Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions

The purpose was to understand how the ambidexterity degree (exploration + exploitation actions) can explain the variance of the number of students. As theoretical foundation, it was considered the arguments proposed by March (1991) and Tuschman and O’Reilly III (2004) about organizational ambidexter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliano Lima Soares, Dálcio Roberto dos Reis, João Carlos da Cunha, Pedro José Steiner Neto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Alberto Hurtado 2018-10-01
Series:Journal of Technology Management & Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/2724
id doaj-11a8d6f0db3940e0b6a555a71fb20fbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11a8d6f0db3940e0b6a555a71fb20fbb2021-02-16T21:51:10ZengUniversidad Alberto HurtadoJournal of Technology Management & Innovation0718-27242018-10-0113310.4067/S0718-272420180003000361124Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education InstitutionsJuliano Lima Soares0Dálcio Roberto dos Reis1João Carlos da Cunha2Pedro José Steiner Neto3Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiás, BrazilUniversidade Positivo, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniversidade Positivo, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilUniversidade Positivo, Curitiba, Parana, BrazilThe purpose was to understand how the ambidexterity degree (exploration + exploitation actions) can explain the variance of the number of students. As theoretical foundation, it was considered the arguments proposed by March (1991) and Tuschman and O’Reilly III (2004) about organizational ambidexterity (balance of incremental and radical innovation initiatives). About the methodology, a quantitative approach was used, and the sample counted with 79 executives of higher education institutions (HEI). For data analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square, cluster analysis, correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used. As outcome, the confirmation that ambidexterity can explain variance of the number of students in 20.6%. However, it was also observed that it cannot explain variation of the main index of teaching quality: General Course Index. Finally, there is a proposition of a maturity degree for ambidexterity, subdivided into four levels: I - Embryonic, II - Structured, III - Semi-developed and IV - Developed.https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/2724Innovation managementOrganizational ambidexterityHigher education institutions.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliano Lima Soares
Dálcio Roberto dos Reis
João Carlos da Cunha
Pedro José Steiner Neto
spellingShingle Juliano Lima Soares
Dálcio Roberto dos Reis
João Carlos da Cunha
Pedro José Steiner Neto
Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
Journal of Technology Management & Innovation
Innovation management
Organizational ambidexterity
Higher education institutions.
author_facet Juliano Lima Soares
Dálcio Roberto dos Reis
João Carlos da Cunha
Pedro José Steiner Neto
author_sort Juliano Lima Soares
title Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
title_short Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
title_full Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
title_fullStr Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
title_full_unstemmed Organizational Ambidexterity: A study in Brazilian Higher Education Institutions
title_sort organizational ambidexterity: a study in brazilian higher education institutions
publisher Universidad Alberto Hurtado
series Journal of Technology Management & Innovation
issn 0718-2724
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The purpose was to understand how the ambidexterity degree (exploration + exploitation actions) can explain the variance of the number of students. As theoretical foundation, it was considered the arguments proposed by March (1991) and Tuschman and O’Reilly III (2004) about organizational ambidexterity (balance of incremental and radical innovation initiatives). About the methodology, a quantitative approach was used, and the sample counted with 79 executives of higher education institutions (HEI). For data analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square, cluster analysis, correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used. As outcome, the confirmation that ambidexterity can explain variance of the number of students in 20.6%. However, it was also observed that it cannot explain variation of the main index of teaching quality: General Course Index. Finally, there is a proposition of a maturity degree for ambidexterity, subdivided into four levels: I - Embryonic, II - Structured, III - Semi-developed and IV - Developed.
topic Innovation management
Organizational ambidexterity
Higher education institutions.
url https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/2724
work_keys_str_mv AT julianolimasoares organizationalambidexterityastudyinbrazilianhighereducationinstitutions
AT dalciorobertodosreis organizationalambidexterityastudyinbrazilianhighereducationinstitutions
AT joaocarlosdacunha organizationalambidexterityastudyinbrazilianhighereducationinstitutions
AT pedrojosesteinerneto organizationalambidexterityastudyinbrazilianhighereducationinstitutions
_version_ 1724265976916082688