Advancing human health risk assessment
Abstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and do...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-07-01
|
Series: | EFSA Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712 |
id |
doaj-0f302bfb6da94a9aabcf53f76a21b21c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0f302bfb6da94a9aabcf53f76a21b21c2021-05-02T02:46:08ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-07-0117S1n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712Advancing human health risk assessmentAnna Lanzoni0Anna F Castoldi1George EN Kass2Andrea Terron3Guilhem De Seze4Anna Bal‐Price5Frédéric Y Bois6K Barry Delclos7Daniel R Doerge8Ellen Fritsche9Thorhallur Halldorsson10Marike Kolossa‐Gehring11Susanne Hougaard Bennekou12Frits Koning13Alfonso Lampen14Marcel Leist15Ellen Mantus16Christophe Rousselle17Michael Siegrist18Pablo Steinberg19Angelika Tritscher20Bob Van de Water21Paolo Vineis22Nigel Walker23Heather Wallace24Maurice Whelan25Maged Younes26European Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre Ispra ITFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks FRNational Center for Toxicological Research US Food and Drug Administration USANational Center for Toxicological Research US Food and Drug Administration USALeibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine DEUniversity of Iceland ISGerman Environment Agency DENational Food Institute Technical University of Denmark DKLeiden University Medical Centre NLGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment Berlin DEUniversity of Konstanz DEThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine USAFrench Agency for Food, Occupational and Environmental Health FRETH Zurich CHMax‐Rubner Institute DEWorld Health Organisation Geneva CHDrug Discovery and Safety Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research Leiden University NLImperial College London UKNational Toxicology Program/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences USAInstitute of Medical Sciences University of Aberdeen Scotland UKEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre Ispra ITFormerly World Health Organisation Geneva CHAbstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712alternative methodsexposureepidemiologyfood safetymechanistic studiesrisk assessment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna Lanzoni Anna F Castoldi George EN Kass Andrea Terron Guilhem De Seze Anna Bal‐Price Frédéric Y Bois K Barry Delclos Daniel R Doerge Ellen Fritsche Thorhallur Halldorsson Marike Kolossa‐Gehring Susanne Hougaard Bennekou Frits Koning Alfonso Lampen Marcel Leist Ellen Mantus Christophe Rousselle Michael Siegrist Pablo Steinberg Angelika Tritscher Bob Van de Water Paolo Vineis Nigel Walker Heather Wallace Maurice Whelan Maged Younes |
spellingShingle |
Anna Lanzoni Anna F Castoldi George EN Kass Andrea Terron Guilhem De Seze Anna Bal‐Price Frédéric Y Bois K Barry Delclos Daniel R Doerge Ellen Fritsche Thorhallur Halldorsson Marike Kolossa‐Gehring Susanne Hougaard Bennekou Frits Koning Alfonso Lampen Marcel Leist Ellen Mantus Christophe Rousselle Michael Siegrist Pablo Steinberg Angelika Tritscher Bob Van de Water Paolo Vineis Nigel Walker Heather Wallace Maurice Whelan Maged Younes Advancing human health risk assessment EFSA Journal alternative methods exposure epidemiology food safety mechanistic studies risk assessment |
author_facet |
Anna Lanzoni Anna F Castoldi George EN Kass Andrea Terron Guilhem De Seze Anna Bal‐Price Frédéric Y Bois K Barry Delclos Daniel R Doerge Ellen Fritsche Thorhallur Halldorsson Marike Kolossa‐Gehring Susanne Hougaard Bennekou Frits Koning Alfonso Lampen Marcel Leist Ellen Mantus Christophe Rousselle Michael Siegrist Pablo Steinberg Angelika Tritscher Bob Van de Water Paolo Vineis Nigel Walker Heather Wallace Maurice Whelan Maged Younes |
author_sort |
Anna Lanzoni |
title |
Advancing human health risk assessment |
title_short |
Advancing human health risk assessment |
title_full |
Advancing human health risk assessment |
title_fullStr |
Advancing human health risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Advancing human health risk assessment |
title_sort |
advancing human health risk assessment |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
EFSA Journal |
issn |
1831-4732 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Abstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018). |
topic |
alternative methods exposure epidemiology food safety mechanistic studies risk assessment |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annalanzoni advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT annafcastoldi advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT georgeenkass advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT andreaterron advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT guilhemdeseze advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT annabalprice advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT fredericybois advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT kbarrydelclos advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT danielrdoerge advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT ellenfritsche advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT thorhallurhalldorsson advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT marikekolossagehring advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT susannehougaardbennekou advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT fritskoning advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT alfonsolampen advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT marcelleist advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT ellenmantus advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT christopherousselle advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT michaelsiegrist advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT pablosteinberg advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT angelikatritscher advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT bobvandewater advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT paolovineis advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT nigelwalker advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT heatherwallace advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT mauricewhelan advancinghumanhealthriskassessment AT magedyounes advancinghumanhealthriskassessment |
_version_ |
1721495916391694336 |