The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones

Artickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ján Matuškovič, Tünde Pokorná–Juríková
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mendel University Press 2007-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/
id doaj-10839d7ac19c48b2b44775ee467706f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10839d7ac19c48b2b44775ee467706f22020-11-25T00:19:57ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102007-01-01552535810.11118/actaun200755020053The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clonesJán Matuškovič0Tünde Pokorná–Juríková1Katedra ovocinárstva, vinohradníctva a vinárstva, Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovenská republikaKatedra odborových didaktík, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa, Nábrežie mládeže 91, 949 74 Nitra, Slovenská republikaArtickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results we can claim the highest increase of height in case of LKL 21 followed by clones LKL 16 and LKL 5. The lowest growth increase was typical for LKL 58 and LKL 66.In term of statistical evaluation the year can be considered as a statistically significant factor forming a growth intensity of clones during 2003–2005. The effect of year on growing processes is strong (ε2 = 0.96) while the participation of year with clone influenced the growth increase in medium size (ε2 = 0.42). LKL 21 and LKL 58 in comparison with other clones are the most disperatable in term of growth increase. Within mentioned clones statistically significant differences were recorded in 7 evaluated pairs. In the same way LKL 42 is very different from another clones as well. On the basis of all provided analysis the tested clones from point of wiev perspectivity of planting can be set up in the following order: LKL 21, LKL 16, LKL 5, LKL 42, LKL 49, LKL 96, LKL 6, LKL 60, LKL 66 and LKL 58. https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/<i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i>clonesgrowth dynamicsyearrepeatings
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ján Matuškovič
Tünde Pokorná–Juríková
spellingShingle Ján Matuškovič
Tünde Pokorná–Juríková
The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
<i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i>
clones
growth dynamics
year
repeatings
author_facet Ján Matuškovič
Tünde Pokorná–Juríková
author_sort Ján Matuškovič
title The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
title_short The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
title_full The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
title_fullStr The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of growth dynamics of Lonicera kamtschatica clones
title_sort evaluation of growth dynamics of lonicera kamtschatica clones
publisher Mendel University Press
series Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
issn 1211-8516
2464-8310
publishDate 2007-01-01
description Artickle deals with the evaluation of growth dynamics of selected set of clones Lonicera kamtschatica in the conditions of Nitra. We measured the growth of the shrubs twice a year (in spring and autumn) during 2003–2005. Within all clones 5 shrubs were evaluated. On the basis of the obtained results we can claim the highest increase of height in case of LKL 21 followed by clones LKL 16 and LKL 5. The lowest growth increase was typical for LKL 58 and LKL 66.In term of statistical evaluation the year can be considered as a statistically significant factor forming a growth intensity of clones during 2003–2005. The effect of year on growing processes is strong (ε2 = 0.96) while the participation of year with clone influenced the growth increase in medium size (ε2 = 0.42). LKL 21 and LKL 58 in comparison with other clones are the most disperatable in term of growth increase. Within mentioned clones statistically significant differences were recorded in 7 evaluated pairs. In the same way LKL 42 is very different from another clones as well. On the basis of all provided analysis the tested clones from point of wiev perspectivity of planting can be set up in the following order: LKL 21, LKL 16, LKL 5, LKL 42, LKL 49, LKL 96, LKL 6, LKL 60, LKL 66 and LKL 58.
topic <i>Lonicera kamtschatica</i>
clones
growth dynamics
year
repeatings
url https://acta.mendelu.cz/55/2/0053/
work_keys_str_mv AT janmatuskovic theevaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones
AT tundepokornajurikova theevaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones
AT janmatuskovic evaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones
AT tundepokornajurikova evaluationofgrowthdynamicsoflonicerakamtschaticaclones
_version_ 1725369521594695680