Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers

The contamination of the environment with human pharmaceuticals is widespread and demand for such products is mounting globally. Wild vertebrates may be at particular risk from any effects from pharmaceuticals, because of the evolutionary conservation of drug targets. However, exposure of wildlife t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophia E. Whitlock, M. Glória Pereira, Julie Lane, Darren Sleep, Richard F. Shore, Kathryn E. Arnold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-05-01
Series:Environment International
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018326229
id doaj-0f3a62e1a67249db906b10cb4b9c0bbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f3a62e1a67249db906b10cb4b9c0bbf2020-11-25T00:51:40ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202019-05-01126193201Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathersSophia E. Whitlock0M. Glória Pereira1Julie Lane2Darren Sleep3Richard F. Shore4Kathryn E. Arnold5Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK; Corresponding author at: Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK.Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UKAnimal and Plant Health Agency, National Agri-Food Innovation Campus, Sand Hutton YO41 1LZ, UKCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UKCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UKEnvironment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UKThe contamination of the environment with human pharmaceuticals is widespread and demand for such products is mounting globally. Wild vertebrates may be at particular risk from any effects from pharmaceuticals, because of the evolutionary conservation of drug targets. However, exposure of wildlife to pharmaceuticals is poorly characterised, partly due to challenges associated with detecting rapidly metabolised compounds. As part of a wider study on the behavioural effects of fluoxetine (Prozac) on Eurasian starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), we investigated which avian samples are best suited for detecting exposure to fluoxetine in free-living birds. We analysed plasma, various tissues and tail feathers (grown both in the wild and in captivity during the dosing period) from fluoxetine-treated birds (dosed daily with 0.035 mg kg−1 bodyweight for 28 weeks), and liver tissue and tail feathers from sham-dosed birds. We detected fluoxetine in only two of twelve plasma samples from dosed birds. In dosed birds, median concentrations of free fluoxetine/norfluoxetine in tissues (two hour post-final dose) were: 111.2/67.6 ng g−1 in liver, 29.6/5.7 ng g−1 in kidney, 14.2/4.0 ng g−1 in lung, 15.1/1.6 ng g−1 in brain. We estimated that fluoxetine would remain detectable in liver and kidney approximately 4.5 times longer (90 h) than in brain (20h). In dosed birds, fluoxetine was detected in feathers regrown during the dosing period (median concentration = 11.4 ng g−1) at concentrations significantly higher than in regrown feathers from control birds. Fluoxetine residues were detected in wild-grown feathers (grown before the birds were brought into captivity) at concentrations up to 27.0 ng g−1, providing some evidence of likely exposure in the wild. Our results show liver and kidney can be used for detecting fluoxetine in avian carcasses and provide a first indication that feathers may be useful for assessing exposure to fluoxetine, and possibly other pharmaceuticals. Keywords: Pharmaceuticals, Fluoxetine, Biomonitoring, Wild birds, Bioaccumulation, Feathershttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018326229
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophia E. Whitlock
M. Glória Pereira
Julie Lane
Darren Sleep
Richard F. Shore
Kathryn E. Arnold
spellingShingle Sophia E. Whitlock
M. Glória Pereira
Julie Lane
Darren Sleep
Richard F. Shore
Kathryn E. Arnold
Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
Environment International
author_facet Sophia E. Whitlock
M. Glória Pereira
Julie Lane
Darren Sleep
Richard F. Shore
Kathryn E. Arnold
author_sort Sophia E. Whitlock
title Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
title_short Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
title_full Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
title_fullStr Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
title_full_unstemmed Detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
title_sort detecting fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in wild bird tissues and feathers
publisher Elsevier
series Environment International
issn 0160-4120
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The contamination of the environment with human pharmaceuticals is widespread and demand for such products is mounting globally. Wild vertebrates may be at particular risk from any effects from pharmaceuticals, because of the evolutionary conservation of drug targets. However, exposure of wildlife to pharmaceuticals is poorly characterised, partly due to challenges associated with detecting rapidly metabolised compounds. As part of a wider study on the behavioural effects of fluoxetine (Prozac) on Eurasian starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), we investigated which avian samples are best suited for detecting exposure to fluoxetine in free-living birds. We analysed plasma, various tissues and tail feathers (grown both in the wild and in captivity during the dosing period) from fluoxetine-treated birds (dosed daily with 0.035 mg kg−1 bodyweight for 28 weeks), and liver tissue and tail feathers from sham-dosed birds. We detected fluoxetine in only two of twelve plasma samples from dosed birds. In dosed birds, median concentrations of free fluoxetine/norfluoxetine in tissues (two hour post-final dose) were: 111.2/67.6 ng g−1 in liver, 29.6/5.7 ng g−1 in kidney, 14.2/4.0 ng g−1 in lung, 15.1/1.6 ng g−1 in brain. We estimated that fluoxetine would remain detectable in liver and kidney approximately 4.5 times longer (90 h) than in brain (20h). In dosed birds, fluoxetine was detected in feathers regrown during the dosing period (median concentration = 11.4 ng g−1) at concentrations significantly higher than in regrown feathers from control birds. Fluoxetine residues were detected in wild-grown feathers (grown before the birds were brought into captivity) at concentrations up to 27.0 ng g−1, providing some evidence of likely exposure in the wild. Our results show liver and kidney can be used for detecting fluoxetine in avian carcasses and provide a first indication that feathers may be useful for assessing exposure to fluoxetine, and possibly other pharmaceuticals. Keywords: Pharmaceuticals, Fluoxetine, Biomonitoring, Wild birds, Bioaccumulation, Feathers
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018326229
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiaewhitlock detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
AT mgloriapereira detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
AT julielane detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
AT darrensleep detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
AT richardfshore detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
AT kathrynearnold detectingfluoxetineandnorfluoxetineinwildbirdtissuesandfeathers
_version_ 1725244484836392960