Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research

This research study provides patient and caregiver perspectives as to whether or not to undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) research. A total of 51 interviews were conducted in a multi-site study including patients undergoing aDBS and their respective caregivers along with persons declini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Outram, Katrina A. Muñoz, Kristin Kostick-Quenet, Clarissa E. Sanchez, Lavina Kalwani, Richa Lavingia, Laura Torgerson, Demetrio Sierra-Mercado, Jill O. Robinson, Stacey Pereira, Barbara A. Koenig, Philip A. Starr, Aysegul Gunduz, Kelly D. Foote, Michael S. Okun, Wayne K. Goodman, Amy L. McGuire, Peter Zuk, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.734182/full
id doaj-0faba620c4a84b2dbd90e32896509816
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simon Outram
Katrina A. Muñoz
Kristin Kostick-Quenet
Clarissa E. Sanchez
Lavina Kalwani
Richa Lavingia
Laura Torgerson
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Jill O. Robinson
Stacey Pereira
Barbara A. Koenig
Philip A. Starr
Aysegul Gunduz
Aysegul Gunduz
Kelly D. Foote
Michael S. Okun
Wayne K. Goodman
Amy L. McGuire
Peter Zuk
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
spellingShingle Simon Outram
Katrina A. Muñoz
Kristin Kostick-Quenet
Clarissa E. Sanchez
Lavina Kalwani
Richa Lavingia
Laura Torgerson
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Jill O. Robinson
Stacey Pereira
Barbara A. Koenig
Philip A. Starr
Aysegul Gunduz
Aysegul Gunduz
Kelly D. Foote
Michael S. Okun
Wayne K. Goodman
Amy L. McGuire
Peter Zuk
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
Frontiers in Neuroscience
aDBS
altruism
decision-making
interviews
quality of life
research
author_facet Simon Outram
Katrina A. Muñoz
Kristin Kostick-Quenet
Clarissa E. Sanchez
Lavina Kalwani
Richa Lavingia
Laura Torgerson
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
Jill O. Robinson
Stacey Pereira
Barbara A. Koenig
Philip A. Starr
Aysegul Gunduz
Aysegul Gunduz
Kelly D. Foote
Michael S. Okun
Wayne K. Goodman
Amy L. McGuire
Peter Zuk
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
author_sort Simon Outram
title Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
title_short Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
title_full Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
title_fullStr Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
title_full_unstemmed Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
title_sort patient, caregiver, and decliner perspectives on whether to enroll in adaptive deep brain stimulation research
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2021-10-01
description This research study provides patient and caregiver perspectives as to whether or not to undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) research. A total of 51 interviews were conducted in a multi-site study including patients undergoing aDBS and their respective caregivers along with persons declining aDBS. Reasons highlighted for undergoing aDBS included hopes for symptom alleviation, declining quality of life, desirability of being in research, and altruism. The primary reasons for not undergoing aDBS issues were practical rather than specific to aDBS technology, although some persons highlighted a desire to not be the first to trial the new technology. These themes are discussed in the context of “push” factors wherein any form of surgical intervention is preferable to none and “pull” factors wherein opportunities to contribute to science combine with hopes and/or expectations for the alleviation of symptoms. We highlight the significance of study design in decision making. aDBS is an innovative technology and not a completely new technology. Many participants expressed value in being part of research as an important consideration. We suggest that there are important implications when comparing patient perspectives vs. theoretical perspectives on the choice for or against aDBS. Additionally, it will be important how we communicate with patients especially in reference to the complexity of study design. Ultimately, this study reveals that there are benefits and potential risks when choosing a research study that involves implantation of a medical device.
topic aDBS
altruism
decision-making
interviews
quality of life
research
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.734182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT simonoutram patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT katrinaamunoz patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT kristinkostickquenet patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT clarissaesanchez patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT lavinakalwani patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT richalavingia patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT lauratorgerson patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT demetriosierramercado patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT demetriosierramercado patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT jillorobinson patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT staceypereira patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT barbaraakoenig patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT philipastarr patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT aysegulgunduz patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT aysegulgunduz patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT kellydfoote patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT michaelsokun patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT waynekgoodman patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT amylmcguire patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT peterzuk patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
AT gabriellazaromunoz patientcaregiveranddeclinerperspectivesonwhethertoenrollinadaptivedeepbrainstimulationresearch
_version_ 1716839625839869952
spelling doaj-0faba620c4a84b2dbd90e328965098162021-10-07T05:35:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2021-10-011510.3389/fnins.2021.734182734182Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation ResearchSimon Outram0Katrina A. Muñoz1Kristin Kostick-Quenet2Clarissa E. Sanchez3Lavina Kalwani4Richa Lavingia5Laura Torgerson6Demetrio Sierra-Mercado7Demetrio Sierra-Mercado8Jill O. Robinson9Stacey Pereira10Barbara A. Koenig11Philip A. Starr12Aysegul Gunduz13Aysegul Gunduz14Kelly D. Foote15Michael S. Okun16Wayne K. Goodman17Amy L. McGuire18Peter Zuk19Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz20Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto RicoCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesProgram in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesFixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesFixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesFixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United StatesThis research study provides patient and caregiver perspectives as to whether or not to undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) research. A total of 51 interviews were conducted in a multi-site study including patients undergoing aDBS and their respective caregivers along with persons declining aDBS. Reasons highlighted for undergoing aDBS included hopes for symptom alleviation, declining quality of life, desirability of being in research, and altruism. The primary reasons for not undergoing aDBS issues were practical rather than specific to aDBS technology, although some persons highlighted a desire to not be the first to trial the new technology. These themes are discussed in the context of “push” factors wherein any form of surgical intervention is preferable to none and “pull” factors wherein opportunities to contribute to science combine with hopes and/or expectations for the alleviation of symptoms. We highlight the significance of study design in decision making. aDBS is an innovative technology and not a completely new technology. Many participants expressed value in being part of research as an important consideration. We suggest that there are important implications when comparing patient perspectives vs. theoretical perspectives on the choice for or against aDBS. Additionally, it will be important how we communicate with patients especially in reference to the complexity of study design. Ultimately, this study reveals that there are benefits and potential risks when choosing a research study that involves implantation of a medical device.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.734182/fullaDBSaltruismdecision-makinginterviewsquality of liferesearch