Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005)
Why do democracies survive or break down? In this paper, it returns to this classic question with an empirical focus on Latin America from 1945 to 2005. The argument deviates from the quantitative literature and a good part of the qualitative literature on democratic survival and breakdown. It is ar...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
2014-12-01
|
Series: | América Latina Hoy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/12326 |
id |
doaj-116c4040863a40e18f10ab0fe701556c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-116c4040863a40e18f10ab0fe701556c2020-11-25T03:42:30ZspaEdiciones Universidad de SalamancaAmérica Latina Hoy1130-28872340-43962014-12-0168013916810.14201/alh20146813916811524Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005)Aníbal PÉREZ-LIÑÁN0Scott MAINWARING1University of PittsburghUniversity of Notre DamWhy do democracies survive or break down? In this paper, it returns to this classic question with an empirical focus on Latin America from 1945 to 2005. The argument deviates from the quantitative literature and a good part of the qualitative literature on democratic survival and breakdown. It is argued that structural variables such as the level of development and inequalities have not shaped prospects for democratic survival in Latin America. Nor, contrary to findings in some of the literature, has economic performance affected the survival of competitive regimes. Instead, it is focused on the regional political environment and on actors’ normative preferences about democracy and dictatorship and their policy radicalism or moderation. It is argued that 1) a higher level of development did not increase the likelihood of democratic survival in Latin America over this long time; 2) if actors have a normative preference for democracy, it is more likely to survive; and 3) policy moderation facilitates democratic survival.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/12326democraciadictaduraactores políticospreferencias normativasradicalismo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aníbal PÉREZ-LIÑÁN Scott MAINWARING |
spellingShingle |
Aníbal PÉREZ-LIÑÁN Scott MAINWARING Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) América Latina Hoy democracia dictadura actores políticos preferencias normativas radicalismo |
author_facet |
Aníbal PÉREZ-LIÑÁN Scott MAINWARING |
author_sort |
Aníbal PÉREZ-LIÑÁN |
title |
Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) |
title_short |
Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) |
title_full |
Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) |
title_fullStr |
Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Democratic survival in Latin America (1945-2005) |
title_sort |
democratic survival in latin america (1945-2005) |
publisher |
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |
series |
América Latina Hoy |
issn |
1130-2887 2340-4396 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
Why do democracies survive or break down? In this paper, it returns to this classic question with an empirical focus on Latin America from 1945 to 2005. The argument deviates from the quantitative literature and a good part of the qualitative literature on democratic survival and breakdown. It is argued that structural variables such as the level of development and inequalities have not shaped prospects for democratic survival in Latin America. Nor, contrary to findings in some of the literature, has economic performance affected the survival of competitive regimes. Instead, it is focused on the regional political environment and on actors’ normative preferences about democracy and dictatorship and their policy radicalism or moderation. It is argued that 1) a higher level of development did not increase the likelihood of democratic survival in Latin America over this long time; 2) if actors have a normative preference for democracy, it is more likely to survive; and 3) policy moderation facilitates democratic survival. |
topic |
democracia dictadura actores políticos preferencias normativas radicalismo |
url |
https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/12326 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anibalperezlinan democraticsurvivalinlatinamerica19452005 AT scottmainwaring democraticsurvivalinlatinamerica19452005 |
_version_ |
1724524572793896960 |