Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study

Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare in vitro the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Resilon and Gutta-percha. Methodology: Eighty extracted single canal teeth were selected and randomly assigned to five groups of sixteen teeth eac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh R Shetty, Moksha Nayak, Jimmy Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization
Online Access:http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2009;volume=1;issue=3;spage=37;epage=48;aulast=Shetty
id doaj-0e975b883fb74671b8ab104c66f46de3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e975b883fb74671b8ab104c66f46de32020-11-24T23:24:46ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization2231-07542009-01-01133748Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro studyRajesh R ShettyMoksha NayakJimmy ThomasAims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare in vitro the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Resilon and Gutta-percha. Methodology: Eighty extracted single canal teeth were selected and randomly assigned to five groups of sixteen teeth each. Teeth were sectioned using a diamond disc so as to obtain a root length of 14±1 mm. Roots were instrumented using .04 taper Profile rotary system to an apical size of 40 and obturated using .04 taper single cone (size 40) as follows: Group 1: Resilon .04 taper cone and Epiphany Self etching sealer, Group 2: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and AH Plus sealer ,Group 3: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and Roeko Seal Automix sealer, Group 4: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and Zinc oxide Eugenol sealer , Group 5: .04 taper gutta-percha cone without the use of a sealer. Following obturation, teeth were mounted in Poly Vinyl Chloride jigs using self cure acrylic resin such that 9mm of the root remained exposed. Fracture resistance testing was done using Instron testing machine using a vertical load applied perpendicular to the root surface. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Student′s ′t′ test. Results: Very highly significant difference was observed between the groups (P=.001). Resilon with Epiphany group demonstrated highest mean fracture resistance value and gutta-percha without sealer displayed the least, comparative results were highly significant. Resilon compared to gutta-percha with Roeko Seal Automix (P=.037) and Zinc Oxide Eugenolsealers (P=.029) showed statistically significant difference. AH plus group showed significantly higher value compared to gutta-percha without sealer. Conclusions: Filling the root canals with Resilon increased the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots compared to standard gutta-percha techniques. Adhesive sealers are more beneficial in increasing the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2009;volume=1;issue=3;spage=37;epage=48;aulast=Shetty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajesh R Shetty
Moksha Nayak
Jimmy Thomas
spellingShingle Rajesh R Shetty
Moksha Nayak
Jimmy Thomas
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization
author_facet Rajesh R Shetty
Moksha Nayak
Jimmy Thomas
author_sort Rajesh R Shetty
title Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
title_short Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
title_full Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
title_fullStr Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - A comparative in-vitro study
title_sort fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with resilon and guttapercha - a comparative in-vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization
issn 2231-0754
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare in vitro the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Resilon and Gutta-percha. Methodology: Eighty extracted single canal teeth were selected and randomly assigned to five groups of sixteen teeth each. Teeth were sectioned using a diamond disc so as to obtain a root length of 14±1 mm. Roots were instrumented using .04 taper Profile rotary system to an apical size of 40 and obturated using .04 taper single cone (size 40) as follows: Group 1: Resilon .04 taper cone and Epiphany Self etching sealer, Group 2: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and AH Plus sealer ,Group 3: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and Roeko Seal Automix sealer, Group 4: .04 taper gutta-percha cone and Zinc oxide Eugenol sealer , Group 5: .04 taper gutta-percha cone without the use of a sealer. Following obturation, teeth were mounted in Poly Vinyl Chloride jigs using self cure acrylic resin such that 9mm of the root remained exposed. Fracture resistance testing was done using Instron testing machine using a vertical load applied perpendicular to the root surface. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Student′s ′t′ test. Results: Very highly significant difference was observed between the groups (P=.001). Resilon with Epiphany group demonstrated highest mean fracture resistance value and gutta-percha without sealer displayed the least, comparative results were highly significant. Resilon compared to gutta-percha with Roeko Seal Automix (P=.037) and Zinc Oxide Eugenolsealers (P=.029) showed statistically significant difference. AH plus group showed significantly higher value compared to gutta-percha without sealer. Conclusions: Filling the root canals with Resilon increased the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots compared to standard gutta-percha techniques. Adhesive sealers are more beneficial in increasing the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
url http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2009;volume=1;issue=3;spage=37;epage=48;aulast=Shetty
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshrshetty fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithresilonandguttaperchaacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT mokshanayak fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithresilonandguttaperchaacomparativeinvitrostudy
AT jimmythomas fractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedrootsfilledwithresilonandguttaperchaacomparativeinvitrostudy
_version_ 1725558838673801216