Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm

With the arrival of the cognitive paradigm during the latter half of the last century, the theoretical and scientific bases of neurorehabilitation have been linked to the knowledge developed in cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience. Although the knowledge generated by these discipline...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Martínez-Pernía
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00924/full
id doaj-100387ac1cba4a23802f07463d7783e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-100387ac1cba4a23802f07463d7783e32020-11-25T02:21:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-05-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.00924505199Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive ParadigmDavid Martínez-Pernía0David Martínez-Pernía1David Martínez-Pernía2Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Adolfo Ibáñez University, Santiago, ChileGeroscience Center for Brain Health and Metabolism (GERO), Santiago, ChileMemory and Neuropsychiatric Clinic (CMYN), Neurology Service, Hospital del Salvador and Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, ChileWith the arrival of the cognitive paradigm during the latter half of the last century, the theoretical and scientific bases of neurorehabilitation have been linked to the knowledge developed in cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience. Although the knowledge generated by these disciplines has made relevant contributions to neurological therapy, their theoretical premises may create limitations in therapeutic processes. The present manuscript has two main objectives: first, to explicitly set forth the theoretical bases of cognitive neurorehabilitation and critically analyze the repercussions that these premises have produced in clinical practice; and second, to propose the enactive paradigm to reinterpret perspectives on people with brain damage and their therapy (assessment and treatment). This analysis will show that (1) neurorehabilitation as a therapy underutilizes body-originated resources that aid in recovery from neurological sequelae (embrained therapy); (2) the therapeutic process is based exclusively on subpersonal explanation models (subpersonal therapy); and (3), neurorehabilitation does not take subjectivity of each person in their own recovery processes into account (anti-subjective therapy). Subsequently, and in order to attenuate or resolve the conception of embrained, subpersonal and anti-subjective therapy, I argue in support of incorporating the enactive paradigm in rehabilitation of neurological damage. It is proposed here under a new term, “experiential neurorehabilitation.” This proposal approaches neurological disease and its sequelae as alterations in dynamic interaction between the body structure and the environment in which the meaning of the experience is also altered. Therefore, when a person is not able to walk, remember the past, communicate a thought, or maintain efficient self-care, their impairments are not only a product of an alteration in a specific cerebral area or within information processing; rather, the sequelae of their condition stem from alterations in the whole living system and its dynamics with the environment. The objective of experiential neurorehabilitation is the recovery of the singular and concrete experience of the person, composed of physical and subjective life attributes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00924/fullenactionembodied consciousnessexperiential neurorehabilitationcognitive paradigmcognitive neurorehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
spellingShingle David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
Frontiers in Psychology
enaction
embodied consciousness
experiential neurorehabilitation
cognitive paradigm
cognitive neurorehabilitation
author_facet David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
David Martínez-Pernía
author_sort David Martínez-Pernía
title Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
title_short Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
title_full Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
title_fullStr Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm
title_sort experiential neurorehabilitation: a neurological therapy based on the enactive paradigm
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-05-01
description With the arrival of the cognitive paradigm during the latter half of the last century, the theoretical and scientific bases of neurorehabilitation have been linked to the knowledge developed in cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience. Although the knowledge generated by these disciplines has made relevant contributions to neurological therapy, their theoretical premises may create limitations in therapeutic processes. The present manuscript has two main objectives: first, to explicitly set forth the theoretical bases of cognitive neurorehabilitation and critically analyze the repercussions that these premises have produced in clinical practice; and second, to propose the enactive paradigm to reinterpret perspectives on people with brain damage and their therapy (assessment and treatment). This analysis will show that (1) neurorehabilitation as a therapy underutilizes body-originated resources that aid in recovery from neurological sequelae (embrained therapy); (2) the therapeutic process is based exclusively on subpersonal explanation models (subpersonal therapy); and (3), neurorehabilitation does not take subjectivity of each person in their own recovery processes into account (anti-subjective therapy). Subsequently, and in order to attenuate or resolve the conception of embrained, subpersonal and anti-subjective therapy, I argue in support of incorporating the enactive paradigm in rehabilitation of neurological damage. It is proposed here under a new term, “experiential neurorehabilitation.” This proposal approaches neurological disease and its sequelae as alterations in dynamic interaction between the body structure and the environment in which the meaning of the experience is also altered. Therefore, when a person is not able to walk, remember the past, communicate a thought, or maintain efficient self-care, their impairments are not only a product of an alteration in a specific cerebral area or within information processing; rather, the sequelae of their condition stem from alterations in the whole living system and its dynamics with the environment. The objective of experiential neurorehabilitation is the recovery of the singular and concrete experience of the person, composed of physical and subjective life attributes.
topic enaction
embodied consciousness
experiential neurorehabilitation
cognitive paradigm
cognitive neurorehabilitation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00924/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmartinezpernia experientialneurorehabilitationaneurologicaltherapybasedontheenactiveparadigm
AT davidmartinezpernia experientialneurorehabilitationaneurologicaltherapybasedontheenactiveparadigm
AT davidmartinezpernia experientialneurorehabilitationaneurologicaltherapybasedontheenactiveparadigm
_version_ 1724866494802690048