEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics InstituteEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics InstituteDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of HealthDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon 1, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5558 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre DameDepartments of Biology and Computer Science, Indiana UniversityDepartment of Mathematics and Computational Biology Institute, George Washington UniversityEck Institute for Global Health and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre DameDepartment of Mathematics, Simon Fraser UniversityDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of TennesseeThe Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAbstract Background New sequencing technologies have lowered financial barriers to whole genome sequencing, but resulting assemblies are often fragmented and far from ‘finished’. Updating multi-scaffold drafts to chromosome-level status can be achieved through experimental mapping or re-sequencing efforts. Avoiding the costs associated with such approaches, comparative genomic analysis of gene order conservation (synteny) to predict scaffold neighbours (adjacencies) offers a potentially useful complementary method for improving draft assemblies. Results We evaluated and employed 3 gene synteny-based methods applied to 21 Anopheles mosquito assemblies to produce consensus sets of scaffold adjacencies. For subsets of the assemblies, we integrated these with additional supporting data to confirm and complement the synteny-based adjacencies: 6 with physical mapping data that anchor scaffolds to chromosome locations, 13 with paired-end RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data, and 3 with new assemblies based on re-scaffolding or long-read data. Our combined analyses produced 20 new superscaffolded assemblies with improved contiguities: 7 for which assignments of non-anchored scaffolds to chromosome arms span more than 75% of the assemblies, and a further 7 with chromosome anchoring including an 88% anchored Anopheles arabiensis assembly and, respectively, 73% and 84% anchored assemblies with comprehensively updated cytogenetic photomaps for Anopheles funestus and Anopheles stephensi. Conclusions Experimental data from probe mapping, RNAseq, or long-read technologies, where available, all contribute to successful upgrading of draft assemblies. Our evaluations show that gene synteny-based computational methods represent a valuable alternative or complementary approach. Our improved Anopheles reference assemblies highlight the utility of applying comparative genomics approaches to improve community genomic resources.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0728-3Genome assemblyGene syntenyComparative genomicsMosquito genomesOrthologyBioinformatics |