Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce val...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2015-11-01
|
Series: | JMIR Cancer |
Online Access: | http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/ |
id |
doaj-0f159905319444cc816201ef9c3bf6ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0f159905319444cc816201ef9c3bf6ec2021-05-03T02:53:57ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Cancer2369-19992015-11-0112e1110.2196/cancer.3905Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled TrialKilsdonk, Ellenvan Dulmen-den Broeder, Elinevan der Pal, Helena JHollema, NynkeKremer, Leontien Cvan den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry Mvan Leeuwen, Flora EJaspers, Monique Wvan den Berg, Marleen H BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). MethodsA total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone. ConclusionInvitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves. Trial RegistrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX)http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H |
spellingShingle |
Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial JMIR Cancer |
author_facet |
Kilsdonk, Ellen van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline van der Pal, Helena J Hollema, Nynke Kremer, Leontien C van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M van Leeuwen, Flora E Jaspers, Monique W van den Berg, Marleen H |
author_sort |
Kilsdonk, Ellen |
title |
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short |
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full |
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr |
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort |
effect of web-based versus paper-based questionnaires and follow-up strategies on participation rates of dutch childhood cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
JMIR Cancer |
issn |
2369-1999 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
BackgroundQuestionnaires are widely used in survey research, especially in cohort studies. However, participation in questionnaire studies has been declining over the past decades. Because high participation rates are needed to limit the risk of selection bias and produce valid results, it is important to investigate invitation strategies which may improve participation.
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Web-based versus paper-based questionnaires on participation rates in a questionnaire survey on late effects among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs).
MethodsA total of 750 CCSs were randomized across 3 study arms. The initial invitation in study arms 1 and 2 consisted of a Web-based questionnaire only, whereas in study arm 3 this invitation was complemented with a paper-based version of the questionnaire. The first postal reminder, sent to the nonresponding CCSs in all 3 study arms, consisted of either a reminder letter only (study arms 1 and 3) or a reminder letter complemented with a paper-based questionnaire (study arm 2). The second postal reminder was restricted to CCSs in study arms 1 and 2, with only those in study arm 1 also receiving a paper-based questionnaire. CCSs in study arm 3 received a second reminder by telephone instead of by mail. In contrast to CCSs in study arm 3, CCSs in study arms 1 and 2 received a third reminder, this time by telephone.
ConclusionInvitation strategies offering a Web-based questionnaire without a paper-based alternative at first invitation can be used without compromising participation rates of CCS. Offering the choice between paper- and Web-based questionnaires seems to result in the highest accrual participation rate. Future research should look into the quality of the data delivered by both questionnaires filled in by respondents themselves.
Trial RegistrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 84711754; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN84711754 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6c9ZB8paX) |
url |
http://cancer.jmir.org/2015/2/e11/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kilsdonkellen effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandulmendenbroedereline effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderpalhelenaj effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hollemanynke effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kremerleontienc effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenheuveleibrinkmarrym effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanleeuwenflorae effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jaspersmoniquew effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vandenbergmarleenh effectofwebbasedversuspaperbasedquestionnairesandfollowupstrategiesonparticipationratesofdutchchildhoodcancersurvivorsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1721484801139015680 |