Verbal Baselining: Within-Subject Consistency of CBCA Scores across Different Truthful and Fabricated Accounts
Statement Validity Assessment (SVA) proposes that baseline statements on different events can serve as a within-subject measure of a witness’ individual verbal capabilities when evaluating scores from Criteria-based Content Analysis (CBCA). This assumes that CBCA scores will generally be consistent...
Main Authors: | Jonas Schemmel, Benjamin G Maier, Renate Volbert |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
2019-12-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2020a4
|
Similar Items
-
Assessment of juveniles testimonies’ validity
by: Dozortseva E.G., et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
L'impact de l'utilisation du protocole semi-structuré du NICHD et de l'âge des enfants sur les scores du CBCA : grilles standard et révisée
by: Morin, Sébastien
Published: (2012) -
L'impact de l'utilisation du protocole semi-structuré du NICHD et de l'âge des enfants sur les scores du CBCA : grilles standard et révisée
by: Morin, Sébastien
Published: (2012) -
Discerning truth from deception: The sincere witness profile
by: Fiorella Giusberti, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01) -
How Information on a Motive to Lie Influences CBCA-Based Ratings and Veracity Judgments
by: Jonas Schemmel, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)