The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective

This paper explores a connection between Romance and Greek on the one hand, and Bantu on the other. More specifically, we look at auxiliary placement in Rangi and clitic placement in Tobler Mussafia languages, with a special emphasis on Cypriot Greek, and argue that a common explanation for their di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stergios Chatzikyriakidis, Hannah Gibson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2017-02-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/135
id doaj-10b117e2b593436eb304a8d485aa2070
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10b117e2b593436eb304a8d485aa20702021-09-02T09:32:29ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352017-02-012110.5334/gjgl.13556The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspectiveStergios Chatzikyriakidis0Hannah Gibson1FLoV, University of Gothenburg, Dicksonsgatan 4, 41124, Gothenburg, SE; Open University of Cyprus, B1 33, Latsia 2220Department of Linguistics, SOAS University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London, WC1H 0XGThis paper explores a connection between Romance and Greek on the one hand, and Bantu on the other. More specifically, we look at auxiliary placement in Rangi and clitic placement in Tobler Mussafia languages, with a special emphasis on Cypriot Greek, and argue that a common explanation for their distribution can be found once a move into a dynamic framework is made. Rangi exhibits an unusual word order alternation in auxiliary constructions under which the position of the auxiliary appears to be sensitive to an element appearing at the left periphery of the clause. A similar sensitivity to a left-peripheral element can be seen to regulate clitic placement in Cypriot Greek (and generally in the so-called Tobler Mussafia clitic languages). The paper presents a parsing-oriented account of these two phenomena in the Dynamic Syntax framework, arguing that the similarities in syntactic distribution are the result of the encoding in the lexicon of processing strategies that were potentially pragmatic preferences in earlier stages of the respective languages. The account thus leans on the role played by the lexical entries for auxiliary and clitic forms, as well as the assumption that underspecification is inherent in the process of establishing meaning in context. The account is further supplemented by possible pathways of diachronic change that could have given rise to the systems found in present day varieties.http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/135BantuGreekgrammaticalisationlanguage changeparsing dynamicsDynamic ­SyntaxRomance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
Hannah Gibson
spellingShingle Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
Hannah Gibson
The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
Glossa
Bantu
Greek
grammaticalisation
language change
parsing dynamics
Dynamic ­Syntax
Romance
author_facet Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
Hannah Gibson
author_sort Stergios Chatzikyriakidis
title The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
title_short The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
title_full The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
title_fullStr The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
title_full_unstemmed The Bantu-Romance-Greek connection revisited: Processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
title_sort bantu-romance-greek connection revisited: processing constraints in auxiliary and clitic placement from a cross-linguistic perspective
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2017-02-01
description This paper explores a connection between Romance and Greek on the one hand, and Bantu on the other. More specifically, we look at auxiliary placement in Rangi and clitic placement in Tobler Mussafia languages, with a special emphasis on Cypriot Greek, and argue that a common explanation for their distribution can be found once a move into a dynamic framework is made. Rangi exhibits an unusual word order alternation in auxiliary constructions under which the position of the auxiliary appears to be sensitive to an element appearing at the left periphery of the clause. A similar sensitivity to a left-peripheral element can be seen to regulate clitic placement in Cypriot Greek (and generally in the so-called Tobler Mussafia clitic languages). The paper presents a parsing-oriented account of these two phenomena in the Dynamic Syntax framework, arguing that the similarities in syntactic distribution are the result of the encoding in the lexicon of processing strategies that were potentially pragmatic preferences in earlier stages of the respective languages. The account thus leans on the role played by the lexical entries for auxiliary and clitic forms, as well as the assumption that underspecification is inherent in the process of establishing meaning in context. The account is further supplemented by possible pathways of diachronic change that could have given rise to the systems found in present day varieties.
topic Bantu
Greek
grammaticalisation
language change
parsing dynamics
Dynamic ­Syntax
Romance
url http://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/135
work_keys_str_mv AT stergioschatzikyriakidis thebanturomancegreekconnectionrevisitedprocessingconstraintsinauxiliaryandcliticplacementfromacrosslinguisticperspective
AT hannahgibson thebanturomancegreekconnectionrevisitedprocessingconstraintsinauxiliaryandcliticplacementfromacrosslinguisticperspective
AT stergioschatzikyriakidis banturomancegreekconnectionrevisitedprocessingconstraintsinauxiliaryandcliticplacementfromacrosslinguisticperspective
AT hannahgibson banturomancegreekconnectionrevisitedprocessingconstraintsinauxiliaryandcliticplacementfromacrosslinguisticperspective
_version_ 1721177073632935936