A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System

Based on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanbin Zhang, Jing Chen, Xiefei Zhi, Yanan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-03-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341
id doaj-0fa40ed862c54616b6b412cb4d90a1af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fa40ed862c54616b6b412cb4d90a1af2020-11-24T22:07:59ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332015-03-016334136010.3390/atmos6030341atmos6030341A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction SystemHanbin Zhang0Jing Chen1Xiefei Zhi2Yanan Wang3College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information & Science Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Numerical Weather Prediction of CMA, Beijing 100081, ChinaKey Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education College of Atmospheric Science, Nanjing University of Information & Science Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaCenter of Meteorological Service of Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310017, ChinaBased on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations. One month consecutive tests are implemented to evaluate the performance of both methods in the operational REPS environment. The perturbation characteristics are analyzed and ensemble forecast verifications are conducted; furthermore, a TC case is investigated. The main conclusions are as follows: the ETKF perturbations contain more power at small scales while the ones derived from downscaling contain more power at large scales, and the relative difference of the two types of perturbations on scales become smaller with forecast lead time. The growth of downscaling perturbations is more remarkable, and the downscaling perturbations have larger magnitude than ETKF perturbations at all forecast lead times. However, the ETKF perturbation variance can represent the forecast error variance better than downscaling. Ensemble forecast verification shows slightly higher skill of downscaling ensemble over ETKF ensemble. A TC case study indicates that the overall performance of the two systems are quite similar despite the slightly smaller error of DOWN ensemble than ETKF ensemble at long range forecast lead times.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341regional ensemble prediction systeminitial condition perturbation keywordensemble transform Kalman filterdynamical downscaling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanbin Zhang
Jing Chen
Xiefei Zhi
Yanan Wang
spellingShingle Hanbin Zhang
Jing Chen
Xiefei Zhi
Yanan Wang
A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
Atmosphere
regional ensemble prediction system
initial condition perturbation keyword
ensemble transform Kalman filter
dynamical downscaling
author_facet Hanbin Zhang
Jing Chen
Xiefei Zhi
Yanan Wang
author_sort Hanbin Zhang
title A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
title_short A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
title_full A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
title_fullStr A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of ETKF and Downscaling in a Regional Ensemble Prediction System
title_sort comparison of etkf and downscaling in a regional ensemble prediction system
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Based on the operational regional ensemble prediction system (REPS) in China Meteorological Administration (CMA), this paper carried out comparison of two initial condition perturbation methods: an ensemble transform Kalman filter (ETKF) and a dynamical downscaling of global ensemble perturbations. One month consecutive tests are implemented to evaluate the performance of both methods in the operational REPS environment. The perturbation characteristics are analyzed and ensemble forecast verifications are conducted; furthermore, a TC case is investigated. The main conclusions are as follows: the ETKF perturbations contain more power at small scales while the ones derived from downscaling contain more power at large scales, and the relative difference of the two types of perturbations on scales become smaller with forecast lead time. The growth of downscaling perturbations is more remarkable, and the downscaling perturbations have larger magnitude than ETKF perturbations at all forecast lead times. However, the ETKF perturbation variance can represent the forecast error variance better than downscaling. Ensemble forecast verification shows slightly higher skill of downscaling ensemble over ETKF ensemble. A TC case study indicates that the overall performance of the two systems are quite similar despite the slightly smaller error of DOWN ensemble than ETKF ensemble at long range forecast lead times.
topic regional ensemble prediction system
initial condition perturbation keyword
ensemble transform Kalman filter
dynamical downscaling
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/6/3/341
work_keys_str_mv AT hanbinzhang acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT jingchen acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT xiefeizhi acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT yananwang acomparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT hanbinzhang comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT jingchen comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT xiefeizhi comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
AT yananwang comparisonofetkfanddownscalinginaregionalensemblepredictionsystem
_version_ 1725818200931696640