Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves

Mark Z. Danielewski extends his critique of reliability – to the “destabilization” of “center” and “origin” and “totality” that Derrida famously exposes in “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” in 1966 – to all of House of Leaves’ paratexts, even to the narratives readers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jason S. Polley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The International Academic Forum 2018-08-01
Series:IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-5-issue-1/article-1/
id doaj-118872e3ee5e4757a49bebc2af5e72ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-118872e3ee5e4757a49bebc2af5e72ed2020-11-24T20:52:20ZengThe International Academic ForumIAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film2187-06672187-06672018-08-0151522doi.org/10.22492/ijmcf.5.1.01Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of LeavesJason S. Polley0Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong KongMark Z. Danielewski extends his critique of reliability – to the “destabilization” of “center” and “origin” and “totality” that Derrida famously exposes in “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” in 1966 – to all of House of Leaves’ paratexts, even to the narratives readers traditionally approach non-ironically or -critically, like the copyright page, the index, the cover blurbs, and the footnotes. Danielewski’s much-studied encyclopedic 2000 novel features a mise-en-abyme of competing “narrators,” thus compelling readers to encounter every text in and about the main text with critical suspicion. This unconventional, formal remove, however, is apparent to any reader who simply thumbs through Danielewski’s text. Paradoxically, beneath this deconstructionist instability, the novel is anchored in a form of stability, namely connection. Protagonist Will Navidson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning photo-journalist and documentary filmmaker modelled on actual Pulitzer Prize-winner (and 1994 suicide) Kevin Carter. At stake here is how Danielewski blurs classical boundaries between fact and fiction, between reality and its reportage, in order to reclaim a modernist centre based on “readerly” identification. Danielewski’s encyclopedia of the famous Carter photograph comes to un-complicate the complicated subject positions post-structuralism first exposed. Speaking to this un-complication of complication by way of the irrealism and intimization that recent documentary theory propounds, the article considers House of Leaves as a case study about belief. Realism, which documentary theory shows is all about artifice, has no affective bearing on belief. Belief, Danielewski illustrates, can transcend binaries like official-unofficial and fiction-nonfiction.https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-5-issue-1/article-1/House of Leavesdocumentarydeconstructionparatextsremediationirrealismreaderly identification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jason S. Polley
spellingShingle Jason S. Polley
Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
House of Leaves
documentary
deconstruction
paratexts
remediation
irrealism
readerly identification
author_facet Jason S. Polley
author_sort Jason S. Polley
title Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
title_short Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
title_full Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
title_fullStr Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
title_full_unstemmed Documenting the (Un)official Kevin Carter Narrative: Encyclopedism, Irrealism, and Intimization in House of Leaves
title_sort documenting the (un)official kevin carter narrative: encyclopedism, irrealism, and intimization in house of leaves
publisher The International Academic Forum
series IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film
issn 2187-0667
2187-0667
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Mark Z. Danielewski extends his critique of reliability – to the “destabilization” of “center” and “origin” and “totality” that Derrida famously exposes in “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences” in 1966 – to all of House of Leaves’ paratexts, even to the narratives readers traditionally approach non-ironically or -critically, like the copyright page, the index, the cover blurbs, and the footnotes. Danielewski’s much-studied encyclopedic 2000 novel features a mise-en-abyme of competing “narrators,” thus compelling readers to encounter every text in and about the main text with critical suspicion. This unconventional, formal remove, however, is apparent to any reader who simply thumbs through Danielewski’s text. Paradoxically, beneath this deconstructionist instability, the novel is anchored in a form of stability, namely connection. Protagonist Will Navidson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning photo-journalist and documentary filmmaker modelled on actual Pulitzer Prize-winner (and 1994 suicide) Kevin Carter. At stake here is how Danielewski blurs classical boundaries between fact and fiction, between reality and its reportage, in order to reclaim a modernist centre based on “readerly” identification. Danielewski’s encyclopedia of the famous Carter photograph comes to un-complicate the complicated subject positions post-structuralism first exposed. Speaking to this un-complication of complication by way of the irrealism and intimization that recent documentary theory propounds, the article considers House of Leaves as a case study about belief. Realism, which documentary theory shows is all about artifice, has no affective bearing on belief. Belief, Danielewski illustrates, can transcend binaries like official-unofficial and fiction-nonfiction.
topic House of Leaves
documentary
deconstruction
paratexts
remediation
irrealism
readerly identification
url https://iafor.org/journal/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/volume-5-issue-1/article-1/
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonspolley documentingtheunofficialkevincarternarrativeencyclopedismirrealismandintimizationinhouseofleaves
_version_ 1716799912870412288