On the mass difference between proton and neutron

The Cottingham formula expresses the electromagnetic part of the mass of a particle in terms of the virtual Compton scattering amplitude. At large photon momenta, this amplitude is dominated by short distance singularities associated with operators of spin 0 and spin 2. In the difference between pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Rusetsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Physics Letters B
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269321000277
id doaj-10451abf024846f19ffba1487e0959ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10451abf024846f19ffba1487e0959ff2021-02-25T04:16:42ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26932021-03-01814136087On the mass difference between proton and neutronJ. Gasser0H. Leutwyler1A. Rusetsky2Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandAlbert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, SwitzerlandHelmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (Theorie) and Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, Universität Bonn, Nussallee 14-16, D-53115 Bonn, Germany; Tbilisi State University, 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia; Corresponding author.The Cottingham formula expresses the electromagnetic part of the mass of a particle in terms of the virtual Compton scattering amplitude. At large photon momenta, this amplitude is dominated by short distance singularities associated with operators of spin 0 and spin 2. In the difference between proton and neutron, chiral symmetry suppresses the spin 0 term. Although the angular integration removes the spin 2 singularities altogether, the various pieces occurring in the standard decomposition of the Cottingham formula do pick up such contributions. These approach asymptotics extremely slowly because the relevant Wilson coefficients only fall off logarithmically. We rewrite the formula in such a way that the leading spin 2 contributions are avoided ab initio. Using a sum rule that follows from Reggeon dominance, the numerical evaluation of the e.m. part of the mass difference between proton and neutron yields mQED=0.58±0.16MeV. The result indicates that the inelastic contributions are small compared to the elastic ones.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269321000277Electromagnetic mass differencesDispersion relationsRegge behaviourStructure functionsProtons and neutronsCottingham formula
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Gasser
H. Leutwyler
A. Rusetsky
spellingShingle J. Gasser
H. Leutwyler
A. Rusetsky
On the mass difference between proton and neutron
Physics Letters B
Electromagnetic mass differences
Dispersion relations
Regge behaviour
Structure functions
Protons and neutrons
Cottingham formula
author_facet J. Gasser
H. Leutwyler
A. Rusetsky
author_sort J. Gasser
title On the mass difference between proton and neutron
title_short On the mass difference between proton and neutron
title_full On the mass difference between proton and neutron
title_fullStr On the mass difference between proton and neutron
title_full_unstemmed On the mass difference between proton and neutron
title_sort on the mass difference between proton and neutron
publisher Elsevier
series Physics Letters B
issn 0370-2693
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The Cottingham formula expresses the electromagnetic part of the mass of a particle in terms of the virtual Compton scattering amplitude. At large photon momenta, this amplitude is dominated by short distance singularities associated with operators of spin 0 and spin 2. In the difference between proton and neutron, chiral symmetry suppresses the spin 0 term. Although the angular integration removes the spin 2 singularities altogether, the various pieces occurring in the standard decomposition of the Cottingham formula do pick up such contributions. These approach asymptotics extremely slowly because the relevant Wilson coefficients only fall off logarithmically. We rewrite the formula in such a way that the leading spin 2 contributions are avoided ab initio. Using a sum rule that follows from Reggeon dominance, the numerical evaluation of the e.m. part of the mass difference between proton and neutron yields mQED=0.58±0.16MeV. The result indicates that the inelastic contributions are small compared to the elastic ones.
topic Electromagnetic mass differences
Dispersion relations
Regge behaviour
Structure functions
Protons and neutrons
Cottingham formula
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269321000277
work_keys_str_mv AT jgasser onthemassdifferencebetweenprotonandneutron
AT hleutwyler onthemassdifferencebetweenprotonandneutron
AT arusetsky onthemassdifferencebetweenprotonandneutron
_version_ 1724252148015824896