Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia

The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using baseline neuromonitoring (BNM) compared with multimodality monitoring (M3) for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Sixty-two patients with severe TBI underwent a prospective observational study where they were divided i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Ismail Ibrahim, Mazlan Abdullah, Lin Naing, Jafri Malin Abdullah, Zamzuri Idris, Syed Mohamed Aljunid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2007-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958408600366
id doaj-118e84cf236d4b05a53aabd3ed9650a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-118e84cf236d4b05a53aabd3ed9650a02020-11-24T22:37:30ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842007-10-0130426126610.1016/S1015-9584(08)60036-6Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like MalaysiaMohd Ismail Ibrahim0Mazlan Abdullah1Lin Naing2Jafri Malin Abdullah3Zamzuri Idris4Syed Mohamed Aljunid5Departments of Community Medicine School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains MalaysiaDepartments of Community Medicine School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains MalaysiaDepartments of Community Medicine School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains MalaysiaNeurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains MalaysiaNeurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains MalaysiaDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, National University, MalaysiaThe aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using baseline neuromonitoring (BNM) compared with multimodality monitoring (M3) for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Sixty-two patients with severe TBI underwent a prospective observational study where they were divided into two groups of patients receiving treatment with M3 (32 patients) and BNM (30 patients). The macro and micro costings were performed on each patient. The Barthel Index score after 1 year was used as an outcome measurement tool for both groups. The cost-effectiveness (CE) ratio was calculated using the Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The costs of equipment and consumables between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) after correcting for age and severity of injury. Other cost categories were not significantly different. The crude CE ratios were 168.66 (95% CI: 168.32, 169.03) and 144.16 (95% CI: 143.87, 144.45) for BNM and M3 respectively. The two crude CE ratios were significantly different (p < 0.001). It was calculated by controlling or adjusting age, gender, Glasgow Coma Score, Marshall's classification at admission and type of injury. The adjusted CE ratios were 171.32 (95% CI: 170.97, 171.68) and 141.50 (95% CI: 141.26, 141.79) for BNM and M3, respectively. The two adjusted CE ratios were significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The application of M3 for severe TBI was more cost-effective than BNM. All calculations were made at 3.8 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) to the United States dollar (USD).http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958408600366cost-effectivenesseconomic evaluationmultiple neuromonitoringsevere traumatic brain injury
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohd Ismail Ibrahim
Mazlan Abdullah
Lin Naing
Jafri Malin Abdullah
Zamzuri Idris
Syed Mohamed Aljunid
spellingShingle Mohd Ismail Ibrahim
Mazlan Abdullah
Lin Naing
Jafri Malin Abdullah
Zamzuri Idris
Syed Mohamed Aljunid
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
Asian Journal of Surgery
cost-effectiveness
economic evaluation
multiple neuromonitoring
severe traumatic brain injury
author_facet Mohd Ismail Ibrahim
Mazlan Abdullah
Lin Naing
Jafri Malin Abdullah
Zamzuri Idris
Syed Mohamed Aljunid
author_sort Mohd Ismail Ibrahim
title Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
title_short Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
title_full Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Using Multiple Neuromodalities in Treating Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Developing Country Like Malaysia
title_sort cost effectiveness analysis of using multiple neuromodalities in treating severe traumatic brain injury in a developing country like malaysia
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2007-10-01
description The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using baseline neuromonitoring (BNM) compared with multimodality monitoring (M3) for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Sixty-two patients with severe TBI underwent a prospective observational study where they were divided into two groups of patients receiving treatment with M3 (32 patients) and BNM (30 patients). The macro and micro costings were performed on each patient. The Barthel Index score after 1 year was used as an outcome measurement tool for both groups. The cost-effectiveness (CE) ratio was calculated using the Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The costs of equipment and consumables between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) after correcting for age and severity of injury. Other cost categories were not significantly different. The crude CE ratios were 168.66 (95% CI: 168.32, 169.03) and 144.16 (95% CI: 143.87, 144.45) for BNM and M3 respectively. The two crude CE ratios were significantly different (p < 0.001). It was calculated by controlling or adjusting age, gender, Glasgow Coma Score, Marshall's classification at admission and type of injury. The adjusted CE ratios were 171.32 (95% CI: 170.97, 171.68) and 141.50 (95% CI: 141.26, 141.79) for BNM and M3, respectively. The two adjusted CE ratios were significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The application of M3 for severe TBI was more cost-effective than BNM. All calculations were made at 3.8 Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) to the United States dollar (USD).
topic cost-effectiveness
economic evaluation
multiple neuromonitoring
severe traumatic brain injury
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958408600366
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdismailibrahim costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
AT mazlanabdullah costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
AT linnaing costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
AT jafrimalinabdullah costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
AT zamzuriidris costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
AT syedmohamedaljunid costeffectivenessanalysisofusingmultipleneuromodalitiesintreatingseveretraumaticbraininjuryinadevelopingcountrylikemalaysia
_version_ 1725716744617590784