Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce val...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kilsdonk, Ellen, van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline, van der Pal, Helena J, Hollema, Nynke, Kremer, Leontien C, van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M, van Leeuwen, Flora E, Jaspers, Monique W, van den Berg, Marleen H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2015-11-01
Series:JMIR Cancer
Online Access:http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/
id doaj-0f159905319444cc816201ef9c3bf6ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f159905319444cc816201ef9c3bf6ec2021-05-03T02:53:57ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Cancer2369-19992015-11-0112e1110.2196/cancer.3905Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled TrialKilsdonk, Ellenvan Dulmen-den Broeder, Elinevan der Pal, Helena JHollema, NynkeKremer, Leontien Cvan den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry Mvan Leeuwen, Flora EJaspers, Monique Wvan den Berg, Marleen H BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). MethodsA total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone. ConclusionInvitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves. Trial RegistrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX)http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kilsdonk, Ellen
van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline
van der Pal, Helena J
Hollema, Nynke
Kremer, Leontien C
van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M
van Leeuwen, Flora E
Jaspers, Monique W
van den Berg, Marleen H
spellingShingle Kilsdonk, Ellen
van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline
van der Pal, Helena J
Hollema, Nynke
Kremer, Leontien C
van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M
van Leeuwen, Flora E
Jaspers, Monique W
van den Berg, Marleen H
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR Cancer
author_facet Kilsdonk, Ellen
van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline
van der Pal, Helena J
Hollema, Nynke
Kremer, Leontien C
van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M
van Leeuwen, Flora E
Jaspers, Monique W
van den Berg, Marleen H
author_sort Kilsdonk, Ellen
title Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effect of web-based versus paper-based questionnaires and follow-up strategies on participation rates of dutch childhood cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Cancer
issn 2369-1999
publishDate 2015-11-01
description BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). MethodsA total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone. ConclusionInvitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves. Trial RegistrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX)
url http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/
work_keys_str_mv AT kilsdonkellen effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandulmendenbroedereline effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderpalhelenaj effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hollemanynke effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kremerleontienc effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenheuveleibrinkmarrym effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanleeuwenflorae effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jaspersmoniquew effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbergmarleenh effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721484801139015680