Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: This study investigated removal of a force-closed stem, done in order to improve acetabular exposure during revision, with reinsertion afterwards. It is unknown how much this procedure modifies the stem/cement interface. METHODS: Three tapered stem models were implanted into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandro Griza, Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes, André Cervieri, Telmo Roberto Strohaecker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2016-02-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100029&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-10a2f0bae4714742ba2ed35617587d12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10a2f0bae4714742ba2ed35617587d122020-11-24T21:21:31ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782016-02-01511293510.1016/j.rboe.2015.03.016S0102-36162016000100029Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplastySandro GrizaLuiz Sérgio Marcelino GomesAndré CervieriTelmo Roberto StrohaeckerABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: This study investigated removal of a force-closed stem, done in order to improve acetabular exposure during revision, with reinsertion afterwards. It is unknown how much this procedure modifies the stem/cement interface. METHODS: Three tapered stem models were implanted into composite femurs. Strain gauges were embedded in the medial aspect of the cement mantle and in several positions on the outer surface of the femurs. The deformation was measured during static loading, which was applied at two different times: after implantation and after one million loading cycles, followed by stem removal and reinsertion. The t test was performed. The differences in deformation were compared (at p ≤ 0.05) between the two static loading times and among the three stem designs. RESULTS: No significant differences in deformation were found after the two loading times for the three models. No significant differences in the initial deformations of the three models were found for most of the gauges attached to the femurs. CONCLUSIONS: Reinsertion of the force-closed stem does not alter the load transmission from the stem to the cement and to the surface of the femur, even after one million loading cycles.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100029&lng=en&tlng=enArtroplastia de quadrilDesenho de próteseFenômenos mecânicos
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandro Griza
Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes
André Cervieri
Telmo Roberto Strohaecker
spellingShingle Sandro Griza
Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes
André Cervieri
Telmo Roberto Strohaecker
Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Artroplastia de quadril
Desenho de prótese
Fenômenos mecânicos
author_facet Sandro Griza
Luiz Sérgio Marcelino Gomes
André Cervieri
Telmo Roberto Strohaecker
author_sort Sandro Griza
title Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
title_short Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
title_full Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
title_sort effect of removal and reinsertion of force-closed stems on deformation of total hip arthroplasty
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
issn 1982-4378
publishDate 2016-02-01
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: This study investigated removal of a force-closed stem, done in order to improve acetabular exposure during revision, with reinsertion afterwards. It is unknown how much this procedure modifies the stem/cement interface. METHODS: Three tapered stem models were implanted into composite femurs. Strain gauges were embedded in the medial aspect of the cement mantle and in several positions on the outer surface of the femurs. The deformation was measured during static loading, which was applied at two different times: after implantation and after one million loading cycles, followed by stem removal and reinsertion. The t test was performed. The differences in deformation were compared (at p ≤ 0.05) between the two static loading times and among the three stem designs. RESULTS: No significant differences in deformation were found after the two loading times for the three models. No significant differences in the initial deformations of the three models were found for most of the gauges attached to the femurs. CONCLUSIONS: Reinsertion of the force-closed stem does not alter the load transmission from the stem to the cement and to the surface of the femur, even after one million loading cycles.
topic Artroplastia de quadril
Desenho de prótese
Fenômenos mecânicos
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100029&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrogriza effectofremovalandreinsertionofforceclosedstemsondeformationoftotalhiparthroplasty
AT luizsergiomarcelinogomes effectofremovalandreinsertionofforceclosedstemsondeformationoftotalhiparthroplasty
AT andrecervieri effectofremovalandreinsertionofforceclosedstemsondeformationoftotalhiparthroplasty
AT telmorobertostrohaecker effectofremovalandreinsertionofforceclosedstemsondeformationoftotalhiparthroplasty
_version_ 1725999502046789632