The conceptual relevance of assessment measures in patients with mild/mild‐moderate Alzheimer's disease

• Main Authors: Ann Hartry, Natalie V.J. Aldhouse, Tamara Al‐Zubeidi, Myrlene Sanon, Richard G. Stefanacci, Sarah L. Knight
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
• Series: Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
• Subjects: Mild/mild‐moderate Alzheimer's disease; Outcome measures; Patient‐reported outcome (PRO); Conceptual relevance; Quantitative survey; Qualitative interviews
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.07.006
• ISSN: 2352-8729

Abstract Introduction This study aims to evaluate the conceptual relevance of four measures of disease activity in patients with mild/mild‐moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD): (1) the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale; (2) the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Inventory; (3) the Neuropsychiatry Inventory; and (4) the Dependence Scale. Methods A conceptual model depicting patient experience of mild AD was developed via literature review; concepts were compared with the items of the four measures. Relevance of the concepts included in the four measures was evaluated by patients with mild AD in a survey and follow‐up interviews. Results The four measures assessed few of the symptoms/impacts of mild AD identified within the literature. Measured items addressing emotional impacts were deemed most relevant by participants but were included in the measures only superficially. Discussion The four assessment measures do not appear to capture the concepts most relevant to/important to patients with mild/mild‐moderate AD.