Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach
Griggs et al. (2013) redefine sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present while safeguarding Earth's life-support system, on which the welfare of current and future generations depend." We recommend this as the end goal that the United Nations sustainab...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss3/art22/ |
id |
doaj-119d16c3f9ec4017ae244a101647a509 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-119d16c3f9ec4017ae244a101647a5092020-11-24T23:05:59ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872018-10-012332210.5751/ES-10182-23032210182Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approachMichelle M. L. Lim0Peter Søgaard Jørgensen1Carina A. Wyborn2Adelaide Law School, University of AdelaideGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesLuc Hoffmann Institute, IUCN Conservation Centre, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, SwitzerlandGriggs et al. (2013) redefine sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present while safeguarding Earth's life-support system, on which the welfare of current and future generations depend." We recommend this as the end goal that the United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) should strive to achieve. Integration across the SDGs is less than what is required from a science perspective. Effective implementation of the SDGs will require States to attend to trade-offs and overlaps. We argue that continuous failure to address integration within the SDGs will jeopardize realization of this ultimate end goal. Therefore, we adopt a systems approach to identify gaps and connections across the goals and targets of the SDGs as well as leverage points for effective intervention. We triangulate across methods of critical analysis, conceptual modeling, and keyword network analysis to draw out seven "overarching directions" that could provide a prioritization framework to enhance efficient implementation of the SDGs. Our results identify main gaps as exclusion of key actors (e.g., corporations) and issues (e.g., intergenerational equity and population); inadequate reconciliation of economic growth with maintaining the Earth system; and deficient consideration of the relationship with international law. Conceptual mapping identifies education and innovation; governance and implementation; sustainable consumption and production; and addressing the key drivers of climate change as key leverage points. The keyword analysis highlights greater integration within the SDGs than what appears at face value. Keywords "access," "women," "resources," and "finance" feature across the SDGs and provide further leverage points. Targeting these issues will facilitate realization of a high proportion of SDGs and correspondingly could have a disproportional impact on effective SDG implementation. We conclude that the success of the SDGs needs to be evaluated by the extent to which it contributes to human development while advancing protection of "planetary must-haves" for current and future generations.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss3/art22/implementationsustainable development goalssystems approach |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michelle M. L. Lim Peter Søgaard Jørgensen Carina A. Wyborn |
spellingShingle |
Michelle M. L. Lim Peter Søgaard Jørgensen Carina A. Wyborn Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach Ecology and Society implementation sustainable development goals systems approach |
author_facet |
Michelle M. L. Lim Peter Søgaard Jørgensen Carina A. Wyborn |
author_sort |
Michelle M. L. Lim |
title |
Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach |
title_short |
Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach |
title_full |
Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach |
title_fullStr |
Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene - a systems approach |
title_sort |
reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the anthropocene - a systems approach |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
Griggs et al. (2013) redefine sustainable development as "development that meets the needs of the present while safeguarding Earth's life-support system, on which the welfare of current and future generations depend." We recommend this as the end goal that the United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) should strive to achieve. Integration across the SDGs is less than what is required from a science perspective. Effective implementation of the SDGs will require States to attend to trade-offs and overlaps. We argue that continuous failure to address integration within the SDGs will jeopardize realization of this ultimate end goal. Therefore, we adopt a systems approach to identify gaps and connections across the goals and targets of the SDGs as well as leverage points for effective intervention. We triangulate across methods of critical analysis, conceptual modeling, and keyword network analysis to draw out seven "overarching directions" that could provide a prioritization framework to enhance efficient implementation of the SDGs. Our results identify main gaps as exclusion of key actors (e.g., corporations) and issues (e.g., intergenerational equity and population); inadequate reconciliation of economic growth with maintaining the Earth system; and deficient consideration of the relationship with international law. Conceptual mapping identifies education and innovation; governance and implementation; sustainable consumption and production; and addressing the key drivers of climate change as key leverage points. The keyword analysis highlights greater integration within the SDGs than what appears at face value. Keywords "access," "women," "resources," and "finance" feature across the SDGs and provide further leverage points. Targeting these issues will facilitate realization of a high proportion of SDGs and correspondingly could have a disproportional impact on effective SDG implementation. We conclude that the success of the SDGs needs to be evaluated by the extent to which it contributes to human development while advancing protection of "planetary must-haves" for current and future generations. |
topic |
implementation sustainable development goals systems approach |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss3/art22/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michellemllim reframingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstoachievesustainabledevelopmentintheanthropoceneasystemsapproach AT petersøgaardjørgensen reframingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstoachievesustainabledevelopmentintheanthropoceneasystemsapproach AT carinaawyborn reframingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalstoachievesustainabledevelopmentintheanthropoceneasystemsapproach |
_version_ |
1716369431259512832 |