A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial

Background: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamza Yousuf, Sander van der Linden, Luke Bredius, G.A. (Ted) van Essen, Govert Sweep, Zohar Preminger, Eric van Gorp, Erik Scherder, Jagat Narula, Leonard Hofstra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-05-01
Series:EClinicalMedicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537021001619
id doaj-104fb7b9613343cbb19f4526a16d74b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-104fb7b9613343cbb19f4526a16d74b92021-05-28T05:04:10ZengElsevierEClinicalMedicine2589-53702021-05-0135100881A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trialHamza Yousuf0Sander van der Linden1Luke Bredius2G.A. (Ted) van Essen3Govert Sweep4Zohar Preminger5Eric van Gorp6Erik Scherder7Jagat Narula8Leonard Hofstra9Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 – 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Psychology, School of Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 – 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDutch Influenza Foundation, Amersfoort, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 – 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 – 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsMount Sinai, St. Luke's Hospital, New York, NY, USADepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117 – 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Corresponding author.Background: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the effectiveness of applying debunking to combat vaccine misinformation, and reduce vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Participants were recruited via a daily news show on Dutch Television, targeted to elderly viewers. The study was conducted in 980 elderly citizens during the October 2020 National Influenza Vaccination Campaign. Borrowing from the recent literature in behavioural science and psychology we conducted a two-arm randomized blinded parallel study, in which participants were allocated to exposure to a video containing social norms, vaccine information plus debunking of vaccination myths (intervention group, n = 505) or a video only containing vaccine information plus social norm (control group, n = 475). Participants who viewed either of the video's and completed both a pre- and post-intervention survey on vaccination trust and knowledge, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes of this study were improvement on vaccine knowledge and awareness. Findings: Participants were recruited from the 13th of October 2020 till the 16th of October 2020 and could immediately participate in the pre-intervention survey. Subsequently, eligible participants were randomly assigned to an interventional video and the follow-up survey, distributed through email on the 18th of October 2020, and available for participation till the 24th of October 2020. We found that exposure to the video with addition of debunking strategies on top of social norm modelling and information resulted in substantially stronger rejection of vaccination misconceptions, including the belief that: (1) vaccinations can cause Autism Spectrum Disorders; (2) vaccinations weaken the immune system; (3) influenza vaccination would hamper the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Additionally, we observed that exposure to debunking in the intervention resulted in enhanced trust in government. Interpretation: Utilizing debunking in media campaigns on top of vaccine information and social norm modeling is an effective means to combat misinformation and distrust associated with vaccination in elderly, and could help maximize grounds for the acceptance of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines. Funding: Dutch Influenza Foundation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537021001619VaccinesMisinformationPublic healthMedia psychologyDebunkingMedia intervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamza Yousuf
Sander van der Linden
Luke Bredius
G.A. (Ted) van Essen
Govert Sweep
Zohar Preminger
Eric van Gorp
Erik Scherder
Jagat Narula
Leonard Hofstra
spellingShingle Hamza Yousuf
Sander van der Linden
Luke Bredius
G.A. (Ted) van Essen
Govert Sweep
Zohar Preminger
Eric van Gorp
Erik Scherder
Jagat Narula
Leonard Hofstra
A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
EClinicalMedicine
Vaccines
Misinformation
Public health
Media psychology
Debunking
Media intervention
author_facet Hamza Yousuf
Sander van der Linden
Luke Bredius
G.A. (Ted) van Essen
Govert Sweep
Zohar Preminger
Eric van Gorp
Erik Scherder
Jagat Narula
Leonard Hofstra
author_sort Hamza Yousuf
title A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_short A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_full A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_fullStr A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_sort media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the netherlands: a digital randomised trial
publisher Elsevier
series EClinicalMedicine
issn 2589-5370
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Background: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the effectiveness of applying debunking to combat vaccine misinformation, and reduce vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Participants were recruited via a daily news show on Dutch Television, targeted to elderly viewers. The study was conducted in 980 elderly citizens during the October 2020 National Influenza Vaccination Campaign. Borrowing from the recent literature in behavioural science and psychology we conducted a two-arm randomized blinded parallel study, in which participants were allocated to exposure to a video containing social norms, vaccine information plus debunking of vaccination myths (intervention group, n = 505) or a video only containing vaccine information plus social norm (control group, n = 475). Participants who viewed either of the video's and completed both a pre- and post-intervention survey on vaccination trust and knowledge, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes of this study were improvement on vaccine knowledge and awareness. Findings: Participants were recruited from the 13th of October 2020 till the 16th of October 2020 and could immediately participate in the pre-intervention survey. Subsequently, eligible participants were randomly assigned to an interventional video and the follow-up survey, distributed through email on the 18th of October 2020, and available for participation till the 24th of October 2020. We found that exposure to the video with addition of debunking strategies on top of social norm modelling and information resulted in substantially stronger rejection of vaccination misconceptions, including the belief that: (1) vaccinations can cause Autism Spectrum Disorders; (2) vaccinations weaken the immune system; (3) influenza vaccination would hamper the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Additionally, we observed that exposure to debunking in the intervention resulted in enhanced trust in government. Interpretation: Utilizing debunking in media campaigns on top of vaccine information and social norm modeling is an effective means to combat misinformation and distrust associated with vaccination in elderly, and could help maximize grounds for the acceptance of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines. Funding: Dutch Influenza Foundation.
topic Vaccines
Misinformation
Public health
Media psychology
Debunking
Media intervention
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537021001619
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzayousuf amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT sandervanderlinden amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT lukebredius amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT gatedvanessen amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT govertsweep amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT zoharpreminger amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT ericvangorp amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT erikscherder amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT jagatnarula amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT leonardhofstra amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT hamzayousuf mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT sandervanderlinden mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT lukebredius mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT gatedvanessen mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT govertsweep mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT zoharpreminger mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT ericvangorp mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT erikscherder mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT jagatnarula mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT leonardhofstra mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
_version_ 1721424515184984064