Exploring User-Related Drivers of the Early Acceptance of Certified Digital Stress Prevention Programs in Germany

Electronic mental health services represent innovative instruments to increase the dissemination of stress programs in primary prevention. However, little is known about facilitators of their uptake. This study aimed to explore determinants of the acceptance of centrally certified digital stress cop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, Severin Hennemann, Christina Kück, Alexandra Wodner, Dorota Geibel, Marlies Riebschläger, Martin Zeißler, Bernhard Breil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-03-01
Series:Health Services Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632920911061
Description
Summary:Electronic mental health services represent innovative instruments to increase the dissemination of stress programs in primary prevention. However, little is known about facilitators of their uptake. This study aimed to explore determinants of the acceptance of centrally certified digital stress coping programs and preferences for service delivery modes among adult members of German statutory health insurances. Participants completed a multi-construct 45-item questionnaire covering acceptance of digital stress prevention (behavioral use intention) and potential predictors we assessed using hierarchical regression analysis—(1) socio-demographic variables and time spent online, (2) openness to experience, (3) perceived stress, and (4) attitudes toward e-mental health. Preferences in terms of the willingness to use online, face-to-face and blended programs were analyzed using paired t-tests. Participants (N = 171, 66% female, 18-69 years) reported a moderate acceptance of digital stress management ( M  = 2.76, SD = 1.16, range: 1-5). We identified younger age (ß = -0.16, P  = .009), openness to experience (ß = 0.17, P  = .003), and positive attitudes (ß = 0.61, P  < .001) as predictors of acceptance ( R 2  = .50, P  < .001). Face-to-face was preferred over online (d = 0.40) and blended (d = 0.33), and blended over stand-alone online delivery mode (d = 0.19; all P  < .001). Our findings indicate that promoting favorable attitudes toward digital stress prevention through tailored information may be a starting point to facilitate their adoption.
ISSN:1178-6329