Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change

<p>The assessment of future impacts of climate change is associated with a cascade of uncertainty linked to the modelling chain employed in assessing local-scale changes. Understanding and quantifying this cascade is essential for developing effective adaptation actions. We evaluate and quanti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Meresa, C. Murphy, R. Fealy, S. Golian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-09-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/5237/2021/hess-25-5237-2021.pdf
id doaj-0ef88434882341668af92137fe6e51da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ef88434882341668af92137fe6e51da2021-09-27T10:52:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382021-09-01255237525710.5194/hess-25-5237-2021Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate changeH. MeresaC. MurphyR. FealyS. Golian<p>The assessment of future impacts of climate change is associated with a cascade of uncertainty linked to the modelling chain employed in assessing local-scale changes. Understanding and quantifying this cascade is essential for developing effective adaptation actions. We evaluate and quantify uncertainties in future flood quantiles associated with climate change for four catchments, incorporating within our modelling chain uncertainties associated with 12 global climate models contained in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, five different bias correction approaches, hydrological model parameter uncertainty and the use of three different extreme value distributions for flood frequency analysis. Results indicate increased flood hazard in all catchments for different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), with changes in flooding consistent with changes in annual maximum precipitation. We use additive chains and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to quantify and decompose uncertainties and their interactions in estimating selected flood quantiles for each catchment. We find that not only do the contributions of different sources of uncertainty vary by catchment, but that the dominant sources of uncertainty can be very different on a catchment-by-catchment basis. While uncertainties in future projections are widely assumed to be dominated by the ensemble of climate models used, we find that in one of our catchments uncertainties associated with bias correction methods dominate, while in another the uncertainty associated with the use of different extreme value distributions outweighs the uncertainty associated with the ensemble of climate models. These findings highlight the inability to generalise a priori about the importance of different components of the cascade of uncertainty in future flood hazard at the catchment scale. Moreover, we find that the interaction of components of the modelling chain employed are substantial (<span class="inline-formula"><i>&gt;</i></span> 20 % of overall uncertainty in two catchments). While our sample is small, there is evidence that the dominant components of the cascade of uncertainty may be linked to catchment characteristics and rainfall–runoff processes. Future work that seeks to further explore the characteristics of the uncertainty cascade as they relate to catchment characteristics may provide insight into a priori identifying the key components of modelling chains to be targeted in climate change impact assessments.</p>https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/5237/2021/hess-25-5237-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Meresa
C. Murphy
R. Fealy
S. Golian
spellingShingle H. Meresa
C. Murphy
R. Fealy
S. Golian
Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet H. Meresa
C. Murphy
R. Fealy
S. Golian
author_sort H. Meresa
title Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
title_short Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
title_full Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
title_fullStr Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
title_sort uncertainties and their interaction in flood hazard assessment with climate change
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2021-09-01
description <p>The assessment of future impacts of climate change is associated with a cascade of uncertainty linked to the modelling chain employed in assessing local-scale changes. Understanding and quantifying this cascade is essential for developing effective adaptation actions. We evaluate and quantify uncertainties in future flood quantiles associated with climate change for four catchments, incorporating within our modelling chain uncertainties associated with 12 global climate models contained in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, five different bias correction approaches, hydrological model parameter uncertainty and the use of three different extreme value distributions for flood frequency analysis. Results indicate increased flood hazard in all catchments for different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), with changes in flooding consistent with changes in annual maximum precipitation. We use additive chains and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to quantify and decompose uncertainties and their interactions in estimating selected flood quantiles for each catchment. We find that not only do the contributions of different sources of uncertainty vary by catchment, but that the dominant sources of uncertainty can be very different on a catchment-by-catchment basis. While uncertainties in future projections are widely assumed to be dominated by the ensemble of climate models used, we find that in one of our catchments uncertainties associated with bias correction methods dominate, while in another the uncertainty associated with the use of different extreme value distributions outweighs the uncertainty associated with the ensemble of climate models. These findings highlight the inability to generalise a priori about the importance of different components of the cascade of uncertainty in future flood hazard at the catchment scale. Moreover, we find that the interaction of components of the modelling chain employed are substantial (<span class="inline-formula"><i>&gt;</i></span> 20 % of overall uncertainty in two catchments). While our sample is small, there is evidence that the dominant components of the cascade of uncertainty may be linked to catchment characteristics and rainfall–runoff processes. Future work that seeks to further explore the characteristics of the uncertainty cascade as they relate to catchment characteristics may provide insight into a priori identifying the key components of modelling chains to be targeted in climate change impact assessments.</p>
url https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/5237/2021/hess-25-5237-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hmeresa uncertaintiesandtheirinteractioninfloodhazardassessmentwithclimatechange
AT cmurphy uncertaintiesandtheirinteractioninfloodhazardassessmentwithclimatechange
AT rfealy uncertaintiesandtheirinteractioninfloodhazardassessmentwithclimatechange
AT sgolian uncertaintiesandtheirinteractioninfloodhazardassessmentwithclimatechange
_version_ 1716866835430768640