Advancing human health risk assessment

Abstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Lanzoni, Anna F Castoldi, George EN Kass, Andrea Terron, Guilhem De Seze, Anna Bal‐Price, Frédéric Y Bois, K Barry Delclos, Daniel R Doerge, Ellen Fritsche, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Marike Kolossa‐Gehring, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Frits Koning, Alfonso Lampen, Marcel Leist, Ellen Mantus, Christophe Rousselle, Michael Siegrist, Pablo Steinberg, Angelika Tritscher, Bob Van de Water, Paolo Vineis, Nigel Walker, Heather Wallace, Maurice Whelan, Maged Younes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712
id doaj-0f302bfb6da94a9aabcf53f76a21b21c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f302bfb6da94a9aabcf53f76a21b21c2021-05-02T02:46:08ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322019-07-0117S1n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712Advancing human health risk assessmentAnna Lanzoni0Anna F Castoldi1George EN Kass2Andrea Terron3Guilhem De Seze4Anna Bal‐Price5Frédéric Y Bois6K Barry Delclos7Daniel R Doerge8Ellen Fritsche9Thorhallur Halldorsson10Marike Kolossa‐Gehring11Susanne Hougaard Bennekou12Frits Koning13Alfonso Lampen14Marcel Leist15Ellen Mantus16Christophe Rousselle17Michael Siegrist18Pablo Steinberg19Angelika Tritscher20Bob Van de Water21Paolo Vineis22Nigel Walker23Heather Wallace24Maurice Whelan25Maged Younes26European Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Food Safety Authority ITEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre Ispra ITFrench National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks FRNational Center for Toxicological Research US Food and Drug Administration USANational Center for Toxicological Research US Food and Drug Administration USALeibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine DEUniversity of Iceland ISGerman Environment Agency DENational Food Institute Technical University of Denmark DKLeiden University Medical Centre NLGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment Berlin DEUniversity of Konstanz DEThe National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine USAFrench Agency for Food, Occupational and Environmental Health FRETH Zurich CHMax‐Rubner Institute DEWorld Health Organisation Geneva CHDrug Discovery and Safety Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research Leiden University NLImperial College London UKNational Toxicology Program/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences USAInstitute of Medical Sciences University of Aberdeen Scotland UKEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre Ispra ITFormerly World Health Organisation Geneva CHAbstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712alternative methodsexposureepidemiologyfood safetymechanistic studiesrisk assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Lanzoni
Anna F Castoldi
George EN Kass
Andrea Terron
Guilhem De Seze
Anna Bal‐Price
Frédéric Y Bois
K Barry Delclos
Daniel R Doerge
Ellen Fritsche
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Marike Kolossa‐Gehring
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Frits Koning
Alfonso Lampen
Marcel Leist
Ellen Mantus
Christophe Rousselle
Michael Siegrist
Pablo Steinberg
Angelika Tritscher
Bob Van de Water
Paolo Vineis
Nigel Walker
Heather Wallace
Maurice Whelan
Maged Younes
spellingShingle Anna Lanzoni
Anna F Castoldi
George EN Kass
Andrea Terron
Guilhem De Seze
Anna Bal‐Price
Frédéric Y Bois
K Barry Delclos
Daniel R Doerge
Ellen Fritsche
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Marike Kolossa‐Gehring
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Frits Koning
Alfonso Lampen
Marcel Leist
Ellen Mantus
Christophe Rousselle
Michael Siegrist
Pablo Steinberg
Angelika Tritscher
Bob Van de Water
Paolo Vineis
Nigel Walker
Heather Wallace
Maurice Whelan
Maged Younes
Advancing human health risk assessment
EFSA Journal
alternative methods
exposure
epidemiology
food safety
mechanistic studies
risk assessment
author_facet Anna Lanzoni
Anna F Castoldi
George EN Kass
Andrea Terron
Guilhem De Seze
Anna Bal‐Price
Frédéric Y Bois
K Barry Delclos
Daniel R Doerge
Ellen Fritsche
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Marike Kolossa‐Gehring
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou
Frits Koning
Alfonso Lampen
Marcel Leist
Ellen Mantus
Christophe Rousselle
Michael Siegrist
Pablo Steinberg
Angelika Tritscher
Bob Van de Water
Paolo Vineis
Nigel Walker
Heather Wallace
Maurice Whelan
Maged Younes
author_sort Anna Lanzoni
title Advancing human health risk assessment
title_short Advancing human health risk assessment
title_full Advancing human health risk assessment
title_fullStr Advancing human health risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Advancing human health risk assessment
title_sort advancing human health risk assessment
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract The current/traditional human health risk assessment paradigm is challenged by recent scientific and technical advances, and ethical demands. The current approach is considered too resource intensive, is not always reliable, can raise issues of reproducibility, is mostly animal based and does not necessarily provide an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. From an ethical and scientific viewpoint, a paradigm shift is required to deliver testing strategies that enable reliable, animal‐free hazard and risk assessments, which are based on a mechanistic understanding of chemical toxicity and make use of exposure science and epidemiological data. This shift will require a new philosophy, new data, multidisciplinary expertise and more flexible regulations. Re‐engineering of available data is also deemed necessary as data should be accessible, readable, interpretable and usable. Dedicated training to build the capacity in terms of expertise is necessary, together with practical resources allocated to education. The dialogue between risk assessors, risk managers, academia and stakeholders should be promoted further to understand scientific and societal needs. Genuine interest in taking risk assessment forward should drive the change and should be supported by flexible funding. This publication builds upon presentations made and discussions held during the break‐out session ‘Advancing risk assessment science – Human health’ at EFSA's third Scientific Conference ‘Science, Food and Society’ (Parma, Italy, 18–21 September 2018).
topic alternative methods
exposure
epidemiology
food safety
mechanistic studies
risk assessment
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170712
work_keys_str_mv AT annalanzoni advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT annafcastoldi advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT georgeenkass advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT andreaterron advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT guilhemdeseze advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT annabalprice advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT fredericybois advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT kbarrydelclos advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT danielrdoerge advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT ellenfritsche advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT thorhallurhalldorsson advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT marikekolossagehring advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT susannehougaardbennekou advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT fritskoning advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT alfonsolampen advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT marcelleist advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT ellenmantus advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT christopherousselle advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT michaelsiegrist advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT pablosteinberg advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT angelikatritscher advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT bobvandewater advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT paolovineis advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT nigelwalker advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT heatherwallace advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT mauricewhelan advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
AT magedyounes advancinghumanhealthriskassessment
_version_ 1721495916391694336