Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis

Background: Temporal changes in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may have implications in determining the etiology for implant failure. The purpose of this study was to 1) perform an epidemiologic analysis of etiologies that required rTKA and 2) determine whether temporal changes existed for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Kerzner, BS, Kyle N. Kunze, MD, Michael B. O’Sullivan, MD, Karan Pandher, BS, Brett R. Levine, MD, MS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000558
id doaj-1114c23423794ff3893767d59f646383
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1114c23423794ff3893767d59f6463832021-07-01T04:34:18ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412021-06-0196872Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological AnalysisBenjamin Kerzner, BS0Kyle N. Kunze, MD1Michael B. O’Sullivan, MD2Karan Pandher, BS3Brett R. Levine, MD, MS4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Corresponding author. 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USABackground: Temporal changes in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may have implications in determining the etiology for implant failure. The purpose of this study was to 1) perform an epidemiologic analysis of etiologies that required rTKA and 2) determine whether temporal changes existed for revision over the study period. Methods: All rTKA procedures performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. Revision procedures were stratified into 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2019, to assess for changes over time. Patients’ electronic medical record, operative report, and radiographs were reviewed to ensure diagnosis information was accurately documented in relation to the predominate etiology necessitating the revision procedure. Results: Three thousand and nine patients undergoing rTKA between 2009 and 2019 were identified with a mean age of 64.6 years. A total of 1,666 (55.4%) patients were female, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (2,306, 76.6%). The 3 most frequent rTKA etiologies were aseptic loosening (35.1%), periprosthetic infection (33.2%), and instability (16.0%). A higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for arthrofibrosis (5.1% vs 3.4%, P = .023) and periprosthetic joint infection (38.9% vs 28.6%, P < .001) between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability (12.6% vs 18.8%, P < .001) between 2014 and 2019. Conclusion: Aseptic loosening was the most common cause for rTKA over the last decade. rTKA for arthrofibrosis and periprosthetic joint infection was more frequent between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability in 2014-2019. Future studies will need to focus on identifying and reducing risk factors for the trending causes of rTKA.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000558EpidemiologyKnee arthroplastyRevisionAseptic loosening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Kerzner, BS
Kyle N. Kunze, MD
Michael B. O’Sullivan, MD
Karan Pandher, BS
Brett R. Levine, MD, MS
spellingShingle Benjamin Kerzner, BS
Kyle N. Kunze, MD
Michael B. O’Sullivan, MD
Karan Pandher, BS
Brett R. Levine, MD, MS
Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
Arthroplasty Today
Epidemiology
Knee arthroplasty
Revision
Aseptic loosening
author_facet Benjamin Kerzner, BS
Kyle N. Kunze, MD
Michael B. O’Sullivan, MD
Karan Pandher, BS
Brett R. Levine, MD, MS
author_sort Benjamin Kerzner, BS
title Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
title_short Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
title_full Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
title_fullStr Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis
title_sort temporal trends of revision etiologies in total knee arthroplasty at a single high-volume institution: an epidemiological analysis
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background: Temporal changes in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) may have implications in determining the etiology for implant failure. The purpose of this study was to 1) perform an epidemiologic analysis of etiologies that required rTKA and 2) determine whether temporal changes existed for revision over the study period. Methods: All rTKA procedures performed at a single institution from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed. Revision procedures were stratified into 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2019, to assess for changes over time. Patients’ electronic medical record, operative report, and radiographs were reviewed to ensure diagnosis information was accurately documented in relation to the predominate etiology necessitating the revision procedure. Results: Three thousand and nine patients undergoing rTKA between 2009 and 2019 were identified with a mean age of 64.6 years. A total of 1,666 (55.4%) patients were female, and the majority of patients were Caucasian (2,306, 76.6%). The 3 most frequent rTKA etiologies were aseptic loosening (35.1%), periprosthetic infection (33.2%), and instability (16.0%). A higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for arthrofibrosis (5.1% vs 3.4%, P = .023) and periprosthetic joint infection (38.9% vs 28.6%, P < .001) between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability (12.6% vs 18.8%, P < .001) between 2014 and 2019. Conclusion: Aseptic loosening was the most common cause for rTKA over the last decade. rTKA for arthrofibrosis and periprosthetic joint infection was more frequent between 2009 and 2013, while a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent rTKA for instability in 2014-2019. Future studies will need to focus on identifying and reducing risk factors for the trending causes of rTKA.
topic Epidemiology
Knee arthroplasty
Revision
Aseptic loosening
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344121000558
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminkerznerbs temporaltrendsofrevisionetiologiesintotalkneearthroplastyatasinglehighvolumeinstitutionanepidemiologicalanalysis
AT kylenkunzemd temporaltrendsofrevisionetiologiesintotalkneearthroplastyatasinglehighvolumeinstitutionanepidemiologicalanalysis
AT michaelbosullivanmd temporaltrendsofrevisionetiologiesintotalkneearthroplastyatasinglehighvolumeinstitutionanepidemiologicalanalysis
AT karanpandherbs temporaltrendsofrevisionetiologiesintotalkneearthroplastyatasinglehighvolumeinstitutionanepidemiologicalanalysis
AT brettrlevinemdms temporaltrendsofrevisionetiologiesintotalkneearthroplastyatasinglehighvolumeinstitutionanepidemiologicalanalysis
_version_ 1721347356134211584