Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies.
Recent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008-2012.A community-...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257562?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-1209f6aaeedc45909fcddcd156e8f0c6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1209f6aaeedc45909fcddcd156e8f0c62020-11-25T01:42:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11433210.1371/journal.pone.0114332Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies.Martin C S WongJessica Y L ChingVictor C W ChanJeffrey P ShumThomas Y T LamArthur K C LukJoseph J Y SungRecent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008-2012.A community-based screening practice recruited 5,813 asymptomatic residents aged 50 to 70 years in Hong Kong for CRC screening. We included study participants who had (1). positive FIT with subsequent colonoscopy workup (FIT+ group; n = 356); (2). negative FIT in three consecutive years and received a colonoscopy (FIT- group; n = 857); (3). received colonoscopy without FIT (colonoscopy group; n = 473); and (4). received both colonoscopy and FIT at the same time (combined group; n = 4,127). One binary logistic regression model evaluated whether prior FIT results were associated with colonoscopy findings of AN.The proportion of participants having AN/CRC was 18.0% (FIT+), 5.5% (FIT-), 8.0% (colonoscopy group), and 4.3% (combined group), respectively. When compared with the colonoscopy group, those in the FIT- group were not significantly more or less likely to have AN/CRC (AOR = 0.77, 95% C.I. = 0.51 to 1.18, p = 0.230). Having one (AOR = 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.48-1.12, p = 0.151) or three consecutive negative FIT result (AOR = 0.98, 95% C.I. 0.60-1.62, p = 0.944) were not associated with lower risks of AN/CRC. Subjects in the FIT+ group was 3.32-fold (95% C.I. 2.07 to 5.32, p < 0.001) more likely to have AN/CRC.These findings indicated that subjects with negative FIT findings could be risk stratified similarly as those who had not previously received FIT.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257562?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martin C S Wong Jessica Y L Ching Victor C W Chan Jeffrey P Shum Thomas Y T Lam Arthur K C Luk Joseph J Y Sung |
spellingShingle |
Martin C S Wong Jessica Y L Ching Victor C W Chan Jeffrey P Shum Thomas Y T Lam Arthur K C Luk Joseph J Y Sung Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Martin C S Wong Jessica Y L Ching Victor C W Chan Jeffrey P Shum Thomas Y T Lam Arthur K C Luk Joseph J Y Sung |
author_sort |
Martin C S Wong |
title |
Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
title_short |
Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
title_full |
Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
title_fullStr |
Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should prior FIT results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? A prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
title_sort |
should prior fit results be incorporated as an additional variable to estimate risk of colorectal neoplasia? a prospective study of 5,813 screening colonoscopies. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Recent studies showed that previous negative results from faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was associated with lower risk of advanced neoplasia (AN). We evaluated whether prior FIT results should be included to estimate the risk of AN in 2008-2012.A community-based screening practice recruited 5,813 asymptomatic residents aged 50 to 70 years in Hong Kong for CRC screening. We included study participants who had (1). positive FIT with subsequent colonoscopy workup (FIT+ group; n = 356); (2). negative FIT in three consecutive years and received a colonoscopy (FIT- group; n = 857); (3). received colonoscopy without FIT (colonoscopy group; n = 473); and (4). received both colonoscopy and FIT at the same time (combined group; n = 4,127). One binary logistic regression model evaluated whether prior FIT results were associated with colonoscopy findings of AN.The proportion of participants having AN/CRC was 18.0% (FIT+), 5.5% (FIT-), 8.0% (colonoscopy group), and 4.3% (combined group), respectively. When compared with the colonoscopy group, those in the FIT- group were not significantly more or less likely to have AN/CRC (AOR = 0.77, 95% C.I. = 0.51 to 1.18, p = 0.230). Having one (AOR = 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.48-1.12, p = 0.151) or three consecutive negative FIT result (AOR = 0.98, 95% C.I. 0.60-1.62, p = 0.944) were not associated with lower risks of AN/CRC. Subjects in the FIT+ group was 3.32-fold (95% C.I. 2.07 to 5.32, p < 0.001) more likely to have AN/CRC.These findings indicated that subjects with negative FIT findings could be risk stratified similarly as those who had not previously received FIT. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4257562?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martincswong shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT jessicaylching shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT victorcwchan shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT jeffreypshum shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT thomasytlam shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT arthurkcluk shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies AT josephjysung shouldpriorfitresultsbeincorporatedasanadditionalvariabletoestimateriskofcolorectalneoplasiaaprospectivestudyof5813screeningcolonoscopies |
_version_ |
1725035371334467584 |