Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
Picosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Micromachines |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316 |
id |
doaj-1104b65194a648f0887ca049b5cca52b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1104b65194a648f0887ca049b5cca52b2020-11-25T01:30:18ZengMDPI AGMicromachines2072-666X2017-10-0181131610.3390/mi8110316mi8110316Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in WaterIonut Nicolae0Mihaela Bojan1Cristian Viespe2Dana Miu3National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaPicosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, the diameter of the hole is larger in water than in air. In water, the diameter is larger at higher repetition rates than at lower ones, and increases with the number of pulses. In air, the hole diameter is not affected by the repetition rate, and remains constant from 100 to 100,000 pulses. Overall, material removal is more efficient in water than in air. The shape of the hole is generally more irregular in water, becoming more so as the number of pulses is increased. This is probably due to debris being trapped in the hole, since water flowing over the target surface cannot efficiently remove it. In aluminum, the depth of the hole is smaller at higher repetition rates. By scanning the beam over the aluminum target in water, the laser penetrates a 400-μm thick workpiece, generating a line with comparable widths at the entrance and exit surfaces.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316picosecond lasermicroprocessingablation in liquidrepetition rate |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ionut Nicolae Mihaela Bojan Cristian Viespe Dana Miu |
spellingShingle |
Ionut Nicolae Mihaela Bojan Cristian Viespe Dana Miu Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water Micromachines picosecond laser microprocessing ablation in liquid repetition rate |
author_facet |
Ionut Nicolae Mihaela Bojan Cristian Viespe Dana Miu |
author_sort |
Ionut Nicolae |
title |
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water |
title_short |
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water |
title_full |
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water |
title_fullStr |
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water |
title_sort |
repetition rate effects in picosecond laser microprocessing of aluminum and steel in water |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Micromachines |
issn |
2072-666X |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
Picosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, the diameter of the hole is larger in water than in air. In water, the diameter is larger at higher repetition rates than at lower ones, and increases with the number of pulses. In air, the hole diameter is not affected by the repetition rate, and remains constant from 100 to 100,000 pulses. Overall, material removal is more efficient in water than in air. The shape of the hole is generally more irregular in water, becoming more so as the number of pulses is increased. This is probably due to debris being trapped in the hole, since water flowing over the target surface cannot efficiently remove it. In aluminum, the depth of the hole is smaller at higher repetition rates. By scanning the beam over the aluminum target in water, the laser penetrates a 400-μm thick workpiece, generating a line with comparable widths at the entrance and exit surfaces. |
topic |
picosecond laser microprocessing ablation in liquid repetition rate |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ionutnicolae repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater AT mihaelabojan repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater AT cristianviespe repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater AT danamiu repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater |
_version_ |
1725092291389947904 |