Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community

The article considers the concept of resilience of the scientific community, which is novel for the Russian science. By applying the conceptual analysis, the key message of the paper suggests that not only is the term instrumental in describing the traits of modern Russian science, but also it shows...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: K. B. Zuev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2020-12-01
Series:Концепт: философия, религия, культура
Subjects:
Online Access:https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/431
id doaj-0f91eaf2e7ba4510a0340ec64b1f61a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0f91eaf2e7ba4510a0340ec64b1f61a12021-09-30T13:51:24ZengMGIMO University PressКонцепт: философия, религия, культура2541-88312619-05402020-12-014471610.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-7-16365Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific CommunityK. B. Zuev0Russian Academy of SciencesThe article considers the concept of resilience of the scientific community, which is novel for the Russian science. By applying the conceptual analysis, the key message of the paper suggests that not only is the term instrumental in describing the traits of modern Russian science, but also it shows possible solutions of further development of science. The relevance of introducing this notion into scientific circulation is justified by both external and internal reasons, i.e. the science reform and the need to reflect on scientific and organizational processes, as scientific institutions face substantial challenges in adapting to new realities. The term is considered in a time continuum, as case studies focus on the following areas: scientists’ perceptions on funding, dilemmas of stable and competitive financing of science, organizational culture, the future image as seen by scientists and the interaction with the media. Comparative perspective is also included. Among the categories used to describe the functions and the status of scientific communities, collective subject is one that can focus on active role of such communities, on the interconnectedness and interdependence of individuals in a group, the ability of a group to show various forms of joint activity, the ability of a group to self-reflection – just like resilience. However, using subject for scientific needs seems not always suitable, for the sense it has covers not all the aspects that arise in conducting empirical research. Resilience, in contrast, suits perfectly. Another advantage the term resilience provides is that it seems to be appropriate for outlining the processes generated inside the scientific region, since it allows describing not only scientists as individuals, but also a community as a whole. This thesis is illustrated by a brief overview of research on the resilience of organizations and the resilience of families. The paper concludes with applying resilience to practice, as the state of the psychological community is assessed through the lenses of the crisis of resilience as opposed to the crisis of identity.https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/431resilienceresilience of the scientific communityscientific culturehistory of sciencesocial beliefsinteraction between science and media
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. B. Zuev
spellingShingle K. B. Zuev
Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
Концепт: философия, религия, культура
resilience
resilience of the scientific community
scientific culture
history of science
social beliefs
interaction between science and media
author_facet K. B. Zuev
author_sort K. B. Zuev
title Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
title_short Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
title_full Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
title_fullStr Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Components of Resilience of a Scientific Community
title_sort cultural components of resilience of a scientific community
publisher MGIMO University Press
series Концепт: философия, религия, культура
issn 2541-8831
2619-0540
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The article considers the concept of resilience of the scientific community, which is novel for the Russian science. By applying the conceptual analysis, the key message of the paper suggests that not only is the term instrumental in describing the traits of modern Russian science, but also it shows possible solutions of further development of science. The relevance of introducing this notion into scientific circulation is justified by both external and internal reasons, i.e. the science reform and the need to reflect on scientific and organizational processes, as scientific institutions face substantial challenges in adapting to new realities. The term is considered in a time continuum, as case studies focus on the following areas: scientists’ perceptions on funding, dilemmas of stable and competitive financing of science, organizational culture, the future image as seen by scientists and the interaction with the media. Comparative perspective is also included. Among the categories used to describe the functions and the status of scientific communities, collective subject is one that can focus on active role of such communities, on the interconnectedness and interdependence of individuals in a group, the ability of a group to show various forms of joint activity, the ability of a group to self-reflection – just like resilience. However, using subject for scientific needs seems not always suitable, for the sense it has covers not all the aspects that arise in conducting empirical research. Resilience, in contrast, suits perfectly. Another advantage the term resilience provides is that it seems to be appropriate for outlining the processes generated inside the scientific region, since it allows describing not only scientists as individuals, but also a community as a whole. This thesis is illustrated by a brief overview of research on the resilience of organizations and the resilience of families. The paper concludes with applying resilience to practice, as the state of the psychological community is assessed through the lenses of the crisis of resilience as opposed to the crisis of identity.
topic resilience
resilience of the scientific community
scientific culture
history of science
social beliefs
interaction between science and media
url https://concept.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/431
work_keys_str_mv AT kbzuev culturalcomponentsofresilienceofascientificcommunity
_version_ 1716863141441175552