The Water Footprint of Food Aid
Food aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find tha...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435 |
id |
doaj-0fc652e9c3594e5c9b19a4e443be7397 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0fc652e9c3594e5c9b19a4e443be73972020-11-25T00:10:56ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-05-01766435645610.3390/su7066435su7066435The Water Footprint of Food AidNicole Jackson0Megan Konar1Arjen Y. Hoekstra2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801, USAUniversity of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500-AE Enschede, The NetherlandsFood aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find that the total water footprint of food aid was 10 km3 in 2005, which represents approximately 0.5% of the water footprint of food trade and 2.0% of the water footprint of land grabbing (i.e., water appropriation associated with large agricultural land deals). The United States is by far the largest food aid donor and contributes 82% of the water footprint of food aid. The countries that receive the most water embodied in aid are Ethiopia, Sudan, North Korea, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Notably, we find that there is significant overlap between countries that receive food aid and those that have their land grabbed. Multivariate regression results indicate that donor water footprints are driven by political and environmental variables, whereas recipient water footprints are driven by land grabbing and food indicators.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435ood aidwater footprintvirtual waterwater savingswater grabbing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicole Jackson Megan Konar Arjen Y. Hoekstra |
spellingShingle |
Nicole Jackson Megan Konar Arjen Y. Hoekstra The Water Footprint of Food Aid Sustainability ood aid water footprint virtual water water savings water grabbing |
author_facet |
Nicole Jackson Megan Konar Arjen Y. Hoekstra |
author_sort |
Nicole Jackson |
title |
The Water Footprint of Food Aid |
title_short |
The Water Footprint of Food Aid |
title_full |
The Water Footprint of Food Aid |
title_fullStr |
The Water Footprint of Food Aid |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Water Footprint of Food Aid |
title_sort |
water footprint of food aid |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2015-05-01 |
description |
Food aid is a critical component of the global food system, particularly when emergency situations arise. For the first time, we evaluate the water footprint of food aid. To do this, we draw on food aid data from theWorld Food Programme and virtual water content estimates from WaterStat. We find that the total water footprint of food aid was 10 km3 in 2005, which represents approximately 0.5% of the water footprint of food trade and 2.0% of the water footprint of land grabbing (i.e., water appropriation associated with large agricultural land deals). The United States is by far the largest food aid donor and contributes 82% of the water footprint of food aid. The countries that receive the most water embodied in aid are Ethiopia, Sudan, North Korea, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Notably, we find that there is significant overlap between countries that receive food aid and those that have their land grabbed. Multivariate regression results indicate that donor water footprints are driven by political and environmental variables, whereas recipient water footprints are driven by land grabbing and food indicators. |
topic |
ood aid water footprint virtual water water savings water grabbing |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/6435 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicolejackson thewaterfootprintoffoodaid AT megankonar thewaterfootprintoffoodaid AT arjenyhoekstra thewaterfootprintoffoodaid AT nicolejackson waterfootprintoffoodaid AT megankonar waterfootprintoffoodaid AT arjenyhoekstra waterfootprintoffoodaid |
_version_ |
1725406216394375168 |