Registration of published randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Prospective trial registration is a powerful tool to prevent reporting bias. We aimed to determine the extent to which published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were registered and registered prospectively. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2005 to October 2...
Main Authors: | Ludovic Trinquart, Adam G. Dunn, Florence T. Bourgeois |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1168-6 |
Similar Items
-
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results
by: Rabia Bashir, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Clinical trial registration and reporting: a survey of academic organizations in the United States
by: Evan Mayo-Wilson, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
by: Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research
by: Guowei Li, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ (ICMJE) prospective registration policy and implications for outcome integrity: a cross-sectional analysis of trials published in high-impact specialty society journals
by: Anand D. Gopal, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)