Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments

The ability to revise one’s certainty or confidence in a preceding choice is a critical feature of adaptive decision-making but the neural mechanisms underpinning this metacognitive process have yet to be characterized. In the present study, we demonstrate that the same build-to-threshold decision v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter R Murphy, Ian H Robertson, Siobhán Harty, Redmond G O'Connell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2015-12-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/11946
id doaj-102fe2d4a9874201ada077b82162ff18
record_format Article
spelling doaj-102fe2d4a9874201ada077b82162ff182021-05-05T00:10:49ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2015-12-01410.7554/eLife.11946Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgmentsPeter R Murphy0Ian H Robertson1Siobhán Harty2Redmond G O'Connell3Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Institute of Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandThe ability to revise one’s certainty or confidence in a preceding choice is a critical feature of adaptive decision-making but the neural mechanisms underpinning this metacognitive process have yet to be characterized. In the present study, we demonstrate that the same build-to-threshold decision variable signal that triggers an initial choice continues to evolve after commitment, and determines the timing and accuracy of self-initiated error detection reports by selectively representing accumulated evidence that the preceding choice was incorrect. We also show that a peri-choice signal generated in medial frontal cortex provides a source of input to this post-decision accumulation process, indicating that metacognitive judgments are not solely based on the accumulation of feedforward sensory evidence. These findings impart novel insights into the generative mechanisms of metacognition.https://elifesciences.org/articles/11946metacognitionerror detectiondecision-makingdiffusion modelEEG
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter R Murphy
Ian H Robertson
Siobhán Harty
Redmond G O'Connell
spellingShingle Peter R Murphy
Ian H Robertson
Siobhán Harty
Redmond G O'Connell
Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
eLife
metacognition
error detection
decision-making
diffusion model
EEG
author_facet Peter R Murphy
Ian H Robertson
Siobhán Harty
Redmond G O'Connell
author_sort Peter R Murphy
title Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
title_short Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
title_full Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
title_fullStr Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
title_full_unstemmed Neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
title_sort neural evidence accumulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The ability to revise one’s certainty or confidence in a preceding choice is a critical feature of adaptive decision-making but the neural mechanisms underpinning this metacognitive process have yet to be characterized. In the present study, we demonstrate that the same build-to-threshold decision variable signal that triggers an initial choice continues to evolve after commitment, and determines the timing and accuracy of self-initiated error detection reports by selectively representing accumulated evidence that the preceding choice was incorrect. We also show that a peri-choice signal generated in medial frontal cortex provides a source of input to this post-decision accumulation process, indicating that metacognitive judgments are not solely based on the accumulation of feedforward sensory evidence. These findings impart novel insights into the generative mechanisms of metacognition.
topic metacognition
error detection
decision-making
diffusion model
EEG
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/11946
work_keys_str_mv AT peterrmurphy neuralevidenceaccumulationpersistsafterchoicetoinformmetacognitivejudgments
AT ianhrobertson neuralevidenceaccumulationpersistsafterchoicetoinformmetacognitivejudgments
AT siobhanharty neuralevidenceaccumulationpersistsafterchoicetoinformmetacognitivejudgments
AT redmondgoconnell neuralevidenceaccumulationpersistsafterchoicetoinformmetacognitivejudgments
_version_ 1721476459709595648