Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Division of major vascular and biliary structures during major hepatectomies can be carried out either extrahepatically at the porta hepatic or intrahepatically during the parenchymal transection. In this retrospective study we test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gamaletsos Evangelos, Dafnios Nikolaos, Polydorou Andreas, Vassiliou Ioannis, Voros Dionysios, Theodoraki Kassiani, Arkadopoulos Nikolaos, Smyrniotis Vassileios, Daniilidou Kyriaki, Kannas Dimitrios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-08-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Online Access:http://www.wjso.com/content/4/1/59
id doaj-1077801814da41bcb9ebf2c800e85143
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1077801814da41bcb9ebf2c800e851432020-11-25T00:33:43ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192006-08-01415910.1186/1477-7819-4-59Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resectionsGamaletsos EvangelosDafnios NikolaosPolydorou AndreasVassiliou IoannisVoros DionysiosTheodoraki KassianiArkadopoulos NikolaosSmyrniotis VassileiosDaniilidou KyriakiKannas Dimitrios<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Division of major vascular and biliary structures during major hepatectomies can be carried out either extrahepatically at the porta hepatic or intrahepatically during the parenchymal transection. In this retrospective study we test the hypothesis that the intrahepatic technique is associated with less early biliary complications.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>150 patients who underwent major hepatectomies were retrospectively allocated into an intrahepatic group (n = 100) and an extrahepatic group (n = 50) based on the technique of hilar division. The two groups were operated by two different surgical teams, each one favoring one of the two approaches for hilar dissection. Operative data (warm ischemic time, operative time, blood loss), biliary complications, morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In extrahepatic patients, operative time was longer (245 ± 50 vs 214 ± 38 min, p < 0.05) while the overall complication rate (55% vs 52%), hospital stay (13 ± 7 vs 12 ± 4 days), bile leak rate (22% vs 20%) and mortality (2% vs 2%) were similar compared to intrahepatic patients. However, most (57%) bile leaks in extrahepatic patients were grade II (leaks that required non-operative interventional treatment, while most (70%) leaks in the intrahepatic group were grade I (leaks that resolved and presented two injuries (4%) of the remaining bile ducts (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Intrahepatic hilar division is as safe as extrahepatic hilar division in terms of intraoperative blood requirements, morbidity and mortality. The extrahepatic technique is associated with more severe bile leaks and biliary injuries.</p> http://www.wjso.com/content/4/1/59
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gamaletsos Evangelos
Dafnios Nikolaos
Polydorou Andreas
Vassiliou Ioannis
Voros Dionysios
Theodoraki Kassiani
Arkadopoulos Nikolaos
Smyrniotis Vassileios
Daniilidou Kyriaki
Kannas Dimitrios
spellingShingle Gamaletsos Evangelos
Dafnios Nikolaos
Polydorou Andreas
Vassiliou Ioannis
Voros Dionysios
Theodoraki Kassiani
Arkadopoulos Nikolaos
Smyrniotis Vassileios
Daniilidou Kyriaki
Kannas Dimitrios
Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
author_facet Gamaletsos Evangelos
Dafnios Nikolaos
Polydorou Andreas
Vassiliou Ioannis
Voros Dionysios
Theodoraki Kassiani
Arkadopoulos Nikolaos
Smyrniotis Vassileios
Daniilidou Kyriaki
Kannas Dimitrios
author_sort Gamaletsos Evangelos
title Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
title_short Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
title_full Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
title_fullStr Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
title_full_unstemmed Association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
title_sort association between biliary complications and technique of hilar division (extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic) in major liver resections
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2006-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Division of major vascular and biliary structures during major hepatectomies can be carried out either extrahepatically at the porta hepatic or intrahepatically during the parenchymal transection. In this retrospective study we test the hypothesis that the intrahepatic technique is associated with less early biliary complications.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>150 patients who underwent major hepatectomies were retrospectively allocated into an intrahepatic group (n = 100) and an extrahepatic group (n = 50) based on the technique of hilar division. The two groups were operated by two different surgical teams, each one favoring one of the two approaches for hilar dissection. Operative data (warm ischemic time, operative time, blood loss), biliary complications, morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In extrahepatic patients, operative time was longer (245 ± 50 vs 214 ± 38 min, p < 0.05) while the overall complication rate (55% vs 52%), hospital stay (13 ± 7 vs 12 ± 4 days), bile leak rate (22% vs 20%) and mortality (2% vs 2%) were similar compared to intrahepatic patients. However, most (57%) bile leaks in extrahepatic patients were grade II (leaks that required non-operative interventional treatment, while most (70%) leaks in the intrahepatic group were grade I (leaks that resolved and presented two injuries (4%) of the remaining bile ducts (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Intrahepatic hilar division is as safe as extrahepatic hilar division in terms of intraoperative blood requirements, morbidity and mortality. The extrahepatic technique is associated with more severe bile leaks and biliary injuries.</p>
url http://www.wjso.com/content/4/1/59
work_keys_str_mv AT gamaletsosevangelos associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT dafniosnikolaos associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT polydorouandreas associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT vassiliouioannis associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT vorosdionysios associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT theodorakikassiani associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT arkadopoulosnikolaos associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT smyrniotisvassileios associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT daniilidoukyriaki associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
AT kannasdimitrios associationbetweenbiliarycomplicationsandtechniqueofhilardivisionextrahepaticvsintrahepaticinmajorliverresections
_version_ 1725315199034982400