Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: As inflammation following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is both beneficial and deleterious, there is a need to find new biomarkers of STEMI severity.Objective: We hypothesized that the circulating concentration of the soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptors 1 and 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Paccalet, Claire Crola Da Silva, Laura Mechtouff, Camille Amaz, Yvonne Varillon, Charles de Bourguignon, Regine Cartier, Cyril Prieur, Danka Tomasevic, Nathalie Genot, Simon Leboube, François Derimay, Gilles Rioufol, Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz, Nathan Mewton, Michel Ovize, Gabriel Bidaux, Thomas Bochaton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
TNF
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.656928/full
id doaj-1148873a618349bab3442a5f4f3cc44f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandre Paccalet
Claire Crola Da Silva
Laura Mechtouff
Camille Amaz
Yvonne Varillon
Charles de Bourguignon
Regine Cartier
Cyril Prieur
Danka Tomasevic
Nathalie Genot
Simon Leboube
François Derimay
Gilles Rioufol
Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz
Nathan Mewton
Nathan Mewton
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Gabriel Bidaux
Thomas Bochaton
Thomas Bochaton
spellingShingle Alexandre Paccalet
Claire Crola Da Silva
Laura Mechtouff
Camille Amaz
Yvonne Varillon
Charles de Bourguignon
Regine Cartier
Cyril Prieur
Danka Tomasevic
Nathalie Genot
Simon Leboube
François Derimay
Gilles Rioufol
Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz
Nathan Mewton
Nathan Mewton
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Gabriel Bidaux
Thomas Bochaton
Thomas Bochaton
Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Frontiers in Pharmacology
myocardial infarction
TNF
soluble TNF receptor
biomarker
prognosis
author_facet Alexandre Paccalet
Claire Crola Da Silva
Laura Mechtouff
Camille Amaz
Yvonne Varillon
Charles de Bourguignon
Regine Cartier
Cyril Prieur
Danka Tomasevic
Nathalie Genot
Simon Leboube
François Derimay
Gilles Rioufol
Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz
Nathan Mewton
Nathan Mewton
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Michel Ovize
Gabriel Bidaux
Thomas Bochaton
Thomas Bochaton
author_sort Alexandre Paccalet
title Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort serum soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 are early prognosis markers after st-segment elevation myocardial infarction
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
issn 1663-9812
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Background: As inflammation following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is both beneficial and deleterious, there is a need to find new biomarkers of STEMI severity.Objective: We hypothesized that the circulating concentration of the soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptors 1 and 2 (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) might predict clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.Methods: We enrolled into a prospective cohort 251 consecutive STEMI patients referred to our hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization. Blood samples were collected at five time points: admission and 4, 24, 48 h, and 1 month after admission to assess sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 serum concentrations. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1 month.Results: sTNFR1 concentration increased at 24 h with a median of 580.5 pg/ml [95% confidence interval (CI): 534.4–645.6]. sTNFR2 increased at 48 h with a median of 2,244.0 pg/ml [95% CI: 2090.0–2,399.0]. Both sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 peak levels were correlated with infarct size and left ventricular end-diastolic volume and inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with sTNFR1 or sTNFR2 concentration above the median value were more likely to experience an adverse clinical event within 24 months after STEMI [hazards ratio (HR): 8.8, 95% CI: 4.2–18.6, p < 0.0001 for sTNFR1; HR: 6.1, 95% CI: 2.5 –10.5, p = 0.0003 for sTNFR2]. Soluble TNFR1 was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events and was more powerful than troponin I (p = 0.04 as compared to the troponin AUC).Conclusion: The circulating sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are inflammatory markers of morphological and functional injury after STEMI. sTNFR1 appears as an early independent predictor of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.
topic myocardial infarction
TNF
soluble TNF receptor
biomarker
prognosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.656928/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrepaccalet serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT clairecroladasilva serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT lauramechtouff serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT camilleamaz serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT yvonnevarillon serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT charlesdebourguignon serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT reginecartier serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT cyrilprieur serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT dankatomasevic serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT nathaliegenot serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT simonleboube serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT francoisderimay serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT gillesrioufol serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT ericbonnefoycudraz serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT nathanmewton serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT nathanmewton serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT michelovize serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT michelovize serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT michelovize serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT gabrielbidaux serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT thomasbochaton serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT thomasbochaton serumsolubletumornecrosisfactorreceptors1and2areearlyprognosismarkersafterstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1717815647095750656
spelling doaj-1148873a618349bab3442a5f4f3cc44f2021-09-04T00:19:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122021-09-011210.3389/fphar.2021.656928656928Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors 1 and 2 Are Early Prognosis Markers After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAlexandre Paccalet0Claire Crola Da Silva1Laura Mechtouff2Camille Amaz3Yvonne Varillon4Charles de Bourguignon5Regine Cartier6Cyril Prieur7Danka Tomasevic8Nathalie Genot9Simon Leboube10François Derimay11Gilles Rioufol12Eric Bonnefoy-Cudraz13Nathan Mewton14Nathan Mewton15Michel Ovize16Michel Ovize17Michel Ovize18Gabriel Bidaux19Thomas Bochaton20Thomas Bochaton21INSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceStroke Department, Hôpital Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre D’investigation Clinique de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre D’investigation Clinique de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre D’investigation Clinique de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre de Biologie Est, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceUnité de Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques, Hôpital Louis Pradel et Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceUnité de Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques, Hôpital Louis Pradel et Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceUnité de Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques, Hôpital Louis Pradel et Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Hospital and Claude-Bernard University, Bron, FranceDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Hospital and Claude-Bernard University, Bron, FranceUnité de Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques, Hôpital Louis Pradel et Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre D’investigation Clinique de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceCentre D’investigation Clinique de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceService D’explorations Fonctionnelles Cardiovasculaires, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceINSERM U1060, CarMeN Laboratory, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Université de Lyon, Bron, FranceUnité de Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques, Hôpital Louis Pradel et Université Claude Bernard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, FranceBackground: As inflammation following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is both beneficial and deleterious, there is a need to find new biomarkers of STEMI severity.Objective: We hypothesized that the circulating concentration of the soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptors 1 and 2 (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) might predict clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.Methods: We enrolled into a prospective cohort 251 consecutive STEMI patients referred to our hospital for percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization. Blood samples were collected at five time points: admission and 4, 24, 48 h, and 1 month after admission to assess sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 serum concentrations. Patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 1 month.Results: sTNFR1 concentration increased at 24 h with a median of 580.5 pg/ml [95% confidence interval (CI): 534.4–645.6]. sTNFR2 increased at 48 h with a median of 2,244.0 pg/ml [95% CI: 2090.0–2,399.0]. Both sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 peak levels were correlated with infarct size and left ventricular end-diastolic volume and inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with sTNFR1 or sTNFR2 concentration above the median value were more likely to experience an adverse clinical event within 24 months after STEMI [hazards ratio (HR): 8.8, 95% CI: 4.2–18.6, p < 0.0001 for sTNFR1; HR: 6.1, 95% CI: 2.5 –10.5, p = 0.0003 for sTNFR2]. Soluble TNFR1 was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events and was more powerful than troponin I (p = 0.04 as compared to the troponin AUC).Conclusion: The circulating sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are inflammatory markers of morphological and functional injury after STEMI. sTNFR1 appears as an early independent predictor of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.656928/fullmyocardial infarctionTNFsoluble TNF receptorbiomarkerprognosis