Glyphosate-Resistant Italian Ryegrass (<i>Lolium perenne</i> L. spp. <i>Multiflorum</i>) Control and Seed Suppression in Mississippi

Italian ryegrass is a major weed problem in wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) production worldwide. Two separate studies were conducted in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate: (1) the efficacy of herbicides available to Mississippi producers for controlling glyphosate-resistant (GR) It...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taghi Bararpour, Jason A. Bond, Gurbir Singh, Ralph R. Hale, Matt Edwards, Benjamin H. Lawrence
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/2/162
Description
Summary:Italian ryegrass is a major weed problem in wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) production worldwide. Two separate studies were conducted in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate: (1) the efficacy of herbicides available to Mississippi producers for controlling glyphosate-resistant (GR) Italian ryegrass (control study), and (2) fall burndown herbicide seed suppression study. Results of the control study showed that flufenacet/metribuzin EPOST followed by (fb) pinoxaden LPOST (standard treatment) provided 93% control of GR Italian ryegrass. Some other treatments provided comparable Italian ryegrass control (92% to 97%) as the standard treatment in 2017. Italian ryegrass control in the seed suppression study was 100%, 100%, 67.5%, 97%, and 99.5% from the application of the following treatments: (1) <i>S</i>-metolachlor + flumioxazin + paraquat in October&#8722;November fb glyphosate + clethodim in January&#8722;February fb gramoxone as needed (weed-free check); (2) <i>S</i>-metolachlor + flumioxazin + paraquat in October&#8722;November; (3) field cultivator (disk) in October&#8722;November; (4) glyphosate + clethodim in January&#8722;February; and (5) field cultivator in October&#8722;November fb glyphosate + clethodim in January&#8722;February, respectively. The remaining Italian ryegrass from the application of treatments 3, 4, and 5 produced 65,700; 1008; and 9 seeds m<sup>&#8722;2</sup>, respectively. Seed suppression study highlights the importance of 100% control that is required to manage GR Italian grass.
ISSN:2073-4395