Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water

Picosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ionut Nicolae, Mihaela Bojan, Cristian Viespe, Dana Miu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:Micromachines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316
id doaj-1104b65194a648f0887ca049b5cca52b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1104b65194a648f0887ca049b5cca52b2020-11-25T01:30:18ZengMDPI AGMicromachines2072-666X2017-10-0181131610.3390/mi8110316mi8110316Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in WaterIonut Nicolae0Mihaela Bojan1Cristian Viespe2Dana Miu3National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics, Laser Department, Atomistilor #409, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, RomaniaPicosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, the diameter of the hole is larger in water than in air. In water, the diameter is larger at higher repetition rates than at lower ones, and increases with the number of pulses. In air, the hole diameter is not affected by the repetition rate, and remains constant from 100 to 100,000 pulses. Overall, material removal is more efficient in water than in air. The shape of the hole is generally more irregular in water, becoming more so as the number of pulses is increased. This is probably due to debris being trapped in the hole, since water flowing over the target surface cannot efficiently remove it. In aluminum, the depth of the hole is smaller at higher repetition rates. By scanning the beam over the aluminum target in water, the laser penetrates a 400-μm thick workpiece, generating a line with comparable widths at the entrance and exit surfaces.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316picosecond lasermicroprocessingablation in liquidrepetition rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ionut Nicolae
Mihaela Bojan
Cristian Viespe
Dana Miu
spellingShingle Ionut Nicolae
Mihaela Bojan
Cristian Viespe
Dana Miu
Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
Micromachines
picosecond laser
microprocessing
ablation in liquid
repetition rate
author_facet Ionut Nicolae
Mihaela Bojan
Cristian Viespe
Dana Miu
author_sort Ionut Nicolae
title Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
title_short Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
title_full Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
title_fullStr Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
title_full_unstemmed Repetition Rate Effects in Picosecond Laser Microprocessing of Aluminum and Steel in Water
title_sort repetition rate effects in picosecond laser microprocessing of aluminum and steel in water
publisher MDPI AG
series Micromachines
issn 2072-666X
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Picosecond laser drilling was studied in the case of industrial steel and aluminum, which are difficult to microprocess by conventional methods. The dependence of hole morphology and dimensions on the pulse repetition rate and number of pulses in water and air were ascertained. For both materials, the diameter of the hole is larger in water than in air. In water, the diameter is larger at higher repetition rates than at lower ones, and increases with the number of pulses. In air, the hole diameter is not affected by the repetition rate, and remains constant from 100 to 100,000 pulses. Overall, material removal is more efficient in water than in air. The shape of the hole is generally more irregular in water, becoming more so as the number of pulses is increased. This is probably due to debris being trapped in the hole, since water flowing over the target surface cannot efficiently remove it. In aluminum, the depth of the hole is smaller at higher repetition rates. By scanning the beam over the aluminum target in water, the laser penetrates a 400-μm thick workpiece, generating a line with comparable widths at the entrance and exit surfaces.
topic picosecond laser
microprocessing
ablation in liquid
repetition rate
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/8/11/316
work_keys_str_mv AT ionutnicolae repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater
AT mihaelabojan repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater
AT cristianviespe repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater
AT danamiu repetitionrateeffectsinpicosecondlasermicroprocessingofaluminumandsteelinwater
_version_ 1725092291389947904