Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts

Statement Validity Assessment (SVA) proposes that baseline statements on different events can serve as a within-subject measure of a witness’ individual verbal capabilities when evaluating scores from Criteria-based Content Analysis (CBCA). This assumes that CBCA scores will generally be consistent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonas Schemmel, Benjamin G Maier, Renate Volbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense 2019-12-01
Series:European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Subjects:
Online Access: https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2020a4
id doaj-10a868ad706e4a2fa2e422d19725a371
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10a868ad706e4a2fa2e422d19725a3712020-11-24T21:18:38ZengSociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y ForenseEuropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context1889-18611989-40072019-12-01121354210.5093/ejpalc2020a411320559Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated AccountsJonas Schemmel0Benjamin G Maier1Renate Volbert2Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Germany, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, GermanyPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Germany, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, GermanyPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Germany, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, GermanyStatement Validity Assessment (SVA) proposes that baseline statements on different events can serve as a within-subject measure of a witness’ individual verbal capabilities when evaluating scores from Criteria-based Content Analysis (CBCA). This assumes that CBCA scores will generally be consistent across two accounts by the same witness. We present a first pilot study on this assumption. In two sessions, we asked 29 participants to produce one experience-based and one fabricated baseline account as well as one experience-based and one fabricated target account (each on different events), resulting in a total of 116 accounts. We hypothesized at least moderate correlations between target and baseline indicating a consistency across both experience-based and fabricated CBCA scores, and that fabricated CBCA scores would be more consistent because truth-telling has to consider random event characteristics, whereas lies must be constructed completely by the individual witness. Results showed that differences in correlations between experience-based CBCA scores and between fabricated CBCA scores took the predicted direction (cexperience-based = .44 versus cfabricated =.61) but this difference was not statistically significant. As predicted, a subgroup of event-related CBCA criteria were significantly less consistent than CBCA total scores, but only in experience-based accounts. The discussion considers methodological issues regarding the usage of total CBCA scores and whether to measure consistency with correlation coefficients. It is concluded that more studies are needed with larger samples. https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2020a4 statement validityassessment (sva)criteria-based contentanalysis (cbca)consistencyverbal baseliningbaseline statementswithin-subject measure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonas Schemmel
Benjamin G Maier
Renate Volbert
spellingShingle Jonas Schemmel
Benjamin G Maier
Renate Volbert
Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
statement validity
assessment (sva)
criteria-based content
analysis (cbca)
consistency
verbal baselining
baseline statements
within-subject measure
author_facet Jonas Schemmel
Benjamin G Maier
Renate Volbert
author_sort Jonas Schemmel
title Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
title_short Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
title_full Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
title_fullStr Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
title_full_unstemmed Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
title_sort verbal baselining: within-subject consistency of cbca scores across different truthful and fabricated accounts
publisher Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
series European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
issn 1889-1861
1989-4007
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Statement Validity Assessment (SVA) proposes that baseline statements on different events can serve as a within-subject measure of a witness’ individual verbal capabilities when evaluating scores from Criteria-based Content Analysis (CBCA). This assumes that CBCA scores will generally be consistent across two accounts by the same witness. We present a first pilot study on this assumption. In two sessions, we asked 29 participants to produce one experience-based and one fabricated baseline account as well as one experience-based and one fabricated target account (each on different events), resulting in a total of 116 accounts. We hypothesized at least moderate correlations between target and baseline indicating a consistency across both experience-based and fabricated CBCA scores, and that fabricated CBCA scores would be more consistent because truth-telling has to consider random event characteristics, whereas lies must be constructed completely by the individual witness. Results showed that differences in correlations between experience-based CBCA scores and between fabricated CBCA scores took the predicted direction (cexperience-based = .44 versus cfabricated =.61) but this difference was not statistically significant. As predicted, a subgroup of event-related CBCA criteria were significantly less consistent than CBCA total scores, but only in experience-based accounts. The discussion considers methodological issues regarding the usage of total CBCA scores and whether to measure consistency with correlation coefficients. It is concluded that more studies are needed with larger samples.
topic statement validity
assessment (sva)
criteria-based content
analysis (cbca)
consistency
verbal baselining
baseline statements
within-subject measure
url https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2020a4
work_keys_str_mv AT jonasschemmel verbalbaseliningwithinsubjectconsistencyofcbcascoresacrossdifferenttruthfulandfabricatedaccounts
AT benjamingmaier verbalbaseliningwithinsubjectconsistencyofcbcascoresacrossdifferenttruthfulandfabricatedaccounts
AT renatevolbert verbalbaseliningwithinsubjectconsistencyofcbcascoresacrossdifferenttruthfulandfabricatedaccounts
_version_ 1726008121405472768