Decisions under unpredictable losses

An experimental test of the descriptive adequacy of the extit{restated diversification principle} is presented. The principle postulates that risk-averse utility maximizers will pool risks for their mutual benefit, even if information is missing about the probabilities of losses. It is enough for pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2007-10-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71016.pdf
id doaj-1041f55f659a46269dd1aaf3a50027a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1041f55f659a46269dd1aaf3a50027a12021-05-02T02:13:11ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752007-10-012NA312316Decisions under unpredictable lossesAli AhmedAn experimental test of the descriptive adequacy of the extit{restated diversification principle} is presented. The principle postulates that risk-averse utility maximizers will pool risks for their mutual benefit, even if information is missing about the probabilities of losses. It is enough for people to assume that they face equal risks when they pool risks. The results of the experiment support the principle. http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71016.pdfGroup behaviorloss sharingunpredictable lossesexperimentrisk pooling.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Ahmed
spellingShingle Ali Ahmed
Decisions under unpredictable losses
Judgment and Decision Making
Group behavior
loss sharing
unpredictable losses
experiment
risk pooling.
author_facet Ali Ahmed
author_sort Ali Ahmed
title Decisions under unpredictable losses
title_short Decisions under unpredictable losses
title_full Decisions under unpredictable losses
title_fullStr Decisions under unpredictable losses
title_full_unstemmed Decisions under unpredictable losses
title_sort decisions under unpredictable losses
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2007-10-01
description An experimental test of the descriptive adequacy of the extit{restated diversification principle} is presented. The principle postulates that risk-averse utility maximizers will pool risks for their mutual benefit, even if information is missing about the probabilities of losses. It is enough for people to assume that they face equal risks when they pool risks. The results of the experiment support the principle.
topic Group behavior
loss sharing
unpredictable losses
experiment
risk pooling.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm71016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aliahmed decisionsunderunpredictablelosses
_version_ 1721496129402568704