A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
Based on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations....
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Atmosphere |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341 |
id |
doaj-0fa40ed862c54616b6b412cb4d90a1af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0fa40ed862c54616b6b412cb4d90a1af2020-11-24T22:07:59ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332015-03-016334136010.3390/atmos6030341atmos6030341A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction SystemHanbin Zhang0Jing Chen1Xiefei Zhi2Yanan Wang3College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information & Science Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Numerical Weather Prediction of CMA, Beijing 100081, ChinaKey Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information & Science Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Meteorological Service of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310017, ChinaBased on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations. One month consecutive tests are implemented to evaluate the performance of both methods in the operational REPS environment. The perturbation characteristics are analyzed and ensemble forecast verifications are conducted; furthermore, a TC case is investigated. The main conclusions are as follows: the ETKF perturbations contain more power at small scales while the ones derived from downscaling contain more power at large scales, and the relative difference of the two types of perturbations on scales become smaller with forecast lead time. The growth of downscaling perturbations is more remarkable, and the downscaling perturbations have larger magnitude than ETKF perturbations at all forecast lead times. However, the ETKF perturbation variance can represent the forecast error variance better than downscaling. Ensemble forecast verification shows slightly higher skill of downscaling ensemble over ETKF ensemble. A TC case study indicates that the overall performance of the two systems are quite similar despite the slightly smaller error of DOWN ensemble than ETKF ensemble at long range forecast lead times.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341regional ensemble prediction systeminitial condition perturbation keywordensemble transform Kalman filterdynamical downscaling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hanbin Zhang Jing Chen Xiefei Zhi Yanan Wang |
spellingShingle |
Hanbin Zhang Jing Chen Xiefei Zhi Yanan Wang A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System Atmosphere regional ensemble prediction system initial condition perturbation keyword ensemble transform Kalman filter dynamical downscaling |
author_facet |
Hanbin Zhang Jing Chen Xiefei Zhi Yanan Wang |
author_sort |
Hanbin Zhang |
title |
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System |
title_short |
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System |
title_full |
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System |
title_sort |
comparison of etkf and downscaling in a regional ensemble prediction system |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Atmosphere |
issn |
2073-4433 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
Based on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations. One month consecutive tests are implemented to evaluate the performance of both methods in the operational REPS environment. The perturbation characteristics are analyzed and ensemble forecast verifications are conducted; furthermore, a TC case is investigated. The main conclusions are as follows: the ETKF perturbations contain more power at small scales while the ones derived from downscaling contain more power at large scales, and the relative difference of the two types of perturbations on scales become smaller with forecast lead time. The growth of downscaling perturbations is more remarkable, and the downscaling perturbations have larger magnitude than ETKF perturbations at all forecast lead times. However, the ETKF perturbation variance can represent the forecast error variance better than downscaling. Ensemble forecast verification shows slightly higher skill of downscaling ensemble over ETKF ensemble. A TC case study indicates that the overall performance of the two systems are quite similar despite the slightly smaller error of DOWN ensemble than ETKF ensemble at long range forecast lead times. |
topic |
regional ensemble prediction system initial condition perturbation keyword ensemble transform Kalman filter dynamical downscaling |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hanbinzhang acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT jingchen acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT xiefeizhi acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT yananwang acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT hanbinzhang comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT jingchen comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT xiefeizhi comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem AT yananwang comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem |
_version_ |
1725818200931696640 |