The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.

Amino acid substitutions in protein structures often require subtle backbone adjustments that are difficult to model in atomic detail. An improved ability to predict realistic backbone changes in response to engineered mutations would be of great utility for the blossoming field of rational protein...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel A Keedy, Ivelin Georgiev, Edward B Triplett, Bruce R Donald, David C Richardson, Jane S Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3410847?pdf=render
id doaj-0fafa1920b8342ebad92d96d402abcb8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fafa1920b8342ebad92d96d402abcb82020-11-24T21:55:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582012-01-0188e100262910.1371/journal.pcbi.1002629The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.Daniel A KeedyIvelin GeorgievEdward B TriplettBruce R DonaldDavid C RichardsonJane S RichardsonAmino acid substitutions in protein structures often require subtle backbone adjustments that are difficult to model in atomic detail. An improved ability to predict realistic backbone changes in response to engineered mutations would be of great utility for the blossoming field of rational protein design. One model that has recently grown in acceptance is the backrub motion, a low-energy dipeptide rotation with single-peptide counter-rotations, that is coupled to dynamic two-state sidechain rotamer jumps, as evidenced by alternate conformations in very high-resolution crystal structures. It has been speculated that backrubs may facilitate sequence changes equally well as rotamer changes. However, backrub-induced shifts and experimental uncertainty are of similar magnitude for backbone atoms in even high-resolution structures, so comparison of wildtype-vs.-mutant crystal structure pairs is not sufficient to directly link backrubs to mutations. In this study, we use two alternative approaches that bypass this limitation. First, we use a quality-filtered structure database to aggregate many examples for precisely defined motifs with single amino acid differences, and find that the effectively amplified backbone differences closely resemble backrubs. Second, we directly apply a provably-accurate, backrub-enabled protein design algorithm to idealized versions of these motifs, and discover that the lowest-energy computed models match the average-coordinate experimental structures. These results support the hypothesis that backrubs participate in natural protein evolution and validate their continued use for design of synthetic proteins.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3410847?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel A Keedy
Ivelin Georgiev
Edward B Triplett
Bruce R Donald
David C Richardson
Jane S Richardson
spellingShingle Daniel A Keedy
Ivelin Georgiev
Edward B Triplett
Bruce R Donald
David C Richardson
Jane S Richardson
The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Daniel A Keedy
Ivelin Georgiev
Edward B Triplett
Bruce R Donald
David C Richardson
Jane S Richardson
author_sort Daniel A Keedy
title The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
title_short The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
title_full The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
title_fullStr The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
title_full_unstemmed The role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
title_sort role of local backrub motions in evolved and designed mutations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Amino acid substitutions in protein structures often require subtle backbone adjustments that are difficult to model in atomic detail. An improved ability to predict realistic backbone changes in response to engineered mutations would be of great utility for the blossoming field of rational protein design. One model that has recently grown in acceptance is the backrub motion, a low-energy dipeptide rotation with single-peptide counter-rotations, that is coupled to dynamic two-state sidechain rotamer jumps, as evidenced by alternate conformations in very high-resolution crystal structures. It has been speculated that backrubs may facilitate sequence changes equally well as rotamer changes. However, backrub-induced shifts and experimental uncertainty are of similar magnitude for backbone atoms in even high-resolution structures, so comparison of wildtype-vs.-mutant crystal structure pairs is not sufficient to directly link backrubs to mutations. In this study, we use two alternative approaches that bypass this limitation. First, we use a quality-filtered structure database to aggregate many examples for precisely defined motifs with single amino acid differences, and find that the effectively amplified backbone differences closely resemble backrubs. Second, we directly apply a provably-accurate, backrub-enabled protein design algorithm to idealized versions of these motifs, and discover that the lowest-energy computed models match the average-coordinate experimental structures. These results support the hypothesis that backrubs participate in natural protein evolution and validate their continued use for design of synthetic proteins.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3410847?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielakeedy theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT ivelingeorgiev theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT edwardbtriplett theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT brucerdonald theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT davidcrichardson theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT janesrichardson theroleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT danielakeedy roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT ivelingeorgiev roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT edwardbtriplett roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT brucerdonald roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT davidcrichardson roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
AT janesrichardson roleoflocalbackrubmotionsinevolvedanddesignedmutations
_version_ 1725861625473269760