Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy Chen, MD, Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS, Alison Schultz, MD, Erik Nathan Hansen, MD, Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522
id doaj-10942aaa7dda4f3290177c38ab8ef96d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10942aaa7dda4f3290177c38ab8ef96d2021-07-01T04:34:17ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412021-06-0192934Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip ArthroplastyAmy Chen, MD0Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS1Alison Schultz, MD2Erik Nathan Hansen, MD3Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD4Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Corresponding author. 1500 Owens Street Suite 430, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Tel.: +1 415 353 2808.Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USABackground: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique and is relatively simple to perform. Our study aimed to evaluate whether continuous LESPB provided better analgesia and clinical outcomes than continuous LPB in revision hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: We compared 25 LPBs with 25 LESPBs performed from October 2017 to November 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of this study was difference in opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, hospital lengths of stay, pain adjunct consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: There was no significant difference in average opioid consumption between the LPB and LESPB groups during the first 24 hours postoperatively (73.8 ± 68.1 mg vs 85.1 ± 69.7 mg, respectively, P = .57). Similarly, there was no significant difference in average pain scores (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, respectively, P = .42). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in opioid consumption and pain scores in patients with continuous LESPB compared with those with continuous LPB. While our study did not show a difference in these outcomes, the LESPB is a straightforward regional block that avoids many of the risks of LPBs and may be as effective for pain control.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522Hip arthroplastyErector spinae plane blockLumbar plexus blockRegional anesthesiaAnalgesiaNerve block
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy Chen, MD
Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS
Alison Schultz, MD
Erik Nathan Hansen, MD
Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Amy Chen, MD
Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS
Alison Schultz, MD
Erik Nathan Hansen, MD
Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty Today
Hip arthroplasty
Erector spinae plane block
Lumbar plexus block
Regional anesthesia
Analgesia
Nerve block
author_facet Amy Chen, MD
Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS
Alison Schultz, MD
Erik Nathan Hansen, MD
Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD
author_sort Amy Chen, MD
title Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort continuous lumbar plexus block vs continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain control after revision total hip arthroplasty
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique and is relatively simple to perform. Our study aimed to evaluate whether continuous LESPB provided better analgesia and clinical outcomes than continuous LPB in revision hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: We compared 25 LPBs with 25 LESPBs performed from October 2017 to November 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of this study was difference in opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, hospital lengths of stay, pain adjunct consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: There was no significant difference in average opioid consumption between the LPB and LESPB groups during the first 24 hours postoperatively (73.8 ± 68.1 mg vs 85.1 ± 69.7 mg, respectively, P = .57). Similarly, there was no significant difference in average pain scores (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, respectively, P = .42). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in opioid consumption and pain scores in patients with continuous LESPB compared with those with continuous LPB. While our study did not show a difference in these outcomes, the LESPB is a straightforward regional block that avoids many of the risks of LPBs and may be as effective for pain control.
topic Hip arthroplasty
Erector spinae plane block
Lumbar plexus block
Regional anesthesia
Analgesia
Nerve block
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522
work_keys_str_mv AT amychenmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT kerstinkolodziemdphdmas continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT alisonschultzmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT eriknathanhansenmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
AT matthiasbraehlermdphd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty
_version_ 1721347354992312320