Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Background: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia tec...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Arthroplasty Today |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522 |
id |
doaj-10942aaa7dda4f3290177c38ab8ef96d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-10942aaa7dda4f3290177c38ab8ef96d2021-07-01T04:34:17ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412021-06-0192934Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip ArthroplastyAmy Chen, MD0Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS1Alison Schultz, MD2Erik Nathan Hansen, MD3Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD4Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Corresponding author. 1500 Owens Street Suite 430, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Tel.: +1 415 353 2808.Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USABackground: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique and is relatively simple to perform. Our study aimed to evaluate whether continuous LESPB provided better analgesia and clinical outcomes than continuous LPB in revision hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: We compared 25 LPBs with 25 LESPBs performed from October 2017 to November 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of this study was difference in opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, hospital lengths of stay, pain adjunct consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: There was no significant difference in average opioid consumption between the LPB and LESPB groups during the first 24 hours postoperatively (73.8 ± 68.1 mg vs 85.1 ± 69.7 mg, respectively, P = .57). Similarly, there was no significant difference in average pain scores (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, respectively, P = .42). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in opioid consumption and pain scores in patients with continuous LESPB compared with those with continuous LPB. While our study did not show a difference in these outcomes, the LESPB is a straightforward regional block that avoids many of the risks of LPBs and may be as effective for pain control.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522Hip arthroplastyErector spinae plane blockLumbar plexus blockRegional anesthesiaAnalgesiaNerve block |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amy Chen, MD Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS Alison Schultz, MD Erik Nathan Hansen, MD Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD |
spellingShingle |
Amy Chen, MD Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS Alison Schultz, MD Erik Nathan Hansen, MD Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Today Hip arthroplasty Erector spinae plane block Lumbar plexus block Regional anesthesia Analgesia Nerve block |
author_facet |
Amy Chen, MD Kerstin Kolodzie, MD, PhD, MAS Alison Schultz, MD Erik Nathan Hansen, MD Matthias Braehler, MD, PhD |
author_sort |
Amy Chen, MD |
title |
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty |
title_short |
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty |
title_full |
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr |
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block vs Continuous Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty |
title_sort |
continuous lumbar plexus block vs continuous lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain control after revision total hip arthroplasty |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Arthroplasty Today |
issn |
2352-3441 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Background: Optimal pain management is key to successful recovery in revision total hip arthroplasty. Lumbar plexus blocks (LPBs) have traditionally been used for postoperative pain management. Recently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique and is relatively simple to perform. Our study aimed to evaluate whether continuous LESPB provided better analgesia and clinical outcomes than continuous LPB in revision hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: We compared 25 LPBs with 25 LESPBs performed from October 2017 to November 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome of this study was difference in opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, hospital lengths of stay, pain adjunct consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: There was no significant difference in average opioid consumption between the LPB and LESPB groups during the first 24 hours postoperatively (73.8 ± 68.1 mg vs 85.1 ± 69.7 mg, respectively, P = .57). Similarly, there was no significant difference in average pain scores (3.3 ± 2.1 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, respectively, P = .42). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in opioid consumption and pain scores in patients with continuous LESPB compared with those with continuous LPB. While our study did not show a difference in these outcomes, the LESPB is a straightforward regional block that avoids many of the risks of LPBs and may be as effective for pain control. |
topic |
Hip arthroplasty Erector spinae plane block Lumbar plexus block Regional anesthesia Analgesia Nerve block |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000522 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amychenmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT kerstinkolodziemdphdmas continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT alisonschultzmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT eriknathanhansenmd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty AT matthiasbraehlermdphd continuouslumbarplexusblockvscontinuouslumbarerectorspinaeplaneblockforpostoperativepaincontrolafterrevisiontotalhiparthroplasty |
_version_ |
1721347354992312320 |