Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors

Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for computed tomograpy (CT)‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation (MWA) of small subpleural lung tumors. Methods Fifty‐six patients with small subpleural lung tumors (< 3.0 cm) entere...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haipeng Jia, Jie Tian, Bo Liu, Hong Meng, Fengmin Pan, Chunhai Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-08-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13137
id doaj-120631a9a09a43be84558baad46d1a30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-120631a9a09a43be84558baad46d1a302020-11-24T21:54:08ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142019-08-011081710171610.1111/1759-7714.13137Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumorsHaipeng Jia0Jie Tian1Bo Liu2Hong Meng3Fengmin Pan4Chunhai Li5Department of Radiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan ChinaDepartment of Respiration Huantai County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Zibo ChinaDepartment of Radiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan ChinaDepartment of Radiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan ChinaDepartment of Radiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan ChinaDepartment of Radiology Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Jinan ChinaBackground To evaluate the efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for computed tomograpy (CT)‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation (MWA) of small subpleural lung tumors. Methods Fifty‐six patients with small subpleural lung tumors (< 3.0 cm) entered the study and underwent CT‐guided MWA with (group I: 24 patients with 24 tumors) or without (group II: 32 patients with 34 tumors) the support of artificial pneumothorax. Follow‐up contrast‐enhanced CT scans were reviewed. Pain VAS (visual analog scale) scores at, during, and after ablation were compared between the two groups. Technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor control and complications were compared. Results Creation of the artificial pneumothorax was achieved for 24/24 (100%) in group I and no complication related to the procedure was observed. Technical success of MWA was achieved for all 58 tumors. Primary efficacy of MWA was achieved in 23 of 24 tumors (95.8%) treated in group I, and 32 of 34 tumors (94.1%) treated in group II (P = 0.771). The 12‐month local tumor control was achieved in 87.5% (21/24) in group I compared with 88.2% (30/34) in group II (P = 0.833). Pain VAS scores in group I were significantly decreased after the pneumothorax induction at, during, and after ablation compared with group II (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MWA‐related complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion Artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided MWA is effective and may be safely applied to small subpleural lung tumors. Artificial pneumothorax is a reliable therapy for pain relief.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13137Artificial pneumothoraxlung tumorsmicrowave ablationpain relief
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haipeng Jia
Jie Tian
Bo Liu
Hong Meng
Fengmin Pan
Chunhai Li
spellingShingle Haipeng Jia
Jie Tian
Bo Liu
Hong Meng
Fengmin Pan
Chunhai Li
Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
Thoracic Cancer
Artificial pneumothorax
lung tumors
microwave ablation
pain relief
author_facet Haipeng Jia
Jie Tian
Bo Liu
Hong Meng
Fengmin Pan
Chunhai Li
author_sort Haipeng Jia
title Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
title_short Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
title_full Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
title_sort efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for ct‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation of small subpleural lung tumors
publisher Wiley
series Thoracic Cancer
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for computed tomograpy (CT)‐guided percutaneous transthoracic microwave ablation (MWA) of small subpleural lung tumors. Methods Fifty‐six patients with small subpleural lung tumors (< 3.0 cm) entered the study and underwent CT‐guided MWA with (group I: 24 patients with 24 tumors) or without (group II: 32 patients with 34 tumors) the support of artificial pneumothorax. Follow‐up contrast‐enhanced CT scans were reviewed. Pain VAS (visual analog scale) scores at, during, and after ablation were compared between the two groups. Technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor control and complications were compared. Results Creation of the artificial pneumothorax was achieved for 24/24 (100%) in group I and no complication related to the procedure was observed. Technical success of MWA was achieved for all 58 tumors. Primary efficacy of MWA was achieved in 23 of 24 tumors (95.8%) treated in group I, and 32 of 34 tumors (94.1%) treated in group II (P = 0.771). The 12‐month local tumor control was achieved in 87.5% (21/24) in group I compared with 88.2% (30/34) in group II (P = 0.833). Pain VAS scores in group I were significantly decreased after the pneumothorax induction at, during, and after ablation compared with group II (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in MWA‐related complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion Artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for CT‐guided MWA is effective and may be safely applied to small subpleural lung tumors. Artificial pneumothorax is a reliable therapy for pain relief.
topic Artificial pneumothorax
lung tumors
microwave ablation
pain relief
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13137
work_keys_str_mv AT haipengjia efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
AT jietian efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
AT boliu efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
AT hongmeng efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
AT fengminpan efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
AT chunhaili efficacyandsafetyofartificialpneumothoraxwithpositionadjustmentforctguidedpercutaneoustransthoracicmicrowaveablationofsmallsubpleurallungtumors
_version_ 1725868730849689600