Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks

Abstract Networks of portfolio holdings exemplify how interdependence both between the agents and their assets can be a source of systemic vulnerability. We study a real-world holdings network and compare it with various alternative scenarios from randomization and rebalancing of the original invest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danilo Delpini, Stefano Battiston, Guido Caldarelli, Massimo Riccaboni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-07-01
Series:Applied Network Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-020-00278-y
id doaj-0ff31f9675664dba80835dc87157dba6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ff31f9675664dba80835dc87157dba62020-11-25T03:43:05ZengSpringerOpenApplied Network Science2364-82282020-07-015112010.1007/s41109-020-00278-yPortfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networksDanilo Delpini0Stefano Battiston1Guido Caldarelli2Massimo Riccaboni3Dept. of Economics and Business, University of SassariDept. of Banking and Finance, University of ZurichDept. of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, and European Centre for Living Technology, Ca’ Foscari University of VeniceIMT School for Advanced StudiesAbstract Networks of portfolio holdings exemplify how interdependence both between the agents and their assets can be a source of systemic vulnerability. We study a real-world holdings network and compare it with various alternative scenarios from randomization and rebalancing of the original investments. Scenarios generation relies on algorithms that satisfy the global constraints imposed by the numbers of outstanding shares in the market. We consider fixed-diversification models and diversification-maximizing replicas too. We extensively analyze the interplay between portfolio diversification and differentiation, and how the outreach of exogenous shocks depends on these factors as well as on the type of shock and the size of the network with respect to the market. We find that real portfolios are poorly diversified but highly similar, that portfolio similarity correlates with systemic fragility and that rebalancing can come with an increased similarity depending on the initial network configuration. We show that a large diversification gain is achieved through rebalancing but, noteworthy, that makes the network vulnerable in front of unselective shocks. Also, while the network is riskier in the presence of targeted shocks, it is safer than its random counterparts when it is stressed by widespread price downturns.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-020-00278-ySystemic riskNetwork modelsDynamics on networks
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Danilo Delpini
Stefano Battiston
Guido Caldarelli
Massimo Riccaboni
spellingShingle Danilo Delpini
Stefano Battiston
Guido Caldarelli
Massimo Riccaboni
Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
Applied Network Science
Systemic risk
Network models
Dynamics on networks
author_facet Danilo Delpini
Stefano Battiston
Guido Caldarelli
Massimo Riccaboni
author_sort Danilo Delpini
title Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
title_short Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
title_full Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
title_fullStr Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
title_full_unstemmed Portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
title_sort portfolio diversification, differentiation and the robustness of holdings networks
publisher SpringerOpen
series Applied Network Science
issn 2364-8228
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Networks of portfolio holdings exemplify how interdependence both between the agents and their assets can be a source of systemic vulnerability. We study a real-world holdings network and compare it with various alternative scenarios from randomization and rebalancing of the original investments. Scenarios generation relies on algorithms that satisfy the global constraints imposed by the numbers of outstanding shares in the market. We consider fixed-diversification models and diversification-maximizing replicas too. We extensively analyze the interplay between portfolio diversification and differentiation, and how the outreach of exogenous shocks depends on these factors as well as on the type of shock and the size of the network with respect to the market. We find that real portfolios are poorly diversified but highly similar, that portfolio similarity correlates with systemic fragility and that rebalancing can come with an increased similarity depending on the initial network configuration. We show that a large diversification gain is achieved through rebalancing but, noteworthy, that makes the network vulnerable in front of unselective shocks. Also, while the network is riskier in the presence of targeted shocks, it is safer than its random counterparts when it is stressed by widespread price downturns.
topic Systemic risk
Network models
Dynamics on networks
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-020-00278-y
work_keys_str_mv AT danilodelpini portfoliodiversificationdifferentiationandtherobustnessofholdingsnetworks
AT stefanobattiston portfoliodiversificationdifferentiationandtherobustnessofholdingsnetworks
AT guidocaldarelli portfoliodiversificationdifferentiationandtherobustnessofholdingsnetworks
AT massimoriccaboni portfoliodiversificationdifferentiationandtherobustnessofholdingsnetworks
_version_ 1724521341495803904