The Water Footprint of Food Aid

Food aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find tha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Jackson, Megan Konar, Arjen Y. Hoekstra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435
id doaj-0fc652e9c3594e5c9b19a4e443be7397
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0fc652e9c3594e5c9b19a4e443be73972020-11-25T00:10:56ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-05-01766435645610.3390/su7066435su7066435The Water Footprint of Food AidNicole Jackson0Megan Konar1Arjen Y. Hoekstra2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, USAUniversity of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500-AE Enschede, The NetherlandsFood aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find that the total water footprint of food aid was 10 km3 in 2005, which represents approximately 0.5% of the water footprint of food trade and 2.0% of the water footprint of land grabbing (i.e., water appropriation associated with large agricultural land deals). The United States is by far the largest food aid donor and contributes 82% of the water footprint of food aid. The countries that receive the most water embodied in aid are Ethiopia, Sudan, North Korea, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Notably, we find that there is significant overlap between countries that receive food aid and those that have their land grabbed. Multivariate regression results indicate that donor water footprints are driven by political and environmental variables, whereas recipient water footprints are driven by land grabbing and food indicators.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435ood aidwater footprintvirtual waterwater savingswater grabbing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicole Jackson
Megan Konar
Arjen Y. Hoekstra
spellingShingle Nicole Jackson
Megan Konar
Arjen Y. Hoekstra
The Water Footprint of Food Aid
Sustainability
ood aid
water footprint
virtual water
water savings
water grabbing
author_facet Nicole Jackson
Megan Konar
Arjen Y. Hoekstra
author_sort Nicole Jackson
title The Water Footprint of Food Aid
title_short The Water Footprint of Food Aid
title_full The Water Footprint of Food Aid
title_fullStr The Water Footprint of Food Aid
title_full_unstemmed The Water Footprint of Food Aid
title_sort water footprint of food aid
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Food aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find that the total water footprint of food aid was 10 km3 in 2005, which represents approximately 0.5% of the water footprint of food trade and 2.0% of the water footprint of land grabbing (i.e., water appropriation associated with large agricultural land deals). The United States is by far the largest food aid donor and contributes 82% of the water footprint of food aid. The countries that receive the most water embodied in aid are Ethiopia, Sudan, North Korea, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Notably, we find that there is significant overlap between countries that receive food aid and those that have their land grabbed. Multivariate regression results indicate that donor water footprints are driven by political and environmental variables, whereas recipient water footprints are driven by land grabbing and food indicators.
topic ood aid
water footprint
virtual water
water savings
water grabbing
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolejackson thewaterfootprintoffoodaid
AT megankonar thewaterfootprintoffoodaid
AT arjenyhoekstra thewaterfootprintoffoodaid
AT nicolejackson waterfootprintoffoodaid
AT megankonar waterfootprintoffoodaid
AT arjenyhoekstra waterfootprintoffoodaid
_version_ 1725406216394375168